![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read that the much denser LOX is on the top[*] of the ET, with the
LH below it. This seems counter-intuitive. I would think from a structural point of view, you would want the heavier stuff on the bottom, and it would also move the vehicle's CG aft, which I would think would improve aerodynamic stability. I assume NASA didn't just flip a coin to decide which goes on top, so there must be more to it that that. What's the real answer? [*] I'm not sure what the coordinate system is here. Is the pointy end the top or the front? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA's Mike Butler Maintains Bird's Eye View of Shuttle External Tank | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 6th 05 10:14 AM |
NASA's Mike Butler Maintains Bird's Eye View of Shuttle External Tank | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | April 6th 05 10:14 AM |
NASA Finishes Redesigned Shuttle Fuel Tank | Jim deGriz | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 28th 04 11:33 PM |
Media invited to see Shuttle External Fuel Tank ship from Mishoud | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 1 | December 28th 04 10:41 PM |
Pressure Tank Mass (was Basci question about rocket shapes. | Vincent Cate | Technology | 0 | July 24th 03 06:47 AM |