Galaxies Not Symmetrical ????

How can that be? They are huge,and have stars being born like our spiral
galaxy,but not the spiral shape,and not round ether. Then we have galaxy
NGC 55 that looks like our Milky Way(its spiral) but of all things it
has its central bulge not in its center(its off center) These irregular
galaxies need a lot of explaining. I don't like large structures that
don't have "order to them" Something is making them come apart. It has
to be a great gravity force.` I want the answer to this. Bert

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

How can that be? They are huge,and have stars being born like our spiral
galaxy,but not the spiral shape,and not round ether. Then we have galaxy
NGC 55 that looks like our Milky Way(its spiral) but of all things it
has its central bulge not in its center(its off center) These irregular
galaxies need a lot of explaining. I don't like large structures that
don't have "order to them" Something is making them come apart. It has
to be a great gravity force.` I want the answer to this. Bert

nightbat

Gee Officer Bert, Officer Captain nightbat gave you that answer
long ago but your sci fi influencing glossy cover book friends
apparently keep muddying your mental apprehension. Demanding knowledge
is different then being able to fully grasp its understanding. Officer
oc referenced this recently about knowing or explaining a model and
fully understanding it are two different things. Officer oc has
explained his Wolter's model for net reported future generations. I have
explained my model for present as well as future folks so no wonder the
far advanced net Darla Star Race is mutually receptive. When you also
take into account Officer Greysky sending my old Deja and Google pre
2000 and present posts way into the future with his FTL buffers, no
wonder the future Earth and Star Race peoples are so friendly and
knowledgeable of my profound future time altering net presented
theories.

Here goes again, the basic 10^-50 base sub quantum field in limited
manifold disturbed Universe state is:

( UBE---N-UE---UBE )

Uniform Base Energy---Non-Uniform Energy---Uniform Base Energy

The center part represents the Universe in totality state of non uniform
momentum. Within this representative diagram center portion of the
Universe exist fractured spaced internal energy composed physical
condensed matter galaxies, and near uniform base energy dense
singularities or pockets nightbat presented ( Black Comet ) which can
centrally develop comparatively to the larger spaced apart disturbed non
uniform normal gravity dispersed body field ones. Explained nightbat
gravity effect is the dynamics of the eternal base energy field always
attempting uniform base energy renormalization. This gravity default
effect or common perceived force is not imaginary energy theoretical
gravitational transfer (Graviton) particles, or waves, or strings. Look
Officer Bert, if the future folks and net Darla Race got it, why can't
you? Try cutting down on your net reported affinity for boilermakers and
perhaps increasing reintake of your magical positive Red Mexican sweet
potato pies and lighter suds.

ponder on,
the nightbat

On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:13:23 -0400
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

How can that be? They are huge,and have stars being born like our
spiral galaxy,but not the spiral shape,and not round ether. Then we
have galaxy NGC 55 that looks like our Milky Way(its spiral) but of
all things it has its central bulge not in its center(its off center)
These irregular galaxies need a lot of explaining. I don't like large
structures that don't have "order to them" Something is making them
come apart. It has to be a great gravity force.` I want the answer to
this. Bert

This might help answer, if only you would use google Bert ;-)

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ...175/60175.html

Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:13:23 -0400
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

How can that be? They are huge,and have stars being born like our
spiral galaxy,but not the spiral shape,and not round ether. Then we
have galaxy NGC 55 that looks like our Milky Way(its spiral) but of
all things it has its central bulge not in its center(its off
center)
These irregular galaxies need a lot of explaining. I don't like
large
structures that don't have "order to them" Something is making
them
come apart. It has to be a great gravity force.` I want the answer
to
this. Bert

This might help answer, if only you would use google Bert ;-)


http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ...175/60175.html





Says I need a username and password???

Double-A

On 14 May 2005 02:10:54 -0700
"Double-A" wrote:


Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:13:23 -0400
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

How can that be? They are huge,and have stars being born like our
spiral galaxy,but not the spiral shape,and not round ether. Then
we have galaxy NGC 55 that looks like our Milky Way(its spiral)
but of all things it has its central bulge not in its center(its
off
center)
These irregular galaxies need a lot of explaining. I don't like
large
structures that don't have "order to them" Something is making
them
come apart. It has to be a great gravity force.` I want the answer
to
this. Bert

This might help answer, if only you would use google Bert ;-)


http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ...175/60175.html





Says I need a username and password???

Eh?, I just clicked on the link in my post and it took me straight
there no problem. I'm currently browsing around there looking for other
interesting stuff too again no problem.



Double-A

In message , Ray Vingnutte
writes
On 14 May 2005 02:10:54 -0700
"Double-A" wrote:


Ray Vingnutte wrote:

This might help answer, if only you would use google Bert ;-)



http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ...v154n1/60175/6
0175.html





Says I need a username and password???

Eh?, I just clicked on the link in my post and it took me straight
there no problem. I'm currently browsing around there looking for other
interesting stuff too again no problem.

