![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light.
*************** Simplified ***************** The following are simple provable or logically deducible facts a) The speed of light (SOL) is measured constant in vacuum and also in any given medium. Its speed in vacuum is given the designator c. b) From a) we can also state that the velocity of the measuring equipment is zero with respect to(wrt) the light under measurement if the measurement is c. If that is the case the velocity of the vacuum will also be zero unless in a two way measurement there is a velocity discrepancy between the two paths. For future use the measuring equipment frame velocity will be assigned the variable fv and the vacuum velocity the variable vv. This is to allow for any offset which may need to be calculated in or out. c) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source as concluding otherwise would require the SOL to be dependant on the velocity of the source which experiments and logic have concluded it is not. Any Doppler shift due to relative motion at a or frequency shift at b fig 1 need to be considered if evaluating relative velocities. There are three dilectrics that the SOL has to be constant in to comply with a) if observing a star and calculating relative velocities. Dielectric of the source = (ds). Of the intevening space/vacuum = (dv) Of the observer = (do) a b Point(p) (ds)( dv )(do) fig1 If (ds),(dv) and (do) have no velocities with respect to each other (the norm.) then, if any disturbances caused by the gravity of (ds) and (do) are calculated out, (do) will observer source (ds) spectral signature(ss) essentially as it was transmitted. If on the other hand (ds) has a velocity relative to (dv)+(do) then this will be shown by the (ss) showing a deviation from the norm when observed by (do). In the case of (ds) and (dv) have no relative velocity and the velocity diferential being in (dv) (do) then (ss) will be changed by this velocity. In another case (ds) and (do) have no velocity wrt each other but have a velocity wrt (dv), this more difficult to measure particularly from (do) with only (ds) as a reference. So for this measurement we need to rotate (ds) and (do) round a some distant point (p) so their angular velocities have a significant difference but they are in line on a line drawn from the axis of rotation(p). The other requirement is that there are many other objects in (dv) to lock its velocity by dependency to these other objects and so give references for the vacuum velocity. Using the observed deviation by (do) from the source (ds) on the inner obit about the point, as a reference against the observed deviation from sources from the clock and anticlock directions, the velocity of (do) can be calculated wrt (dv). d) The conclusion from this is that the constacy of c is maintained by referencing itself to the vacuum velocity in which its being carried in. This indicates that the vacuum can have n number of velocities and that they can be deduced from the velocity of c. It needs to be clearly understood that the vacuum accommodates its velocity to the dominant velocity of dominant matter and/or dominant field in its local area. With the area being defined by the strength and type of effect. e) The observer can from observation of the deviation frequency (spectral shift) of light with a known frequency, determine their velocity with respect to the vacuum and other sources with respect to the vacuum by a spectrophotometer and *computation*, in most cases. The CMBR can also give a good indication as to observer velocity wrt the local vacuum velocity with careful measurement but the effect of the observer and their equipment on the vacuum state needs to be carefully considered. f) Many of the examples posted to this group and in establishment books fail to take account of the above facts and can be misleading both in concept and formulation. Also many of the past formulae are inappropriately applied and have been bringing these formulae into disrepute but correctly applied in the situations for which they were intended they should normally present no problems. Aberration It has been put forward that the apparent leading of a stars position in some way discredits the above facts but this is brought about by the misunderstanding of this effect and its mistaken association with refractive index. In the refractive index situation its a case of an energy front spread over a particle based area being transferred to another particle based area with the wave having to surmount the energy state change that exists between any two particle based materials. the direction of this event is to introduce negative incidence into the wave path. In the case of vacuum to atmosphere the incidence is positive as the mechanism is different. As the ray of light coming from the star interacts with a molecule in the upper atmosphere the atoms of the molecule absorbs the radiation from the star and emits it to the next molecules atoms the main vector of this emission is the vector sum of the light ray from the star and the velocity of the atoms of the molecule. This results in a lead to the observed position and a positive angle. Gravity The examination of gravity as an asymmetric electrical force is detailed below. If we assume for a moment that electrically neutral as a measurement of an atoms state is a mis-measurement and the residual potential imbalance is in fact displayed as gravitational attraction and see how this might be brought about. It would appear that between two identical atoms the potential difference is zero and so provide no mechanism for attraction or repulsion but between three or more atoms the mechanism is fairly clear. Between two atoms the sum of their potential differences rationale to 1 is +2-2= 0 so the field surrounding this pair appears to be zero but in more detail it is a field that falls to zero at some point and sums to +2 at another and -2 at another if another particle then interacts with the original pair the relationship is +2 attracting -1 and -2 attracting +1 the dynamics of the situation means that between three or more particles the potential differential is always attractive as this follows an increasing path and so becomes stronger whereas the repulsive force follows a decreasing path and always becomes weaker. This resulting attractive field differential is quite small but sums with values of the particles to produce gravity. For example if we take three electrons and three positron and take one of the electrons and rotate it round its anti particle to prevent conversion to radiation by mutual annihilation and do the same with the other four particles we have three neutral systems that will follow the mechanism detailed above re potential differences. The dynamics of the systems tend to ensure that the slower element of the potential of the three systems tends to insert itself as a repulsive mediator to ensure that the systems don't interact in a destructive way. Pair rotating round x producing neutral skin made of two charge states. -++- x +--+ (-2+2) + (+2-2) = 0 Three rotating pairs attracting. -++- x +--+ (-2+2) + (+2-2) = a (-2+2) + (+2-2) = c -++- x +--+ -++- x +--+ (-2+2) + (+2-2) = b a+bc so a+b is more positive and negative than c so a+b attracts c Voltage example The pair The singleton +2v | relative to +1v +2v is +1v more positive so +1v is -1v with | +1v respect to +2v which mean that the two fields will attract 0v | | -1v and the same applies -1v and -2v as -1v is +1v more -2v | positive than -2v the fields will attract. Below is an early first attempt to rationalize the above postion of gravity as a potential difference and attempt to include strong, weak and magnetic forces. and shown as an aspect of the same force but of a more complex nature. The position is that the Newtonian and Coulomb laws in the above respect are correct but incomplete. Under development :-) Fg = Gn ((m1+m2)*m3/r^2) M = Fc = kn ((q1+q2)*q3/r^2) = E/c^2 See sci.physics.relativity for the full series under development. Try and include your opinion at no charge :-) if it has sufficient potential :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(ds) is squishy because of near-field effects
( dv ) is squishy because of all the matter that might be contained and the relative motion therein. (do) is squishy because of near-field effects So your electrodymanics has adaquate squishiyness to resolve both postulates of SR. Your "gravity" section looks vaguely like something I saw in thread with myself (Sue) and Ken S. Tucker. The mention of the number 4.17 x x 10^42 seems to have caused both parties to run like scalded dogs. The hasty retreat may have been just simple deferance to the tenacity of the Brits. ;-) Sue... This is a colossal number! http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...es/node25.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sue..." wrote in message oups.com... (ds) is squishy because of near-field effects ( dv ) is squishy because of all the matter that might be contained and the relative motion therein. (do) is squishy because of near-field effects So your electrodymanics has adaquate squishiyness to resolve both postulates of SR. dr Thank for coming back Sue I thought my Brit. focus might have offended you. Your input is valued, I like the new name 'electrodymanics' very appropriate.:-) Just changed the oil on the car etc. When you torque up the drain plug and know that if you don't do it right you will either screw off the thread or leave it lose so it vibrates out then you feel the torque in your wallet.:-) and it cut right to your soul :-) and you understand much :-) s Your "gravity" section looks vaguely like something I saw in thread with myself (Sue) and Ken S. Tucker. dr This is really yours and Ken's work as far as I can tell, I have just interpreted it I hope correctly. s The mention of the number 4.17 x x 10^42 seems to have caused both parties to run like scalded dogs. dr I dont remember that number at the moment.? s The hasty retreat may have been just simple deferance to the tenacity of the Brits. ;-) dr Sorry about the bulldog woof it just my nature and means no harm. Sue... This is a colossal number! http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...es/node25.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() dr Thank for coming back Sue I thought my Brit. focus might have offended you. Your input is valued, I like the new name 'electrodymanics' very appropriate.:-) s Oh ... I don't mind sharing some credit for the term. Perhaps Maxwell, Einstein, Weber and a few other are due a tiny bit of recognition. ;-) d Just changed the oil on the car etc. When you torque up the drain plug and know that if you don't do it right you will either screw off the thread or leave it lose so it vibrates out then you feel the torque in your wallet.:-) and it cut right to your soul :-) and you understand much :-) s Your "gravity" section looks vaguely like something I saw in thread with myself (Sue) and Ken S. Tucker dr This is really yours and Ken's work as far as I can tell, I have just interpreted it I hope correctly. s As always... If it blows the roof off your house, send the lawyers to see Ken S. Tucker. I wouldn't even know how to pick the right color for 4.17 x x 10^42 positrons. dr I dont remember that number at the moment.? s The hasty retreat may have been just simple deferance to the tenacity of the Brits .. ;-) dr Sorry about the bulldog woof it just my nature and means no harm. s It's not the woof... It is trying to find the 1/r^2 in all those notations and doodles. I am still studying it but maybe you can sneak one or two 1/r^2 in the dissertation so us spatially challenged women can get our bearings. ;-) Sue... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sue..." wrote in message ups.com... It's not the woof... It is trying to find the 1/r^2 in all those notations and doodles. I am still studying it but maybe you can sneak one or two 1/r^2 in the dissertation so us spatially challenged women can get our bearings. ;-) dr One coming up please check :-) Sue... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dr ***" wrote in message ... Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. *************** Simplified ***************** The following are simple provable or logically deducible facts a) The speed of light (SOL) is measured constant in vacuum and also in any given medium. Its speed in vacuum is given the designator c. As I already explained to you, ONLY when the medium is at rest wrt the measurement system! Cheers, Harald b) From a) we can also state that the velocity of the measuring equipment is zero with respect to(wrt) the light under measurement if the measurement is c. If that is the case the velocity of the vacuum will also be zero unless in a two way measurement there is a velocity discrepancy between the two paths. For future use the measuring equipment frame velocity will be assigned the variable fv and the vacuum velocity the variable vv. This is to allow for any offset which may need to be calculated in or out. c) The SOL is independent of the velocity of the source as concluding otherwise would require the SOL to be dependant on the velocity of the source which experiments and logic have concluded it is not. Any Doppler shift due to relative motion at a or frequency shift at b fig 1 need to be considered if evaluating relative velocities. There are three dilectrics that the SOL has to be constant in to comply with a) if observing a star and calculating relative velocities. Dielectric of the source = (ds). Of the intevening space/vacuum = (dv) Of the observer = (do) a b Point(p) (ds)( dv )(do) fig1 If (ds),(dv) and (do) have no velocities with respect to each other (the norm.) then, if any disturbances caused by the gravity of (ds) and (do) are calculated out, (do) will observer source (ds) spectral signature(ss) essentially as it was transmitted. If on the other hand (ds) has a velocity relative to (dv)+(do) then this will be shown by the (ss) showing a deviation from the norm when observed by (do). In the case of (ds) and (dv) have no relative velocity and the velocity diferential being in (dv) (do) then (ss) will be changed by this velocity. In another case (ds) and (do) have no velocity wrt each other but have a velocity wrt (dv), this more difficult to measure particularly from (do) with only (ds) as a reference. So for this measurement we need to rotate (ds) and (do) round a some distant point (p) so their angular velocities have a significant difference but they are in line on a line drawn from the axis of rotation(p). The other requirement is that there are many other objects in (dv) to lock its velocity by dependency to these other objects and so give references for the vacuum velocity. Using the observed deviation by (do) from the source (ds) on the inner obit about the point, as a reference against the observed deviation from sources from the clock and anticlock directions, the velocity of (do) can be calculated wrt (dv). d) The conclusion from this is that the constacy of c is maintained by referencing itself to the vacuum velocity in which its being carried in. This indicates that the vacuum can have n number of velocities and that they can be deduced from the velocity of c. It needs to be clearly understood that the vacuum accommodates its velocity to the dominant velocity of dominant matter and/or dominant field in its local area. With the area being defined by the strength and type of effect. e) The observer can from observation of the deviation frequency (spectral shift) of light with a known frequency, determine their velocity with respect to the vacuum and other sources with respect to the vacuum by a spectrophotometer and *computation*, in most cases. The CMBR can also give a good indication as to observer velocity wrt the local vacuum velocity with careful measurement but the effect of the observer and their equipment on the vacuum state needs to be carefully considered. f) Many of the examples posted to this group and in establishment books fail to take account of the above facts and can be misleading both in concept and formulation. Also many of the past formulae are inappropriately applied and have been bringing these formulae into disrepute but correctly applied in the situations for which they were intended they should normally present no problems. Aberration It has been put forward that the apparent leading of a stars position in some way discredits the above facts but this is brought about by the misunderstanding of this effect and its mistaken association with refractive index. In the refractive index situation its a case of an energy front spread over a particle based area being transferred to another particle based area with the wave having to surmount the energy state change that exists between any two particle based materials. the direction of this event is to introduce negative incidence into the wave path. In the case of vacuum to atmosphere the incidence is positive as the mechanism is different. As the ray of light coming from the star interacts with a molecule in the upper atmosphere the atoms of the molecule absorbs the radiation from the star and emits it to the next molecules atoms the main vector of this emission is the vector sum of the light ray from the star and the velocity of the atoms