![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is our heavy lift capability now? Excluding the Shuttle? I think
the Saturn V could heave 100 tons into low Earth orbit, 52 tons to the moon. Is it also true that the Apollo CM could have been modified for six people just for transfer to orbit and back? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote in
: What is our heavy lift capability now? Excluding the Shuttle? I think the Saturn V could heave 100 tons into low Earth orbit, 52 tons to the moon. Is it also true that the Apollo CM could have been modified for six people just for transfer to orbit and back? Titan is no longer available; it was replaced by the Delta IV Heavy which has a payload of 25 tons to low orbit. This could almost be doubled with upgrades; with major upgrades payload might increase to 90 tons or so. Atlas V Heavy could be used in the same way. http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/...bls/flash.html Shuttle components could be used without the orbiter for heavy lift as well; this is called Shuttle-C or Shuttle- Derived. Payloads would be similar to the uprated Delta IV or Atlas V. I don't know exactly what was proposed for Apollo; after Shuttle other manned vehicle will take over the role of transporting humans into space. They might resemble an enlarged Apollo capsule. Or not. --Damon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill" wrote in message
... What is our heavy lift capability now? Excluding the Shuttle? I think the Saturn V could heave 100 tons into low Earth orbit, 52 tons to the moon. Is it also true that the Apollo CM could have been modified for six people just for transfer to orbit and back? The US has two EELV launchers (e.g. developed to Air Force specifications in 1990s to largely replace Titan and Atlas). .... not counting SeaLaunch/Zenit or its derivatives. http://www.spaceandtech.com/spacedat...enit_sum.shtml Lockheed Martin - Atlas 5 (various versions) http://www.spaceandtech.com/spacedat...las5_sum.shtml Boeing - Delta 4 (I believe Delta 4 Heavy has top life capability) http://www.spaceandtech.com/spacedat...lta4_sum.shtml Boeing reworked the Cape Launch Pad 37 facilities (old Saturn 1B launch pads) Lockheed Martin reworked Cape Launch Pad 41 (old Titan III and IV launch pad) http://www.space.com/missionlaunches...v_020825b.html Cape Launch ad 40 is scheduled to launch the last Titan IV in next few weeks (end of era) http://www.spaceandtech.com/spacedat...an4b_sum.shtml At Vandenberg, Lockheed Martin is currently reworking a launch pad (old Atlas?) and Boeing reworked the SLC 6 pad (original AF MOL program and Shuttle SLC-6 facility) Maybe 100 tones to LEO will be developed again - maybe using common parts from these 2 launchers -- I hope so -- the current need is likely 3 to 4 a year. "Build it .. and they will come" gb |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill" wrote in message
... I think the Saturn V could heave 100 tons into low Earth orbit... Is it also true that the Apollo CM could have been modified for six people just for transfer to orbit and back? The Saturn V could lift roughly 140 tons to LEO: http://history.msfc.nasa.gov/saturnV/Introduction.pdf A kit was developed for the Apollo CM that provided five couches for a possible Skylab rescue mission. This was nearly used during Skylab 3, when a service module RCS problem initiated rescue preparations. The problem was later solved so the rescue wasn't needed. http://www.astronautix.com/craft/apouecsm.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "gb" wrote in message ... "Build it .. and they will come" They built it, and few came. gb |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill wrote: What is our heavy lift capability now? Excluding the Shuttle? I think the Saturn V could heave 100 tons into low Earth orbit, 52 tons to the moon. Depends a little on the assumptions you make, and on which flavor of "ton" you're using. Using the metric ton like civilized people :-), Saturn V payload to LEO was about 119t, to a lunar trajectory about 50t. Titan IVB could insert 21.7t into a *very* low orbit (so low that you would have to raise it further immediately). However, it's essentially defunct now -- the production line is closed and the very last launch is imminent. The Heavy configurations of the EELVs -- Atlas V and Delta IV -- have broadly similar capabilities. Atlas V Heavy is still a paper rocket at the moment, LockMart having postponed development after failing to win any business for it, but its payload to LEO is nominally 29t. Delta IV Heavy is real, although it has flown only once so far and that flight had some problems; it's rated at about 24t to LEO. Various upgraded EELV configurations could *theoretically* do rather better, although getting them up beyond 40-50t tends to require so much "upgrading" that they would be essentially new rockets and would need considerable development work. Is it also true that the Apollo CM could have been modified for six people just for transfer to orbit and back? The CM could fairly easily be modified to hold six people for *emergency* return -- the Skylab "rescue" configuration held five plus a small cargo pallet. However, an accidental land touchdown in that configuration would probably involve serious injury to all aboard, because the extra space was mostly taken out of space normally reserved for the shock-absorber stroke of the couch assembly. The safety margins are too thin to use that configuration routinely as a crew ferry. With a revised interior, and braking rockets if you wanted routine land touchdown (this was studied early in Apollo), yes, it should be feasible. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Spencer wrote:
Saturn V payload to LEO was about 119t... This needs some qualification. In theory all 3 stages of the Saturn V could orbit this amount but the third (S-IVB) stage could not support this massive a payload. In practice you would be limited to the first two stages (a la Skylab) and the LEO payload falls to about 100t or 220,000 lbs. You will also see the Saturn V payload variously quoted at 130 tonnes or 140 tons or 285,000 lbs or something similar. This is derived from the mass of the partially fuelled S-IVB - Apollo spacecraft combination in LEO parking orbit which of course isn't all discretionary payload so is not really comparable to the LEO payloads of other launchers. Jim Davis |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:56:07 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: They built it, and few came. ....Please, let's keep the group sex jokes to a dull thud. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damon Hill wrote:
Titan is no longer available; it was replaced by the Delta IV Heavy which has a payload of 25 tons to low orbit. This could almost be doubled with upgrades; with major upgrades payload might increase to 90 tons or so. Atlas V Heavy could be used in the same way. They may be out of production but at least one Titan's available. In fact, one (T4b) is on pad 40 right now and is set to hoist a KH-12 variant up early next month, on or around the 9th I believe... T3 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UA's Cassini Scientists Ready for First Close Titan Flyby | er | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 26th 04 07:14 AM |
UA's Cassini Scientists Ready for First Close Titan Flyby | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 25th 04 08:35 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
NASA artist illustrations and cutaways of Saturn vehicles | Rusty Barton | History | 3 | August 24th 03 10:39 AM |