![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray Thanks for that site. Telling us that there ar stars in the halo of
our galaxy that are 12 billion years old fits well with my estimate of the universe's age of 22 billion years. Andromeda is bigger and older than the Milky Way,and that means the chance of intelligent life there has better odds in forming then here,and more of it. Bert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Ray Thanks for that site. Telling us that there ar stars in the halo of our galaxy that are 12 billion years old fits well with my estimate of the universe's age of 22 billion years. Andromeda is bigger and older than the Milky Way,and that means the chance of intelligent life there has better odds in forming then here,and more of it. Bert Much data and much scientific discourse has gone into the 13.7 B yr estimate, Bert. All are willing to reconsider -- given sufficient new data you have uncovered. Come now, mustn't keep us waiting in suspense. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Ray Thanks for that site. Telling us that there ar stars in the halo of our galaxy that are 12 billion years old fits well with my estimate of the universe's age of 22 billion years. Andromeda is bigger and older than the Milky Way,and that means the chance of intelligent life there has better odds in forming then here,and more of it. Bert i'm sure the age of the universe will be revised 1000 times in the next 1000 years. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Could galactic find be Andromeda's food? (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 9th 04 06:58 PM |