![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I understand it, the Educator Astronaut is
-1- A mission specialist with specific skills in K-12 education -2- Required to fulfill same duties as traditional MS (e.g. EVA, remote manipulator arm operator, payload specialist, ISS construction, etc.) The purpose of the Educator Astronaut is to "help lead the Agency in the development of new ways to connect space exploration with the classroom, and to inspire the next generation of explorers." According to http://edspace.nasa.gov/faq/faq.html , they will "experience something unique that they can use to engage students and to inspire them to consider a career in science, technology, engineering and mathematics." Currently, 3-6 educator astronaut candidates will be selected to be among the next Astronaut Candidate group. Indeed, NASA lists Educational Excellence as one of its contributions to National Priorities within its Strategic Roadmap. In this self-proclaimed role, some specific actions NASA is taking (under various categories) include -Produce teaching tools (cat: Educational Technology) -Coordinate and articulate student programs (cat: Student Support) -Provide professional development in standards-led education (cat: Support of Systemic Improvement) See "The Role of Education in NASA's Strategic Plan" at http://education.nasa.gov/implan/role.html for additional information. I see pros and cons to this program. PROS: -NASA offers a unique perspective to inspire children because it gives a glimpse of the future that can be attained via math, science and engineering. -NASA astronauts are positive role models and outstanding spokespersons for the sciences. -As Barbara Morgan said in a 2000 interview with NEA, NASA is showing that teachers are as important as geologists, engineers, physicians and scientists to the space program. CONS: -NASA's foray into the education arena may be viewed as a Public Relations campaign to inspire support for NASA more than for education. -There are other agencies tasked with promoting K-12 education (e.g. NSF) in math and science. NASA should concentrate its resources on its primary missions. -NASA can do more to inspire children and adults with successful missions and driving towards a National goal (e.g. Hubble Space Telescope, Mars Pathfinder). -Why teachers and not politicians, journalists or artists? Additional PROS/CONS and your comments welcome. Thanks for reading. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Relevancy of the Educator Astronaut to the Space Program | stmx3 | Space Shuttle | 2 | October 9th 03 06:24 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |
The Life and Death of Russia's Space Shuttle Program , from Pravda | Locz | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 4th 03 02:49 PM |
COST REDUCTION POTENTIAL IN SPACE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | Craig Fink | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 21st 03 11:17 PM |