That page is definitely subscription only. Ray, are you using an
institutional account?
And what's the title of the article? I can look at abstracts without a
subscription.
--
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.

On Sat, 14 May 2005 10:38:10 +0100
Jonathan Silverlight
wrote:

In message , Ray Vingnutte=20
writes
On 14 May 2005 02:10:54 -0700
"Double-A" wrote:


Ray Vingnutte wrote:

This might help answer, if only you would use google Bert ;-)


=20
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ...pJS/v154n1/601
75/60175.html





Says I need a username and password???

Eh?, I just clicked on the link in my post and it took me straight
there no problem. I'm currently browsing around there looking for
other interesting stuff too again no problem.
=20
That page is definitely subscription only. Ray, are you using an=20
institutional account?

No, just ordinary ISP account. I checked to see if I had Tor running and
I did so I turned it off and tried connecting again using my own real IP
and still got access.

Trouble is I now found an article there about bipolar emissions and
planetary nebula that would be interesting for the 'planetary nebula'
thread regarding MZ 3 and others.


And what's the title of the article? I can look at abstracts without a
subscription.


Hope this helps then, ok here goes....

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 154:248-252, 2004 September
=A9 2004. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed
in U.S.A.

=20

Far-Infrared Imaging of NGC 55=20

C. W. Engelbracht ,1 K. D. Gordon ,1 G. J. Bendo ,1 P. G. P=E9rez-Gonz=E1lez
,1 K. A. Misselt ,1 G. H. Rieke ,1 E. T. Young ,1 D. C. Hines ,1,2 D. M.
Kelly ,1 J. A. Stansberry ,1 C. Papovich ,1 J. E. Morrison ,1 E. Egami
,1 K. Y. L. Su ,1 J. Muzerolle ,1 H. Dole ,1 A. Alonso-Herrero ,1 J. L.
Hinz ,1 P. S. Smith ,1 W. B. Latter ,3 A. Noriega-Crespo ,3 D. L.
Padgett ,3 J. Rho ,3 D. T. Frayer ,3 and S. Wachter 3

Received 2004 March 25; accepted 2004 May 14




--=20
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.

Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On 14 May 2005 02:10:54 -0700
"Double-A" wrote:


Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:13:23 -0400
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

How can that be? They are huge,and have stars being born like
our
spiral galaxy,but not the spiral shape,and not round ether.
Then
we have galaxy NGC 55 that looks like our Milky Way(its spiral)
but of all things it has its central bulge not in its
center(its
off
center)
These irregular galaxies need a lot of explaining. I don't like
large
structures that don't have "order to them" Something is making
them
come apart. It has to be a great gravity force.` I want the
answer
to
this. Bert

This might help answer, if only you would use google Bert ;-)



http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ...175/60175.html





Says I need a username and password???

Eh?, I just clicked on the link in my post and it took me straight
there no problem. I'm currently browsing around there looking for
other
interesting stuff too again no problem.



Double-A



Ah come on, Ray, you were just telling us how sites treat us different
depending on our IP address.

I guess I should learn to use your "Tor" rerouting service.

Double-A

On 14 May 2005 03:05:40 -0700
"Double-A" wrote:


Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On 14 May 2005 02:10:54 -0700
"Double-A" wrote:


Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 19:13:23 -0400
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

How can that be? They are huge,and have stars being born like
our
spiral galaxy,but not the spiral shape,and not round ether.
Then
we have galaxy NGC 55 that looks like our Milky Way(its
spiral) but of all things it has its central bulge not in its
center(its
off
center)
These irregular galaxies need a lot of explaining. I don't
like
large
structures that don't have "order to them" Something is
making
them
come apart. It has to be a great gravity force.` I want the
answer
to
this. Bert

This might help answer, if only you would use google Bert ;-)



http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ...175/60175.html





Says I need a username and password???

Eh?, I just clicked on the link in my post and it took me straight
there no problem. I'm currently browsing around there looking for
other
interesting stuff too again no problem.



Double-A



Ah come on, Ray, you were just telling us how sites treat us different
depending on our IP address.

I guess I should learn to use your "Tor" rerouting service.

Tor is not mine it more yours really or started by your Navy people to
find a secure way of communicating. Also those nice peeps at
your NSA have done a SELinux (Security Enhanced Linux) that I'm playing
with on another machine. I wonder if MI5 or MI6 would ever be so open
and friendly ;-)




Double-A

Hi Ray Yes I could go to Google,and get all the best answers from that
computer program. But I have some pride that makes me think I can Think
Why should we bother discussing natures secrets here in this group if we
can just press a button and pipe into that great computer brain called
Google. We could all call each other Google. Google after all is our big
smart brother. Don't get me wrong Google has its place,but we must keep
a proper respective. The answer to why some galaxies are not
symmetrical is in Google. END OF STORY (oh Ya) Bert