The Gravity Energy Muddle

I see, here, that Jack espouses the Copenhagenshkeul formality
that results in many universes, fuzzee logeek & schroedinger's joke-cat
(which is extremely putrid at this point it time --
don't open that box).

thus quoth:
The Law of Free Lunch!

Seriously, flying saucers do not need a lot of on-board power
consumption. This is why Eric Davis's proposal to USAF for high-power
lasers for metric engineering is completely the wrong way to proceed to

the next step in "Black Ops" reverse engineering "The Visitor"
technology. Edgar Mitchell is correct that The Visitors from The
Universes Next Door are not way ahead of us. I mean some of them. It's
a
Big Multiverse Out There.

The discovery of Dark Energy was The Cosmic Trigger.

J: Einstein unfortunately misidentified tuv(Matter-Gravity) as the
energy of the gravity field. In fact this tuv = 0 when Tuv(Matter) = 0
everywhere-when.

Z: But Pauli's J_u are not objective quantities unless they are (1)
scalars

thus:
as I thought I explained,
quaternions is nothimg more than inner & outer products,
combined, since that's how WRH defined them;
Gibbs took them apart.

I think this is covered in Crowe's book on the history of vectors,
if that's his name.

in Lacczos, it's just "3+1 dimensional spacetime."

thus:
so, has anyone seen my result, before,
on autoheptality?... perhaps a better word for it exists, but
it's a direct analogy to autoduality.

Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium wrote:
my guess is that this is related
to the autoheptality of the hexahedron (or
"kyoob"). this is akin to the autoduality
of the tetrahedron. (I could have been

--ils ducs d'Enron!
http://tarpley.net/bush7.htm
http://larouchepub.com=20
http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac