![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I read about the wing sensors that would be installed before the Return to Flight of the shuttle. Not specificaly for the shuttle, but for any winged spacecraft: Would it be possible to detect a wing impact in almost realtime, get an instant replay from the video sources at slow motion at the time of impact to the backroom guys, and come up with a decision while in launch? Is it possible to install equipment that can positively give enough information to suspect shielding damage? I figure that any real-time impact decision would lead either to an ATO or RTLS. Do you think it should even be considred to attempt RTLS without knowing exactly if and what damage occured? I'm not advocating any position over the other, just wonder if it could, technicaly, be possible. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"remedy Villeneuve" wrote in message
om... | Hi, | | I read about the wing sensors that would be installed before the | Return to Flight of the shuttle. | | Not specifically for the shuttle, but for any winged spacecraft: | | Would it be possible to detect a wing impact in almost realtime, get | an instant replay from the video sources at slow motion at the time of | impact to the backroom guys, and come up with a decision while in | launch? | | Is it possible to install equipment that can positively give enough | information to suspect shielding damage? | | I figure that any real-time impact decision would lead either to an | ATO or RTLS. Do you think it should even be considered to attempt RTLS | without knowing exactly if and what damage occurred? | | I'm not advocating any position over the other, just wonder if it | could, technically, be possible. For what it is worth, there are so many maybe's i don't see how anyone could call it at this stage. I imagine, when you realise that many launch abort modes have never been attempted, that the bias will be to carry on unless concrete evidence of bad damage is spotted. After all, if the damage is bad, you may not be able to fly the thing sufficiently to do the abort manoeuvre! I would imagine that a great deal will be done to stop anything coming off the tank during launch, so they can view any damage after the mission and see if they can figure where it came from, then improve monitoring to spot it, or improve the adhesion of whatever came off... Something they really should have done years ago, but I'm not a finger waggler. It is easy to be wise after the event of course. Brian -- Brian Gaff.... graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________ __________________________________ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free, so there! Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.557 / Virus Database: 349 - Release Date: 30/12/03 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA To Embed Sensors In Shuttle Wings | Rusty B | Space Shuttle | 32 | December 17th 03 05:37 AM |
COBRA BRASS family of sensors | Allen Thomson | Space Science Misc | 1 | September 23rd 03 04:04 PM |
Shuttle Foam Test Yields Hole in Wing - Associated Press | Rusty B | Space Shuttle | 29 | August 12th 03 03:30 AM |
Columbia Investigators Fire Foam Insulation at Shuttle Wing, Blowing Open 2-Foot Hole; The crowd of about 100 gasped and cried, "Wow!" when the foam hit. | Jay | Space Shuttle | 32 | July 12th 03 02:41 AM |
NASA: Gases Breached Wing of Shuttle Atlantis in 2000 | Rusty Barton | Space Shuttle | 2 | July 10th 03 01:27 AM |