A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SCT Balance -- Fork Weights?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 25th 05, 05:35 PM
Davoud
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SCT Balance -- Fork Weights?

I have seen a number of photos in which there is a weight of some sort
on either fork arm of an SCT. Is this necessary for a 'scope that is
used within a few degrees of the meridian? Am I correct in assuming
that the weight is placed on the west arm if the 'scope is inclined
significantly to the east and vice-versa? TIA!

Davoud

--
usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
  #2  
Old March 25th 05, 05:51 PM
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:35:04 -0500, Davoud wrote:

I have seen a number of photos in which there is a weight of some sort
on either fork arm of an SCT. Is this necessary for a 'scope that is
used within a few degrees of the meridian? Am I correct in assuming
that the weight is placed on the west arm if the 'scope is inclined
significantly to the east and vice-versa? TIA!


Davoud-

The weight is important with most fork mounts. You want the east side
heavier than the west side. This is so that the RA drive is always
pushing towards the west, rather than pulling. If you are pulling,
stiction can cause the motion to stop and start.

At least with Meade mounts, the declination motor is on the west side,
so these mounts are naturally heavier on that side. It takes several
pounds on the east arm to offset this and ensure good guiding.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
  #3  
Old March 26th 05, 11:02 PM
Davoud
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Davoud:
I have seen a number of photos in which there is a weight of some sort
on either fork arm of an SCT. Is this necessary for a 'scope that is
used within a few degrees of the meridian? Am I correct in assuming
that the weight is placed on the west arm if the 'scope is inclined
significantly to the east and vice-versa? TIA!


Chris L Peterson:
The weight is important with most fork mounts. You want the east side
heavier than the west side. This is so that the RA drive is always
pushing towards the west, rather than pulling. If you are pulling,
stiction can cause the motion to stop and start.

At least with Meade mounts, the declination motor is on the west side,
so these mounts are naturally heavier on that side. It takes several
pounds on the east arm to offset this and ensure good guiding.


Thanks for the elucidation. I read from the pushing-pulling information
that a weight is desirable even if the 'scope is used over a fairly
narrow range of R.A.'s near the meridian. Now to decide what to use as
a weight.

Thanks again,

Davoud

--
usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Astral Space part 2 - Crookes work Majestyk Astronomy Misc 1 April 14th 04 09:44 AM
Astral Space part 2 - Crookes work Majestyk Misc 1 April 14th 04 09:44 AM
Astral Space part 2 - Crookes work Majestyk UK Astronomy 1 April 14th 04 09:44 AM
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) expert Misc 0 April 13th 04 12:05 PM
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) expert UK Astronomy 0 April 13th 04 12:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.