![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
POWER BLACKOUT REINFORCES POINT: DON'T PRIVATIZE SYSTEMS SPECIALISTS
WASHINGTON - When the massive electrical power outage hit eight states in two of the country's busiest air traffic regions last Thursday, the system put into place to land those flights safely worked flawlessly thanks to the hard work and dedication of the FAA systems specialist workforce, the union representing systems specialists said today. "Tens of thousands of air travelers' lives were at stake," said Michael D. Fanfalone, president of the Professional Airways Systems Specialists (PASS), "and just like on September 11, 2001, our technicians provided a vital service that ensured their safe arrival." On Friday, he noted, the Federal Aviation Administration "acknowledged that our systems specialists 'once again performed like champions' in coping with a chaotic situation, but next year, unless the Congress decides otherwise, the FAA will be auctioning their critical functions off to the lowest bidder." FAA systems specialists certify and maintain the essential equipment used by air traffic controllers to guide over 200,000 commercial flights safely everyday. During the blackout, systems specialists ensured that the air traffic control system was functioning at all times by coordinating backup generators, prioritizing equipment and facilities, monitoring outages and notifying air traffic control of what systems were available to use, as well as keeping an eye on the potential impact on the entire air traffic control system. "There is no single company in existence today with the systems specialist workforce's capability to keep our air traffic control system safe," Fanfalone said. "Systems specialists understand the intricacies of the entire air traffic control system. If it is privatized, the FAA would have to break up the work among many bidders in many states, assuring that a crisis like last week's power failure would endanger the public's safety." Fanfalone further explained that when problems occur with air traffic contro l equipment, contractors have to be called to the site, extending the length of any equipment outage. "Instead, systems specialists were already onsite last week and they kept the air traffic control system functioning smoothly and, most importantly, safely." At issue is a congressional conference committee report on the FAA reauthorization bill, filed just prior to Congress' August recess. PASS officials note that the report disregards language in the Senate version of the bill that included bipartisan efforts to protect the systems specialist workforce. Instead, the conference committee yielded to White House pressure and opened the door to privatizing the important functions performed by systems specialists. # # # PASS represents more than 11,000 employees of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department who install, maintain, support and certify air traffic control and national defense equipment, inspect and oversee the commercial and general aviation industries, develop flight procedures and perform quality analyses of the aviation systems. For more information, visit the PASS Web site at http://www.passnational.org. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"PlanetJ" wrote in message
.. . POWER BLACKOUT REINFORCES POINT: DON'T PRIVATIZE SYSTEMS SPECIALISTS WASHINGTON - When the massive electrical power outage hit eight states in two of the country's busiest air traffic regions last Thursday, the system put into place to land those flights safely worked flawlessly thanks to the hard work and dedication of the FAA systems specialist workforce, the union representing systems specialists said today. "Tens of thousands of air travelers' lives were at stake," said Michael D. Fanfalone, president of the Professional Airways Systems Specialists (PASS), "and just like on September 11, 2001, our technicians provided a vital service that ensured their safe arrival." On Friday, he noted, the Federal Aviation Administration "acknowledged that our systems specialists 'once again performed like champions' in coping with a chaotic situation, but next year, unless the Congress decides otherwise, the FAA will be auctioning their critical functions off to the lowest bidder." FAA systems specialists certify and maintain the essential equipment used by air traffic controllers to guide over 200,000 commercial flights safely everyday. During the blackout, systems specialists ensured that the air traffic control system was functioning at all times by coordinating backup generators, prioritizing equipment and facilities, monitoring outages and notifying air traffic control of what systems were available to use, as well as keeping an eye on the potential impact on the entire air traffic control system. "There is no single company in existence today with the systems specialist workforce's capability to keep our air traffic control system safe," Fanfalone said. "Systems specialists understand the intricacies of the entire air traffic control system. If it is privatized, the FAA would have to break up the work among many bidders in many states, assuring that a crisis like last week's power failure would endanger the public's safety." snip You must be kidding.. That's adding insult to injury. It's fairly obvious from the news reports that America's power system needs a little work, but to suggest that backup generators and UPS systems either need lots of watching or are not installed at all is a major slap on the wrist. And to insist that "There is no single company in existence today with the systems specialist workforce's capability to keep our air traffic control system safe.".. Maybe not in the USA!! I can guarantee that the US scenario could never happen in Australia (by accident anyway) and even if it did, Air Traffic Control in this country has never relied on the power grid to maintain aircraft safety. Silly Americans.. ;-) Cameron:-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PlanetJ wrote:
POWER BLACKOUT REINFORCES POINT: DON'T PRIVATIZE SYSTEMS SPECIALISTS SNIP UNION SPAM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ATC doesn't fly airplanes, pilots do.
-- Gene Seibel Hangar 131 - http://pad39a.com/gene/plane.html "Tens of thousands of air travelers' lives were at stake," said Michael D. Fanfalone, president of the Professional Airways Systems Specialists (PASS), "and just like on September 11, 2001, our technicians provided a vital service that ensured their safe arrival." On Friday, he noted, the Federal Aviation Administration "acknowledged that our systems specialists 'once again performed like champions' in coping with a chaotic situation, but next year, unless the Congress decides otherwise, the FAA will be auctioning their critical functions off to the lowest bidder." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But ATC's job is to keep track of all those aircraft and to alert
authorities in the event of any on-board emergency. The air traffic situation around most major airports, with typically one fully-loaded airliner landing or taking off every 30-40 seconds, can get a bit crazy - so if ATC is not functioning for whatever reason, an accident is very likely. Pilots can't see jet wash.. Cameron:-) "Gene Seibel" wrote in message om... ATC doesn't fly airplanes, pilots do. -- Gene Seibel Hangar 131 - http://pad39a.com/gene/plane.html "Tens of thousands of air travelers' lives were at stake," said Michael D. Fanfalone, president of the Professional Airways Systems Specialists (PASS), "and just like on September 11, 2001, our technicians provided a vital service that ensured their safe arrival." On Friday, he noted, the Federal Aviation Administration "acknowledged that our systems specialists 'once again performed like champions' in coping with a chaotic situation, but next year, unless the Congress decides otherwise, the FAA will be auctioning their critical functions off to the lowest bidder." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True, there would be chaos without ATC. However, in-flight emergencies
(which are rare) can only be handled by a pilot. There is little anyone else can do besides watch and listen until he's on the ground. Of course being a pilot, I may have a biased view. ![]() I'd agree that non-functioning ATC would increase the chances of an accident, but I believe _very likely_ is an exaggeration. Seeing and avoiding other traffic is still a very important form of collision avoidance, and airliners are now equipped with TCAS which tracks other aircraft independent of ATC. Becoming dependent on ATC and getting complacent about looking out the window can be a big problem. An occasional hiccup in the ATC system can serve as a good reminder. I don't mean to discount the concerns that you and others have - ATC failures are things to be concerned about. Of course the 30-40 second departures can't be maintained under those conditions and a lot of planes will be grounded, but pilots don't see it as something to panic about. -- Gene Seibel Hangar 131 - http://pad39a.com/gene/plane.html Because I fly, I eny no one. But ATC's job is to keep track of all those aircraft and to alert authorities in the event of any on-board emergency. The air traffic situation around most major airports, with typically one fully-loaded airliner landing or taking off every 30-40 seconds, can get a bit crazy - so if ATC is not functioning for whatever reason, an accident is very likely. Pilots can't see jet wash.. Cameron:-) "Gene Seibel" wrote in message om... ATC doesn't fly airplanes, pilots do. -- Gene Seibel Hangar 131 - http://pad39a.com/gene/plane.html "Tens of thousands of air travelers' lives were at stake," said Michael D. Fanfalone, president of the Professional Airways Systems Specialists (PASS), "and just like on September 11, 2001, our technicians provided a vital service that ensured their safe arrival." On Friday, he noted, the Federal Aviation Administration "acknowledged that our systems specialists 'once again performed like champions' in coping with a chaotic situation, but next year, unless the Congress decides otherwise, the FAA will be auctioning their critical functions off to the lowest bidder." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ISS On-Orbit Status, 20-05-2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 21st 04 02:47 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |
Low Bidder Air Traffic Control | PlanetJ | Space Shuttle | 5 | August 22nd 03 06:19 PM |
Alternate US control module? | EHylant | Space Station | 2 | July 15th 03 03:01 AM |