![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First off...
I've been a long time star gazer and I can read a star map and know my way around the sky with out the map. I understand setting up a telescope manually to use map coordinates to find objects with out a finder scope. But...I have always had cheap telescopes or binoculars growing up. Recently I purchased a Discovery stores Sky and Land 70mm refractor for my son along with a Clestron lens kit from telescopes.com. I plan on using the lens with my soon to be purchased telescope. I was able to show my son Saturn and Jupiter also fuzzy comet Machholz. The new lens really improved my sons telescope. But I want something better, much better for myself. Now my questions, errr plea for help... I know you all get tired of seeing these post but I don't have anyone or know anyone to help guide me on this purchase. I'm interested in buying a telescope for DSO. My main use would be educating my kids, showing friends and family and exploring random spots, maybe find my own comet. Let me dream =) I would also like to do astrophotography using a web cam. I understand aperture is the most important thing. But I want a portable system I can put in the back of my midsize suv and setup by myself. I'm in the military so it would be packed up and shipped every 3+ years. So it would need to be rugged. Although I only have 8 years left till I retire I might be better off waiting on the massive aperture scope. Thoughts? I'm considering the Meade ETX-125PE since it looks good for portability and web cam astrophotography. Plus it should be ready to use pretty quickly. It appears to be fairly rugged compared to other designs. Dobs look good for the price. But they are so cheap which sort of scares me. Also the mount system looks like I have to manually move the scope which could make finding DSO a real burden. Is this correct? Astrophotography possible with these? Truss mounts like teeters telescopes planet killers look very tempting due to the huge apertures. Has anyone used these? Are they worth it? Can 1 person set these up alone? Are these manual moving only? Can you do astophotography with these scopes? I do apologize I'm just lost in all this. Does anyone have any other suggestion or know a website that has plenty of reviews? Thanks all! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since you basically know the sky, the cheap Dob type scope in a 6" or larger
size with a Telerad or Rigel finder will do you very nicely. Consider getting the largest scope you can for what money you have. You will appreciate the better light gathering that the larger scope has when you get out there looking at things. The littler scopes with GPS and so forth are nice toys but you spend a lot of money on things that don't really do much for the light getting to the eye. -- Why isn't there an Ozone Hole at the NORTH Pole? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:25:46 +0000, RavenX wrote:
Sounds like you need a 8" SCT. Portable, astrophotography capable, easy to setup (cool down sux), very rugged with a JMI case. www.buytelescopes.com should have plenty of reviews as well as www.cloudynights.com Luck, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dobs look good for the price. But they are so cheap which sort of
scares me. Also the mount system looks like I have to manually move the scope which could make finding DSO a real burden. Is this correct? Astrophotography possible with these? A newtonian/dobsonian provides views as good or better than same size scopes of other designs, and their relative low cost makes them a tremendous value. They are not easily adapted for astrophotography. Finding stuff is not a big deal if you have access to reasonably dark skies, and in fact is a part of astronomy that many observers (my sons and me included) enjoy a lot. However, the best advice is to seek out an astro club local to you and attend some star parties. You can look through all kinds of scopes and talk about equipment and observing all night. Then, you can decide for yourself. Dennis |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RavenX" wrote in message ... I'm interested in buying a telescope for DSO. 6" aperture minimum, 8" or larger recommended My main use would be educating my kids, showing friends and family and exploring random spots, maybe find my own comet. Let me dream =) I would also like to do astrophotography using a web cam. Sorry, but this is a conflict of interests. Exploring is something that is best done with a simple altazimuth mount, like the Dob, or any scope on a non EQ mount. OTOH, keeping an object in the eyepiece, or in the Camera is the purpose of an EQ mount. I understand aperture is the most important thing. But I want a portable system I can put in the back of my midsize suv and setup by myself. I'm in the military so it would be packed up and shipped every 3+ years. So it would need to be rugged. Although I only have 8 years left till I retire I might be better off waiting on the massive aperture scope. Thoughts? An 8" F6 Dob isn't massive. Nor is an 8" SCT on a mount like the Unistar from Universal Astronomics. Although you _will_ need to allocate space. I'm considering the Meade ETX-125PE since it looks good for portability and web cam astrophotography. Plus it should be ready to use pretty quickly. It appears to be fairly rugged compared to other designs. Well, as nice as this scope might be, because of it's long focal length, it is limited to a narrow field of view, as well as falling below the 6" minimum for DSO's. Sort of a double whammy unless you are okay with those limitations. Dobs look good for the price. But they are so cheap which sort of scares me. Also the mount system looks like I have to manually move the scope which could make finding DSO a real burden. Is this correct? I just spent some time procuring and setting up a GoTo German Equatorial mount for my 4" F9 refractor. I also intend to get a larger aperture scope for this mount at a later date. Funny thing.... last night I just wanted to take a quick tour of objects at well known locations, which is a perfect task for the 4" refractor. But, I didn't want to carry out the GEM and battery, and go through the alignment proceuder, so instead I pulled the GEM head off the tripod, popped on the UniStar Light altazimuth head, attached the 4" refractor and went out to poke around. Believe it or not, that swap procedure takes less time than setting up and aligning the GoTo. ;-) The main point of course being that if you are under the gun to get outside and poke around for a half hour or so, nothing beats having some knowledge of where to look, and a simple Up/Down, Left/Right mount (altazimuth). For showing things to others, few will have the patience to stand around while you align the GoTo computer. This task takes time. Equally though, folks will not want to stand around for 10 minutes while you search in vain for an object to observe. The best advice is to get yourself a scope, learn how to aim, and then start showing others. You suggest that you are familiar with the sky, so all you need do is become familiar with the process of aiming a scope. Astrophotography possible with these? That's a big, expensive, work-filled word. Imaging is not a task you can enter lightly. It requires a good mount, a CCD, and software and computer skills. Put it off for later. Truss mounts like teeters telescopes planet killers look very tempting due to the huge apertures. Has anyone used these? Are they worth it? Can 1 person set these up alone? Are these manual moving only? Can you do astophotography with these scopes? I do apologize I'm just lost in all this. Slow down. Start simple. Work your way into it. Even though I started out with a small GoTo scope like the ETX series, I prefer to use a manual altazimuth mounted scope for "point and look" observing, whether it's my 12.5" Solid Tube Monster Dob, or my 4" F9 ED refractor. Manual tracking is only a bother at "planet" (high) powers. Better than 90% of deep sky observing is done at mid to low power. Get an 8" F6 Dobsonian, and don't look back. Later, if you want to do imaging, add a second "imaging" setup to experiment with. If you stick with it, great. If you don't, well even if you do, you will still want that 8" F6 Dob for simple poking around the sky. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Paul wrote:
Get an 8" F6 Dobsonian, and don't look back. Later, if you want to do imaging, add a second "imaging" setup to experiment with. If you stick with it, great. If you don't, well even if you do, you will still want that 8" F6 Dob for simple poking around the sky. I'd concur with just about everything that Stephen says here, including the recommendation of an 8" dob. You'll probably want to move up to something larger later, but for the money it simply can't be beat. As for imaging, a dob is not the answer. You can buy an equatorial platform so that it will track, but my experience is that for astrophotography your results will always improve with mass and simplicity in the mounting: mass to provide a solid platform, and simplicity to eliminate as many moving parts as possible. An eq platform for a dob fails on both accounts. Unless you buy a real dog of an instrument optically, you'll never come close to finding its limits until it's on an enormous, massive equatorial mounting. However, while few people take Hubble telescope pix from their backyards, that's no reason not to experiment with imaging. I personally find it a real kick, despite its drawbacks. And if you think it's tough now, current technology makes it a piece of cake compared to twenty years ago. I think that Stephen is too much of a perfectionist in this regard - I'm not. So buy your inexpensive dob and enjoy it, and save your money for something with a little more imaging potential down the line - it might simply be a big eq mount to put your dob on, as an 8" f/6 is a nice, versatile scope for taking pictures. Best of luck, and welcome - Chris |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A purchased my first scope 2 years ago. A Schmidt-Newtonian. Works
great and all but if I knew then what I know now. It would have been a Dob all the way. I have been to a few observing sessions with some members of a local astronomy club. One had a 12 classic Dob like the one's Meade and Celestron sells. And another member used a Truss Dob. All of which were needed to be moved manually. The Truss Dob had an NGC-Max digital setting circles but we did not use them. The Truss Dob was a 20" Obsession. I found myself at this scope more then any. Probably because of the large aperture. But they are kind of expensive for me. The 12" brought out some great detail also. The 12" Dob is what I would go with. Then save for something bigger. On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:25:46 +0000, RavenX wrote: First off... I've been a long time star gazer and I can read a star map and know my way around the sky with out the map. I understand setting up a telescope manually to use map coordinates to find objects with out a finder scope. But...I have always had cheap telescopes or binoculars growing up. Recently I purchased a Discovery stores Sky and Land 70mm refractor for my son along with a Clestron lens kit from telescopes.com. I plan on using the lens with my soon to be purchased telescope. I was able to show my son Saturn and Jupiter also fuzzy comet Machholz. The new lens really improved my sons telescope. But I want something better, much better for myself. Now my questions, errr plea for help... I know you all get tired of seeing these post but I don't have anyone or know anyone to help guide me on this purchase. I'm interested in buying a telescope for DSO. My main use would be educating my kids, showing friends and family and exploring random spots, maybe find my own comet. Let me dream =) I would also like to do astrophotography using a web cam. I understand aperture is the most important thing. But I want a portable system I can put in the back of my midsize suv and setup by myself. I'm in the military so it would be packed up and shipped every 3+ years. So it would need to be rugged. Although I only have 8 years left till I retire I might be better off waiting on the massive aperture scope. Thoughts? I'm considering the Meade ETX-125PE since it looks good for portability and web cam astrophotography. Plus it should be ready to use pretty quickly. It appears to be fairly rugged compared to other designs. Dobs look good for the price. But they are so cheap which sort of scares me. Also the mount system looks like I have to manually move the scope which could make finding DSO a real burden. Is this correct? Astrophotography possible with these? Truss mounts like teeters telescopes planet killers look very tempting due to the huge apertures. Has anyone used these? Are they worth it? Can 1 person set these up alone? Are these manual moving only? Can you do astophotography with these scopes? I do apologize I'm just lost in all this. Does anyone have any other suggestion or know a website that has plenty of reviews? Thanks all! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord "RavenX" wrote in message ... First off... I've been a long time star gazer and I can read a star map and know my way around the sky with out the map. I understand setting up a telescope manually to use map coordinates to find objects with out a finder scope. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darn! Starlord beat me to it. Then again, it IS his site.
Start he http://home.inreach.com/starlord Read the whole thing. It explains a lot and there are some tradeoffs you need to make right off the back. You have some conflicting desires. This isn't good or bad, it just is. Some specific answers (they are NOT a substitute for reading the above) are below. I'm interested in buying a telescope for DSO. Stop right here. This means aperature, the more the better. In a bang for buck world, you are now talking Dob, 8" and up. My main use would be educating my kids, showing friends and family and exploring random spots, maybe find my own comet. Let me dream =) I would also like to do astrophotography using a web cam. Stop again. Astrophotography and "Dob" don't mix. You are now talking about something mounted on an aligned mount, preferably with some kind of tracking (or a software field derotater). I understand aperture is the most important thing. Not necessarily. This depends on what you want to look at. For DSO's, you are right. You want light gathering power. But I want a portable system I can put in the back of my midsize suv and setup by myself. I'm in the military so it would be packed up and shipped every 3+ years. So it would need to be rugged. Although I only have 8 years left till I retire I might be better off waiting on the massive aperture scope. Thoughts? Careful packaging. Seriously. Almost any telescope will survive this given a little care. I'm considering the Meade ETX-125PE since it looks good for portability and web cam astrophotography. Plus it should be ready to use pretty quickly. It appears to be fairly rugged compared to other designs. A bit small for serious DSO observing. Dobs look good for the price. But they are so cheap which sort of scares me. Also the mount system looks like I have to manually move the scope which could make finding DSO a real burden. Is this correct? Astrophotography possible with these? First, the cheap price is the idea. They are a quality optical system in a simple case and mount. All your money goes into optics and nothing into frills. DO NOT be scared of dobs. Finding DSO's in a dob isn't a problem once you learn the sky. The very best telescopes I see for observing DSO's are high end, large dobs. Oh, but you can pretty well forget astrophptography with these. Truss mounts like teeters telescopes planet killers look very tempting due to the huge apertures. Has anyone used these? Are they worth it? Can 1 person set these up alone? Are these manual moving only? Can you do astophotography with these scopes? This kind of depends on the size. remember, most truss mount scopes are just dobs with a different tube design. Most are manual moving only (you can automate them, but it is expensive) and how many people it takes to set them up depends on the size. The primaries tend to be VERY heavy. Oh, and you can pretty well forget astrophotography with these. I do apologize I'm just lost in all this. Does anyone have any other suggestion or know a website that has plenty of reviews? My suggestions: 1. First, read StarLord's article. 2. Find a local astronomy club. If you are in the San Diego Area, check out the SDAA website. If you are elsewhere, let us know where and we can try to hook you up with somebody. Check out as many telescopes as you can, look through them, and ask questions. Figure out what you might be interested in by looking through scopes to the greatest extent possible. 3. As for your needs, depending on the price you are looking at, I would suggest: a. A SCT in the 8-10 inch class. I'd mount it on a GEM, but the forks work as well if you don't mind dealing with a wedge once you want to do photography. These will be a bit more expensive, but are relatively small and easy to handle. This would be something like can be seen he http://www.celestron.com/prod_pgs/tel/c914sgt.htm This type of scope is very popular and comes in a wide variety of flavors. b. A newtonian reflector mounted on a GEM in the 8-10" class. This will be half the price of a SGT. It will, however, require a bit more "care and feeding" and will be a bit larger and harder to handle. A similar scope would be: http://www.celestron.com/prod_pgs/tel/c10ngt.htm I've been seeing fewer and fewer of these for some reason. Most people will cut the price down even farther and go with a Dob instead of this setup. The only difference between this scope and a Dob is the mounting. The advantage here is that you can dabble with your astrophotography. I hope this helps. Clear, Dark Skies Mark |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Telescope - On to Mounts | Edward Smith | Amateur Astronomy | 42 | January 31st 04 11:05 PM |
NASA Releases Dazzling Images From New Space Telescope | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | December 18th 03 07:02 PM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Misc | 12 | November 5th 03 09:27 PM |
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Awards $17.5 Million For Thirty-Meter Telescope Plans | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 18th 03 01:08 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |