![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the sake of argument, let's say an astronaut conduction an EVA
slipped out of the foot harnessed and started to float away. The only way to resuce is for the shuttle to undock from the ISS and go get the astronaut. How quickly could the shuttle do this? And how would an astronaut be rescued if this happened during an EVA with not shuttle present? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Lopa wrote in :
For the sake of argument, let's say an astronaut conduction an EVA slipped out of the foot harnessed and started to float away. For the sake of argument, we must also assume that the astronaut failed to follow dual-tether protocol in order for this to happen. An EVA astronaut is *never* secured by *only* a foot harness. The only way to resuce is for the shuttle to undock from the ISS and go get the astronaut. How quickly could the shuttle do this? In the normal shuttle-ISS EVA configuration, about twenty minutes. If the configuration were changed to get some undocking prep done in advance (shuttle powered up, hatches closed, vestibule (but not the shuttle airlock) depressurized), this time could be cut to as little as three minutes. (Mind you, undocking would *not* be the first resort - the crews would attempt to use the SRMS and/or SSRMS to retrieve the floating crewmember first.) And how would an astronaut be rescued if this happened during an EVA with not shuttle present? During a US EVA, the astronaut activates SAFER and flies back to station. The Russian EVA suits do not yet have an analogous system. They rely completely on dual-tether protocol to prevent this from happening in the first place. EVA training puts a *strong* emphasis on this. Like rock- climbing, job one is *always* to know where your tethers are. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Lopa writes:
For the sake of argument, let's say an astronaut conduction an EVA slipped out of the foot harnessed and started to float away. The only way to resuce is for the shuttle to undock from the ISS and go get the astronaut. This is false, at least for US suits. US suits can carry SAFER for EVA's, which makes it possible for the astronaut to save himself. http://nasaexplores.nasa.gov/show2_9...=03-050&gl=912 And how would an astronaut be rescued if this happened during an EVA with not shuttle present? Obviously SAFER handles this situation. If you're using Russian suits, I'm sure you pay very careful attention to having a secure connection to ISS. Jeff -- Remove "no" and "spam" from email address to reply. If it says "This is not spam!", it's surely a lie. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message ...
During a US EVA, the astronaut activates SAFER and flies back to station. The Russian EVA suits do not yet have an analogous system. "Ustanovka Samospasenya Kosmonavtov" (U.S.K.)? http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRhe...06/FR0306a.htm Though was the USK onboard the I.S.S.? http://au.geocities.com/kosmonavtka2/sea_eagle.html They rely completely on dual-tether protocol to prevent this from happening in the first place. EVA training puts a *strong* emphasis on this. Like rock-climbing, job one is *always* to know where your tethers are. Rock climbing at a height of around 400 km. SAFER/USK or no SAFER/USK, the tethers are very important. Jet backpacks after all is not mandatory for high-rise building costruction, scaffolding on the other hand. Anyway. I don't think that they should let people do this sort of things too much. Humanoid robotic worker should be used, the space station be should made as modular as possible, and most of the space station servicing should be able be done from the inside. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Lopa wrote in message ...
For the sake of argument, let's say an astronaut conduction an EVA slipped out of the foot harnessed and started to float away. The only way to resuce is for the shuttle to undock from the ISS and go get the astronaut. How quickly could the shuttle do this? And how would an astronaut be rescued if this happened during an EVA with not shuttle present? What would you use to rescue someone that fell overboard? A lifeboat or a frigate? A lifeboat of course! And the I.S.S.'s current lifeboat is... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jorge R. Frank" wrote in message ... (EAC) wrote in "The USK, Cosmonaut Self-Rescue Device, was not yet onboard, so it has not Ok, that's really bad when you read that as "Cosmonaut Self-Destruct Device" been worn during any Orlan vykhody to date." This is still true, AFAIK. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Manifest | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 2 | February 2nd 04 10:55 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Manifest | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 6th 03 02:59 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |