![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am going to an observing area where other amateur astronomers may be
i the vicinity. I use a laptop to control my CCD camera and telescope and was concerned about minimizing the light from laptop screen so I don't annoy other astronomers. I'm sure that other people have run into this situation at star parties and such and was wondering what is the best solution - keep the screen useful (viewable) - accessibility to the keyboard and mouse - prevent light leakage from disturbing other observers. I have heard of mounting red plexiglass over the monitor. Where is the best place to find this. I usually do use night vision red color schema on the computers, bu sometimes if a reboot is required it comes back with the standard color schema and therefore would like to avoid relying solely on this. Thanks in advance for any helpful suggestions. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:16:40 -0500, Philip Washington
wrote: I am going to an observing area where other amateur astronomers may be i the vicinity. I use a laptop to control my CCD camera and telescope and was concerned about minimizing the light from laptop screen so I don't annoy other astronomers. I'm sure that other people have run into this situation at star parties and such and was wondering what is the best solution - keep the screen useful (viewable) - accessibility to the keyboard and mouse - prevent light leakage from disturbing other observers. I have heard of mounting red plexiglass over the monitor. Where is the best place to find this. I usually do use night vision red color schema on the computers, bu sometimes if a reboot is required it comes back with the standard color schema and therefore would like to avoid relying solely on this. Thanks in advance for any helpful suggestions. I start by using a simple attenuating filter. I always use several layers of neutral gray (limousine) window tinting over the display. Some people use red, but I advise against that. Most red plastics (like Rubylith) aren't deep enough red to protect night vision, and forcing a color display to red can make readability difficult. Better IMO to use a neutral filter combined with a color scheme suitable for your own eyes (which may not be red at all). Of course, you may not be observing at all, so protecting your own night vision may not be very important. Next, I cover the laptop with a box with the front open. This blocks all the side light (which is a problem with LCDs) and also does a good job of protecting the computer from dew. An option to covering the computer with a box is to use a privacy filter (often advertised in airline magazines, since they are very useful when flying). These effectively block light more than about 20° from perpendicular. You would still need an attenuation filter, though. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris L. Peterson wrote:
I start by using a simple attenuating filter. I always use several layers of neutral gray (limousine) window tinting over the display. Some people use red, but I advise against that. Most red plastics (like Rubylith) aren't deep enough red to protect night vision, and forcing a color display to red can make readability difficult. It depends on the software. With Megastar in the "night vision" mode, even a single layer of Rubylith works just fine with my laptop when it is set to minimum brightness, although I might suggest the use of two layers for some displays. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 12th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 31 - Aug. 5, 2005, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:34:35 -0500, David Knisely
wrote: It depends on the software. With Megastar in the "night vision" mode, even a single layer of Rubylith works just fine with my laptop when it is set to minimum brightness, although I might suggest the use of two layers for some displays. Clear skies to you. I don't like red for several reasons- first, in my case, red is not the best color for preserving my night vision; I do far better with white (and Rubylith isn't red enough to protect anyone's night vision, anyway). Second, automatic night vision modes usually leave some elements of Windows unreadable through red plastic. So things may look fine when in Megastar, but when you switch to a different application buttons aren't readable (I think it makes more sense to develop a night vision scheme than to depend on the night vision mode of any one application). The OP is an imager, so he is going to be moving between different apps. If you are critically evaluating your images as you make them, doing it through any kind of colored filter is a bad idea. Of course, if you are shooting color (single shot, or doing a little processing in the field) it is impossible to use a color filter. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Philip Washington wrote:
