A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Contact poles on LM



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 10th 04, 09:38 PM
Rusty B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Contact poles on LM

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:22:29 -0400, Jud McCranie
wrote:

I noticed that on the Apollo 9 and 10 LMs, there are the contact

poles
below all four footpads. On A11, the front leg doesn't have one.

Was
this to eliminate the possibility of it interfering with the
astronauts path up and down the ladder?


The landing probe was removed from the front landing leg of Eagle
and later LM's to prevent it being a hazard to the astronauts.

Here is a picture from Apollo 12 showing one of its probes that
snapped
off and was sticking up in the vacuum (can't say air). If this had
been on the leg with the ladder, its possible the probe might caused
them to fall or puncture a spacesuit.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...12-47-6907.jpg

"That's one small goose for (a) man, one giant geese for mankind!"

8-/

- Rusty Barton
  #2  
Old September 11th 04, 01:46 AM
Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rusty B" wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:22:29 -0400, Jud McCranie
wrote:

I noticed that on the Apollo 9 and 10 LMs, there are the contact

poles
below all four footpads. On A11, the front leg doesn't have one.

Was
this to eliminate the possibility of it interfering with the
astronauts path up and down the ladder?


The landing probe was removed from the front landing leg of Eagle
and later LM's to prevent it being a hazard to the astronauts.

Here is a picture from Apollo 12 showing one of its probes that
snapped
off and was sticking up in the vacuum (can't say air). If this had
been on the leg with the ladder, its possible the probe might caused
them to fall or puncture a spacesuit.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...12-47-6907.jpg


Bah, see that proves the landing was fake. There's not crater! :-)



  #3  
Old September 11th 04, 04:49 AM
Jud McCranie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 00:46:14 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote:

Bah, see that proves the landing was fake. There's not crater! :-)


I think that's the best picture of a blast crater from the LM that
I've seen.


---
Replace you know what by j to email
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Contact poles on LM Jud McCranie History 1 September 10th 04 09:30 PM
optics-zone Gaz Amateur Astronomy 4 August 25th 04 11:49 PM
Arecibo Radar Shows No Evidence of Thick Ice At Lunar Poles Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 0 November 12th 03 06:02 PM
Arecibo Radar Shows No Evidence of Thick Ice At Lunar Poles Ron Baalke Science 0 November 12th 03 06:02 PM
"The Eagle has landed" NOT! Jay Windley Misc 0 August 16th 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.