Univeral contant might not be constant

http://www.universetoday.com/am/publ...t.html?1142005

More details here

http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~mim/res.html

From Ray V.:

http://www.universetoday.com/am/publ...t.html?1142005

More details here

http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~mim/res.htm

Hmm.. the Void-Spacers might well be asking themselves, what
property/properties of their 'Nothing' could possibly be CAUSING a
change in the fine structure constant (and posibly c) over cosmological
time? oc

"Bill Sheppard" wrote in message
...
From Ray V.:


http://www.universetoday.com/am/publ...t.html?1142005

More details here

http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~mim/res.htm

Hmm.. the Void-Spacers might well be asking themselves, what
property/properties of their 'Nothing' could possibly be CAUSING a
change in the fine structure constant (and posibly c) over
cosmological
time? oc
Bill,
I thought you were emphatic that c definitely DID change over
cosmological time; don't tell me you're not so sure!.

OG

Ray Vingnutte wrote in
news


http://www.universetoday.com/am/publ...t_not.html?114
2005

More details here

http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~mim/res.html

These are the same guys that made a similar claim a couple of years ago
which was subsequently debunked. They are now back with a claim for a
much smaller change to the fine structure constant. I wonder if it will
stand up this time?

Klazmon.