I am going to an observing area where other amateur astronomers may be i the vicinity. I use a laptop to control my CCD camera and telescope and was concerned about minimizing the light from laptop screen so I don't annoy other astronomers. I'm sure that other people have run into this situation at star parties and such and was wondering what is the best solution - keep the screen useful (viewable) - accessibility to the keyboard and mouse - prevent light leakage from disturbing other observers. I have heard of mounting red plexiglass over the monitor. Where is the best place to find this. Several companies sell various red sheets - I gather that the "plexiglas" versions are less effective than others; some experimentaiton may be required. I like Chris' box suggestion downthread - I'm going to try that for the added dew protection; but also because I like to get all set up in daylight and it's hard to read the screen in daylight. The box should help. Re the keyboard, red lights on stocks are also available specifically for illuminating keyboards. A web search is in order. I usually do use night vision red color schema on the computers, bu sometimes if a reboot is required it comes back with the standard color schema and therefore would like to avoid relying solely on this. Ah! That problem is easily solved. Run Linux or BSD Unix (AKA Mac OSX ![]() No more re-boots. grin Thanks in advance for any helpful suggestions. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Philip Washington wrote: I am going to an observing area where other amateur astronomers may be i the vicinity. I use a laptop to control my CCD camera and telescope and was concerned about minimizing the light from laptop screen so I don't annoy other astronomers. Hi: There's always the option of Rublith and similar gel filters. I found I wanted something a little more sturdy, however. I've been very pleased with the "Sightsaver" from idealastronomy.com. It works and looks like it'll last a long time. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of:_Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chris L Peterson" wrote in message
... On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:34:35 -0500, David Knisely wrote: It depends on the software. With Megastar in the "night vision" mode, even a single layer of Rubylith works just fine with my laptop when it is set to minimum brightness, although I might suggest the use of two layers for some displays. Clear skies to you. I don't like red for several reasons- first, in my case, red is not the best color for preserving my night vision; I do far better with white (and Rubylith isn't red enough to protect anyone's night vision, anyway). Second, automatic night vision modes usually leave some elements of Windows unreadable through red plastic. So things may look fine when in Megastar, but when you switch to a different application buttons aren't readable (I think it makes more sense to develop a night vision scheme than to depend on the night vision mode of any one application). The OP is an imager, so he is going to be moving between different apps. If you are critically evaluating your images as you make them, doing it through any kind of colored filter is a bad idea. Of course, if you are shooting color (single shot, or doing a little processing in the field) it is impossible to use a color filter. If you're willing to twiddle with the entire color scheme, you can set up a Windows screen to work with Rubellite fine. I've not have any problems. But not everyone wants to go through the effort, and not every laptop is dimmed enough using just one sheet of Rubellite. --- Dave -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pinprick holes in a colorless sky Let inspired figures of light pass by The Mighty Light of ten thousand suns Challenges infinity, and is soon gone |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris L. Peterson wrote:
(and Rubylith isn't red enough to protect anyone's night vision, anyway). Do you have sources to support this statement? -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 12th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 31 - Aug. 5, 2005, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:30:41 -0500, David Knisely
wrote: Do you have sources to support this statement? Well, I have a transmission curve for 5DR Rubylith. It is designed for standard photo typesetting paper, and has a cutoff that goes from about 625nm to 640nm. The rhodopsin in your rods is responsive to about 655nm. So the light coming through is doing a perfectly good job of bleaching your rods. A good night vision safe light will be longer than 650nm, but getting plastic with this cutoff isn't easy (and IMO, not necessary for many people). _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Steinberg wrote:
(snip) Nevertheless, I offer some alternative options that I do not see posted here. Softwa DarkAdapted, for Mac and Windows: http://www.adpartnership.net/DarkAda...ructions_Label Offering a range of gamma presets for red and green screens as well as the ability to customize the curves to a setting that best suits your needs. Presumably Linux users can manage this at the terminal thus I'll stop here. John..... That DarkAdaped looks interesting.....have you used it? Wayne Howell Photon Phlats Observatory Port Townsend, WA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
.965 illuminated reticle | Tom Wales | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | January 4th 05 08:39 PM |
All technology outdated | betalimit | Policy | 0 | September 20th 04 03:41 PM |
All technology outdated | betalimit | Policy | 0 | September 20th 04 03:41 PM |
Milky Way's Big Bang | Giovanni | Astronomy Misc | 30 | January 6th 04 10:32 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |