![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shuttle Foam Test Yields Hole in Wing
Columbia Investigators Fire Foam Insulation at Shuttle Wing, Blowing Open 2-Foot Hole The Associated Press SAN ANTONIO July 7 — The team investigating the Columbia disaster fired a chunk of foam insulation at shuttle wing parts Monday and blew open a gaping 2-foot hole, offering dramatic evidence to support the theory of what doomed the spaceship. The crowd of about 100 gasped and cried, "Wow!" when the foam hit. The foam struck roughly the same spot where insulation that broke off Columbia's big external fuel tank during launch smashed into the shuttle's wing. Investigators believe the damage led to the ship's destruction during re-entry over Texas in February, killing all seven astronauts. It was the seventh and final foam-impact test by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, and it yielded by far the most severe damage. The 1.67-pound piece of fuel tank foam insulation shot out of a 35-foot nitrogen-pressurized gun and slammed into a carbon-reinforced panel removed from shuttle Atlantis. The countdown boomed through loudspeakers, and the crack of the foam coming out at more than 500 mph reverberated in the field where the test was conducted. Twelve high-speed cameras six inside the wing mock-up and six outside captured the event. Hundreds of sensors registered movements, stresses and other conditions. NASA will continue gathering more information about the poorly understood pieces that line the vulnerable leading edges of shuttle wings, board member Scott Hubbard said. One month ago, another carbon shuttle wing panel smaller and farther inboard was cracked by the impact, in addition to an adjoining seal. This time, the entire 11 1/2-inch width of the foam chunk rather than just a corner during previous tests hit the wing, putting maximum stress on the suspect area. http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20030707_1189.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rusty B wrote:
Shuttle Foam Test Yields Hole in Wing Columbia Investigators Fire Foam Insulation at Shuttle Wing, Blowing Open 2-Foot Hole The Associated Press SAN ANTONIO July 7 — The team investigating the Columbia disaster fired a chunk of foam insulation at shuttle wing parts Monday and blew open a gaping 2-foot hole, offering dramatic evidence to support the theory of what doomed the spaceship. The crowd of about 100 gasped and cried, "Wow!" when the foam hit. In the immortal words of Rosanne Rosanna Dana, Well now, that's different. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 22:21:00 +0200, Kegwasher wrote:
In the immortal words of Rosanne Rosanna Dana, Well now, that's different. I think that was Emily Litella ![]() Dale |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The 1.67-pound piece of fuel tank foam insulation shot out of a 35-foot nitrogen-pressurized gun and slammed into a carbon-reinforced panel removed from shuttle Atlantis. /me gets an image flash of all remaining shuttles being blown to pieces by the CAIB investigators... "look, if you punch it here, it breaks too!" I didn't realize they were stripping the existing fleet to perform these tests. Couldn't they take spare parts for this, or produce test samples? Steven |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Steven Van Impe" wrote: I didn't realize they were stripping the existing fleet to perform these tests. Couldn't they take spare parts for this, or produce test samples? One of the purposes of the impact tests is to characterize damage caused to flight-aged RCC segments. A serious issue (one that hasn't been studied much if at all) is how RCC ages - how do its mechanical properties change with time and exposure to flight conditions, for example? Testing flight components of similar age to those on Columbia will allow the CAIB the greatest confidence available in reaching its conclusions. Testing newly-made test articles and/or stored spares would be valuable in quantifying age as a factor in Columbia's destruction - for instance, if new-made RCC segments don't fracture under test conditions like the test articles have, then it becomes a priority for NASA to institute some RCC manufaturing capability and make up some new flight sets. On the other hand, such tests aren't truly necessary for the CAIB's purpose, which is to determine the most likely cause or set of contributing factors to the loss of Columbia and her crew. -- Herb Schaltegger, Esq. Chief Counsel, Human O-Ring Society "I was promised flying cars! Where are the flying cars?!" ~ Avery Brooks |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 22:21:00 +0200, Kegwasher
wrote: SAN ANTONIO July 7 — The team investigating the Columbia disaster fired a chunk of foam insulation at shuttle wing parts Monday and blew open a gaping 2-foot hole, offering dramatic evidence to support the theory of what doomed the spaceship. The crowd of about 100 gasped and cried, "Wow!" when the foam hit. Well now, that's different. Or, "let's keep firing bigger pieces of foam at the wing until we get results that match our theory..." Nevermind that the foam chunks are now much larger and travelling much faster than the computer models predict for STS-107. I don't want to start sounding like JTM, but there seems to be something a little weird about these tests. Brian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Thorn wrote:
Nevermind that the foam chunks are now much larger and travelling much faster than the computer models predict for STS-107. I don't want to start sounding like JTM, but there seems to be something a little weird about these tests. The foam is the same mass as used on earlier tests, I believe. The impact energy also is a function of how fast the foam was spinning, and the damage is a function of whether the foam hits flat side on or edge on (the latter delivers the impulse over a longer period, for a lower maximum force.) BTW, I hope those persons who were arguing against improved photography will now have the grace to reconsider their positions. Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't realize they were stripping the existing fleet to perform these
tests. Couldn't they take spare parts for this, or produce test samples? Steven The want to use flight flown parts. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rusty B" wrote in message
om... Shuttle Foam Test Yields Hole in Wing Columbia Investigators Fire Foam Insulation at Shuttle Wing, Blowing Open 2-Foot Hole The Associated Press SAN ANTONIO July 7 - The team investigating the Columbia disaster fired a chunk of foam insulation at shuttle wing parts Monday and blew open a gaping 2-foot hole, offering dramatic evidence to support the theory of what doomed the spaceship. The crowd of about 100 gasped and cried, "Wow!" when the foam hit. The foam struck roughly the same spot where insulation that broke off Columbia's big external fuel tank during launch smashed into the shuttle's wing. Investigators believe the damage led to the ship's destruction during re-entry over Texas in February, killing all seven astronauts. It was the seventh and final foam-impact test by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, and it yielded by far the most severe damage. The 1.67-pound piece of fuel tank foam insulation shot out of a 35-foot nitrogen-pressurized gun and slammed into a carbon-reinforced panel removed from shuttle Atlantis. The countdown boomed through loudspeakers, and the crack of the foam coming out at more than 500 mph reverberated in the field where the 500 MPH!!!!! How did anyone come up with that figure? Seems excessive to me. test was conducted. Twelve high-speed cameras six inside the wing mock-up and six outside captured the event. Hundreds of sensors registered movements, stresses and other conditions. NASA will continue gathering more information about the poorly understood pieces that line the vulnerable leading edges of shuttle wings, board member Scott Hubbard said. One month ago, another carbon shuttle wing panel smaller and farther inboard was cracked by the impact, in addition to an adjoining seal. This time, the entire 11 1/2-inch width of the foam chunk rather than just a corner during previous tests hit the wing, putting maximum stress on the suspect area. http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20030707_1189.html jbw |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 22:21:00 +0200, Kegwasher
wrote: In the immortal words of Rosanne Rosanna Dana, Well now, that's different. ....Emily Litella, actually. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Japanese Test Space Shuttle Crashes in Sweden | Rusty B | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 2nd 03 03:58 PM |