![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article at:
"http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030825sts114/" about planning for next shuttle flight, the following appears. "(A) tile repair kit will be located at the back of the shuttle's cargo bay and feature a panel of deliberately damaged heat shield tiles. The spacewalkers will attempt to repair the tiles using materials and procedures currently in the development stage. "The work does not yet include any sort of repair demonstration for reinforced carbon carbon panels making up the orbiter's wing leading edges. While promising procedures are under study, it's not yet clear whether any repair techniques can be developed in time for a flight next spring." How can NASA justify flying a space shuttle mission before an RCC repair is available? Didn't CAIB just prove that damaged RCC caused the Colombia failure? - Ed Kyle |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ed kyle wrote:
In article at: "http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030825sts114/" about planning for next shuttle flight, the following appears. "(A) tile repair kit will be located at the back of the shuttle's cargo bay and feature a panel of deliberately damaged heat shield tiles. The spacewalkers will attempt to repair the tiles using materials and procedures currently in the development stage. "The work does not yet include any sort of repair demonstration for reinforced carbon carbon panels making up the orbiter's wing leading edges. While promising procedures are under study, it's not yet clear whether any repair techniques can be developed in time for a flight next spring." How can NASA justify flying a space shuttle mission before an RCC repair is available? Didn't CAIB just prove that damaged RCC caused the Colombia failure? It is available. Unless NASA management decides to repair the tiles in the cargo bay, instead of damaged tiles on the bottom of the Orbiter. Craig Fink |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Damaged by debris from the ET. It seems to me, solving the debris problem will go along way toward making RCC repair unnecessary. Brian Nasa already stated foam will never be 100% |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ed kyle" wrote in message om... | In article at: | | "http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030825sts114/" | | about planning for next shuttle flight, the following appears. | | "(A) tile repair kit will be located at the back of the shuttle's | cargo bay and feature a panel of deliberately damaged heat shield | tiles. The spacewalkers will attempt to repair the tiles using | materials and procedures currently in the development stage. | | "The work does not yet include any sort of repair demonstration | for reinforced carbon carbon panels making up the orbiter's wing | leading edges. While promising procedures are under study, it's | not yet clear whether any repair techniques can be developed in | time for a flight next spring." | | How can NASA justify flying a space shuttle mission before an | RCC repair is available? Didn't CAIB just prove that damaged | RCC caused the Colombia failure? | | - Ed Kyle Next Shuttle goes to ISS, Inspection envisaged on orbit, though nobody seems to be saying what they might do if the rcc is found to be damaged, and they have all those folk on orbit with limited resources and consumables. Brian -- Brian Gaff.... graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________ __________________________________ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/03 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ed kyle" wrote in message om... In article at: "http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030825sts114/" about planning for next shuttle flight, the following appears. "(A) tile repair kit will be located at the back of the shuttle's cargo bay and feature a panel of deliberately damaged heat shield tiles. The spacewalkers will attempt to repair the tiles using materials and procedures currently in the development stage. "The work does not yet include any sort of repair demonstration for reinforced carbon carbon panels making up the orbiter's wing leading edges. While promising procedures are under study, it's not yet clear whether any repair techniques can be developed in time for a flight next spring." How can NASA justify flying a space shuttle mission before an RCC repair is available? Didn't CAIB just prove that damaged RCC caused the Colombia failure? Well, if you can explain to the rest of us how you fly a tested, proved to work repair kit w/o first testing it and proving it, I'm sure we're all ears. - Ed Kyle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should program manager be out of town during shuttle flight | Hallerb | Space Shuttle | 51 | July 29th 03 04:27 PM |
NASA Team Believed Foam Could Not Damage Space Shuttle | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 9 | July 25th 03 08:33 AM |
Two ideas Shuttle return to flight -- Do they hold up? | Christopher P. Winter | Space Shuttle | 12 | July 16th 03 06:26 PM |
NYT: NASA Management Failings Are Linked to Shuttle Demise | Recom | Space Shuttle | 11 | July 14th 03 05:45 PM |
Shuttle Flight Data | Hawkeye | Space Shuttle | 2 | July 11th 03 03:37 AM |