![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted on Tue, Sep. 28, 2004
It's the market system that will develop space travel imho. Airline mogul plans to offer commercial space flights by '07 http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...9776962.htm?1c Richard Branson's Virgin Group signed a deal to build the world's first private spaceship to go into commercial operating service. The craft will be based on Burt Raton's design for SpaceShipOne. BY JILL LAWLESS Associated Press LONDON - Airline mogul and adventurer Richard Branson announced plans Monday to boldly go where no private transport company has gone before -- into space. Branson's Virgin Group said it would offer commercial space flights by 2007, with Branson himself joining the inaugural journey. The bid is a natural for Branson, a high school dropout turned flamboyant tycoon who has made several failed attempts to circle the world by hot-air balloon. ''It's just the kind of thing he absolutely loves, because it gets him maximum publicity,'' said David Learmount, operations and safety editor of Flight International magazine. ''But the technology is there; it's plausible,'' Learmount said. Branson, 54, announced a deal to license technology from Mojave Aerospace Ventures, the firm owned by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen that bankrolled June's historic 90-minute space flight by the aircraft SpaceShipOne. The Virgin craft will be based on Burt Rutan's design for SpaceShipOne, a stubby rocket-plane capable of carrying a pilot and two passengers. ''Virgin has been in talks with Paul Allen and Burt throughout this year and in the early hours of Saturday, signed a historical deal to license SpaceShipOne's technology to build the world's first private spaceship to go into commercial operating service,'' Branson told a news conference in London. SpaceShipOne cracked the barrier to manned commercial space flight in June by taking a 90-minute flight almost 62 miles above Earth, just over the distance scientists widely consider to be the boundary of space. Virgin said it planned to begin construction of the first vessel, VSS Enterprise, next year and to offer flights by 2007. The new service will be called Virgin Galactic and expects to fly 3,000 new astronauts in its first five years. Fares will start at $208,000 for a two- to three-hour suborbital flight, including three days' training. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Curious-yellow" wrote in message ... The new service will be called Virgin Galactic and expects to fly 3,000 new astronauts in its first five years. Fares will start at $208,000 for a two- to three-hour suborbital flight, including three days' training. Is that price really so bad? It is, after all, a full two orders of magnitude cheaper than the going price for an orbital flight. Based on the survey results, I think they've reached a price point where the very rich will find this an affordable price for "the ultimate thrill ride". Jeff -- Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley wrote:
"Curious-yellow" wrote in message ... The new service will be called Virgin Galactic and expects to fly 3,000 new astronauts in its first five years. Fares will start at $208,000 for a two- to three-hour suborbital flight, including three days' training. Is that price really so bad? It is, after all, a full two orders of magnitude cheaper than the going price for an orbital flight. Based on the survey results, I think they've reached a price point where the very rich will find this an affordable price for "the ultimate thrill ride". Though about an order of magnitude more expensive per second. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Stirling" wrote in message ... In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley wrote: Is that price really so bad? It is, after all, a full two orders of magnitude cheaper than the going price for an orbital flight. Based on the survey results, I think they've reached a price point where the very rich will find this an affordable price for "the ultimate thrill ride". Though about an order of magnitude more expensive per second. You get that at theme parks today. There's a ride at PKI that costs maybe $20 per person (on top of general admission) and lasts maybe a minute. All this ride does is slingshot you into the air and bounce you around a bit (you're riding in a spherical cage, strapped into a seat). People still pay. People will sometimes pay quite a bit of money for a short thrill. Skydiving is another example of a "hobby" that isn't cheap and the "ride" is short. Clearly, suborbital flights will be limited to the very wealthy, but what's $200k on a single "vacation" to a person who makes over $1 million a year? Jeff -- Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Curious-yellow" wrote in message ...
Posted on Tue, Sep. 28, 2004 It's the market system that will develop space travel imho. If I were filthy rich, I would take advantage of this in a heartbeat. Airline mogul plans to offer commercial space flights by '07 http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...9776962.htm?1c Richard Branson's Virgin Group signed a deal to build the world's first private spaceship to go into commercial operating service. The craft will be based on Burt Raton's design for SpaceShipOne. BY JILL LAWLESS Associated Press LONDON - Airline mogul and adventurer Richard Branson announced plans Monday to boldly go where no private transport company has gone before -- into space. Branson's Virgin Group said it would offer commercial space flights by 2007, with Branson himself joining the inaugural journey. The bid is a natural for Branson, a high school dropout turned flamboyant tycoon who has made several failed attempts to circle the world by hot-air balloon. ''It's just the kind of thing he absolutely loves, because it gets him maximum publicity,'' said David Learmount, operations and safety editor of Flight International magazine. ''But the technology is there; it's plausible,'' Learmount said. Branson, 54, announced a deal to license technology from Mojave Aerospace Ventures, the firm owned by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen that bankrolled June's historic 90-minute space flight by the aircraft SpaceShipOne. The Virgin craft will be based on Burt Rutan's design for SpaceShipOne, a stubby rocket-plane capable of carrying a pilot and two passengers. ''Virgin has been in talks with Paul Allen and Burt throughout this year and in the early hours of Saturday, signed a historical deal to license SpaceShipOne's technology to build the world's first private spaceship to go into commercial operating service,'' Branson told a news conference in London. SpaceShipOne cracked the barrier to manned commercial space flight in June by taking a 90-minute flight almost 62 miles above Earth, just over the distance scientists widely consider to be the boundary of space. Virgin said it planned to begin construction of the first vessel, VSS Enterprise, next year and to offer flights by 2007. The new service will be called Virgin Galactic and expects to fly 3,000 new astronauts in its first five years. Fares will start at $208,000 for a two- to three-hour suborbital flight, including three days' training. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chuck Lysaght wrote: "Curious-yellow" wrote in message ... Posted on Tue, Sep. 28, 2004 It's the market system that will develop space travel imho. If I were filthy rich, I would take advantage of this in a heartbeat. You're halfway there. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Curious-yellow" wrote in message ...
Virgin said it planned to begin construction of the first vessel, VSS Enterprise, next year and to offer flights by 2007. The new service will be called Virgin Galactic and expects to fly 3,000 new astronauts in its first five years. Fares will start at $208,000 for a two- to three-hour suborbital flight, including three days' training. Assuming Branson is serious, what is required? Assuming a design similar to SpaceshipOne, we have 2 passengers/flight. With 3,000 passengers over 5 years, we need 300 flights/year. If turnaround time remains 2 weeks per ship, we need at least 6 ships in the fleet. I think Paul Allen spent about $20 million developing SpaceshipOne (anyone know what each engine costs?) so assume it will cost about $10 million to build each new ship, with operating costs unknown, but let's say $100,000/flight. Shall we build an extra plane to carry the ships? Say another $10 million. So Branson would spend about $70 million to build the ships and jet, another $150 million in operating costs over the 5 years or 1,500 flights, and gross $624 million over the 5 years. He'd net about $400 million or $80 million/year. Not bad. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Bogen" wrote in message om... "Curious-yellow" wrote in message ... Virgin said it planned to begin construction of the first vessel, VSS Enterprise, next year and to offer flights by 2007. The new service will be called Virgin Galactic and expects to fly 3,000 new astronauts in its first five years. Fares will start at $208,000 for a two- to three-hour suborbital flight, including three days' training. Assuming Branson is serious, what is required? Assuming a design similar to SpaceshipOne, we have 2 passengers/flight. The news article on CNN says, "passengers in groups of five", so if this is right, you'd need less Spaceship Two's than Spaceship One's. However, CNN also screwed up and said "into orbit" instead of "into space". Later in the article, their description of the flight is clearly suborbital, with the description, "there would be just four to five minutes of weightlessness". You clearly get more time weightless than that if you orbit the earth even once! Jeff -- Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Bill
Bogen wrote: He'd net about $400 million or $80 million/year. Not bad. Few people have called Branson a fool. A twit, a fashion victim, and a dribbling idiot, but when it comes to money, he's not a fool. -- Aidan Karley, Aberdeen, Scotland, Location: 57°10'11" N, 02°08'43" W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Stirling wrote:
In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley wrote: "Curious-yellow" wrote in message ... The new service will be called Virgin Galactic and expects to fly 3,000 new astronauts in its first five years. Fares will start at $208,000 for a two- to three-hour suborbital flight, including three days' training. Is that price really so bad? It is, after all, a full two orders of magnitude cheaper than the going price for an orbital flight. Based on the survey results, I think they've reached a price point where the very rich will find this an affordable price for "the ultimate thrill ride". Though about an order of magnitude more expensive per second. NASCAR is another order of magnitude still, but they give you a bottle of champagne. -- -------(m+ ~/ ![]() The most essential gift for a good writer is a built-in, shock-proof, **** detector. -- Hemingway http://scrawlmark.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Report on China's Space Program | Steve Dufour | Misc | 20 | October 25th 03 06:43 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |