![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alan Erskine" wrote in message ...
"Simon Templar" wrote in message m.au... OK, I'm getting ****ED OFF with everybody continuing with this thread without deleting non-relevant Newsgroups. You've done it again! Ah, but I've undone it. Play nice gentlemen. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Combs" wrote in message ...
"warrenb" wrote in message ... It makes more sense/cheaper to live on the bottom of the ocean, or build a biosphere in the desert This proceeds from an incorrect assumption: that the problem is we're getting too crowded and we need to develop another place not currently filled with humans in order to hold the spillover. That's not true at all. The practical reason is that we are running short of critical mateirals - as pointed out in the URLs I provided earlier. We don't have enough energy on Earth we don't have enough strategic materials on Earth to meet the needs of an industrial humanity. THe solar system has these in abundance. We can collect solar energy and use it to make synthetic oil or oil replacements if done cheaply enough. We can capture rich asteroids and bring them back to Earth to provide critical raw materials. This is the practical reason to support space travel in the present age. That's not the reason why we want to develop space. We want to develop space because we want to have a destiny that lies beyond this one tiny little corner of the universe. That's not practical enough. While it is true humanity has always developed its frontiers when the resources of the center have failed - while it is true that Earth is the center and the solar system the frontier in the present age - we still need a practical focus for our activities. And here it is. We obtain solar energy efficiently from the sun while in space. We obtain critical materials from asteroids moved to Earth orbit with space faring technologies like nuclear pulse rockets. There is also a spiritual dividend to space exploration. Fully 1/3 of all lunar astronauts had a life-changing spiritual experience from their trip. The environmental movement can be shown to be a result of Apollo 8s picture of Earth taken from the moon - floating alone and vulnerable in space, without international borders. This suggests that for astronauts who travel far from Earth (not the high-altitude flight of the Shuttle or SS1) a significant portion of them will gain deep insights that will illuminate future spiritual and political experience. This sort of experience and growth is uniformly feard by police states - but this sort of thing is essential to the continued Ascent of Man! (Okay I admit, I've recently watched Jacob Bronowski again on the Science Channel! ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Misc | 4 | April 15th 04 04:45 AM |
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 | Nathan Jones | Misc | 20 | November 11th 03 07:33 PM |