of the molecule. This results in a lead to the observed position and a positive angle. Gravity The examination of gravity as an asymmetric electrical force is detailed below. If we assume for a moment that electrically neutral as a measurement of an atoms state is a mis-measurement and the residual potential imbalance is in fact displayed as gravitational attraction and see how this might be brought about. It would appear that between two identical atoms the potential difference is zero and so provide no mechanism for attraction or repulsion but between three or more atoms the mechanism is fairly clear. Between two atoms the sum of their potential differences rationale to 1 is +2-2= 0 so the field surrounding this pair appears to be zero but in more detail it is a field that falls to zero at some point and sums to +2 at another and -2 at another if another particle then interacts with the original pair the relationship is +2 attracting -1 and -2 attracting +1 the dynamics of the situation means that between three or more particles the potential differential is always attractive as this follows an increasing path and so becomes stronger whereas the repulsive force follows a decreasing path and always becomes weaker. This resulting attractive field differential is quite small but sums with values of the particles to produce gravity. For example if we take three electrons and three positron and take one of the electrons and rotate it round its anti particle to prevent conversion to radiation by mutual annihilation and do the same with the other four particles we have three neutral systems that will follow the mechanism detailed above re potential differences. The dynamics of the systems tend to ensure that the slower element of the potential of the three systems tends to insert itself as a repulsive mediator to ensure that the systems don't interact in a destructive way. Pair rotating round x producing neutral skin made of two charge states. -++- x +--+ (-2+2) + (+2-2) = 0 Three rotating pairs attracting. -++- x +--+ (-2+2) + (+2-2) = a (-2+2) + (+2-2) = c -++- x +--+ -++- x +--+ (-2+2) + (+2-2) = b a+bc so a+b is more positive and negative than c so a+b attracts c Voltage example The pair The singleton +2v | relative to +1v +2v is +1v more positive so +1v is -1v with | +1v respect to +2v which mean that the two fields will attract 0v | | -1v and the same applies -1v and -2v as -1v is +1v more -2v | positive than -2v the fields will attract. Below is an early first attempt to rationalize the above postion of gravity as a potential difference and attempt to include strong, weak and magnetic forces. and shown as an aspect of the same force but of a more complex nature. The position is that the Newtonian and Coulomb laws in the above respect are correct but incomplete. Under development :-) Fg = Gn ((m1+m2)*m3/r^2) M = Fc = kn ((q1+q2)*q3/r^2) = E/c^2 See sci.physics.relativity for the full series under development. Try and include your opinion at no charge :-) if it has sufficient potential :-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry" wrote in message ... "Dr ***" wrote in message ... Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. *************** Simplified ***************** The following are simple provable or logically deducible facts a) The speed of light (SOL) is measured constant in vacuum and also in any given medium. Its speed in vacuum is given the designator c. As I already explained to you, ONLY when the medium is at rest wrt the measurement system! dr You should have read b) and it got more interesting latter. Cheers Dr Ardvark I'll have another :-) Cheers, Harald |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dr ***" wrote in message ... "Harry" wrote in message ... "Dr ***" wrote in message ... Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. *************** Simplified ***************** The following are simple provable or logically deducible facts a) The speed of light (SOL) is measured constant in vacuum and also in any given medium. Its speed in vacuum is given the designator c. As I already explained to you, ONLY when the medium is at rest wrt the measurement system! In a medium, the speed is c/n where n is the refractive index. George |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Dishman" wrote in message ... "Dr ***" wrote in message ... "Harry" wrote in message ... "Dr ***" wrote in message ... Vacuum, Velocity, Gravity and the Speed of light. *************** Simplified ***************** The following are simple provable or logically deducible facts a) The speed of light (SOL) is measured constant in vacuum and also in any given medium. Its speed in vacuum is given the designator c. As I already explained to you, ONLY when the medium is at rest wrt the measurement system! In a medium, the speed is c/n where n is the refractive index. dr Thanks George |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:29:57 +0100, in uk.sci.astronomy , "Dr ***"
wrote: As I already explained to you, ONLY when the medium is at rest wrt the measurement system! 1) no you didn't, you need to learn to post. 2) you're a troll. Go away. -- Mark McIntyre CLC FAQ http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html CLC readme: http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Astral Space part 2 - Crookes work | Majestyk | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 14th 04 09:44 AM |
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) | expert | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 13th 04 12:05 PM |
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) | expert | Misc | 0 | April 13th 04 12:05 PM |
Chapter 4 Part 5 | nuke | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 3rd 04 07:30 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |