![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I was showing a friend a picture I've taken of Uranus this w-e. he was well impressed and said "I wonder what the sun looks like seen from there". I've been trying to find either real pictures (from voyager?) or artist creation of what it looks like without success. The only source I have is my Starry Night program, where you can set the observing point to uranus, but I don't know if it's supposed to be a realistic image. Anyone can point me to the right website? Many thanks Philippe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:10:10 +0100, Philippe Gautier
wrote: Hello, I was showing a friend a picture I've taken of Uranus this w-e. he was well impressed and said "I wonder what the sun looks like seen from there". I've been trying to find either real pictures (from voyager?) or artist creation of what it looks like without success. The only source I have is my Starry Night program, where you can set the observing point to uranus, but I don't know if it's supposed to be a realistic image. Anyone can point me to the right website? Starry Night gives a pretty good approximation as to what somethings look like from other places in the Solar System / Galaxy. In the case of Uranus, it's depiction fails a bit in respect of the magnitude of the scene. According to it's info window, the Sun would be 1 arcmin across (that's approximately 1/30th the apparent diameter of the Sun as seen from Earth) and magnitude -21.48. That's a bright dot in the sky! If these figures are not correct - read it to the software, not me! Just before Venus went into transit last June, it's apparent angular diameter was approaching 1 arcmin but it was too close to the Sun to see it in dark skies. At the end of April 2004 it's apparent diameter was about 0.5 arcmin. At this time it's magnitude was about -4.5 at maximum brightness. -21.48 is 17 magnitudes brighter or 2.5^17 times brighter than Venus at it's brightest (that's about 6 million times brighter if my Monday morning maths is working - unlikely ;-) ). If the above is correct, you can tell your friend to remember what brilliant Venus looked like in the evening sky (or indeed to get up and see it for real in the current morning sky) and imagine what it would look like 6 million times brighter but twice the size (or 4x the current morning size of 15 arcsecs apparent diameter). -- Pete Lawrence http://www.digitalsky.org.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:10:10 +0100, Philippe Gautier wrote: Hello, I was showing a friend a picture I've taken of Uranus this w-e. he was well impressed and said "I wonder what the sun looks like seen from there". I've been trying to find either real pictures (from voyager?) or artist creation of what it looks like without success. The only source I have is my Starry Night program, where you can set the observing point to uranus, but I don't know if it's supposed to be a realistic image. Anyone can point me to the right website? Starry Night gives a pretty good approximation as to what somethings look like from other places in the Solar System / Galaxy. In the case of Uranus, it's depiction fails a bit in respect of the magnitude of the scene. According to it's info window, the Sun would be 1 arcmin across (that's approximately 1/30th the apparent diameter of the Sun as seen from Earth) and magnitude -21.48. That's a bright dot in the sky! If these figures are not correct - read it to the software, not me! Just before Venus went into transit last June, it's apparent angular diameter was approaching 1 arcmin but it was too close to the Sun to see it in dark skies. At the end of April 2004 it's apparent diameter was about 0.5 arcmin. At this time it's magnitude was about -4.5 at maximum brightness. -21.48 is 17 magnitudes brighter or 2.5^17 times brighter than Venus at it's brightest (that's about 6 million times brighter if my Monday morning maths is working - unlikely ;-) ). If the above is correct, you can tell your friend to remember what brilliant Venus looked like in the evening sky (or indeed to get up and see it for real in the current morning sky) and imagine what it would look like 6 million times brighter but twice the size (or 4x the current morning size of 15 arcsecs apparent diameter). Waouw, thanks for all the info, Pete! Philippe |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Lawrence wrote:
Starry Night gives a pretty good approximation as to what somethings look like from other places in the Solar System / Galaxy. In the case of Uranus, it's depiction fails a bit in respect of the magnitude of the scene. According to it's info window, the Sun would be 1 arcmin across (that's approximately 1/30th the apparent diameter of the Sun as seen from Earth) and magnitude -21.48. That's a bright dot in the sky! If these figures are not correct - read it to the software, not me! Starry Night may not be so wrong - my version gives Sun's magnitude as -20.38 from Uranus and -26.90 from Earth - that's a difference of 6.5 magnitudes 19 au further away from the Sun than Earth. It should be 19 squared times dimmer = 361. 6.5 magnitudes =100*2.51*(something or other for the half and I bet it's not far off 1.43) making a difference of 361. Anyway I've got a pair of eclipse glasses for your trip to Uranus. It seems odd - but high noon on Uranus is still going to be pretty dark. -- Martin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Frey wrote:
It seems odd - but high noon on Uranus is still going to be pretty dark. I'm sure I'm going to made to regret posting that. -- Martin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:38:52 +0100, Martin Frey
wrote: Pete Lawrence wrote: It seems odd - but high noon on Uranus is still going to be pretty dark. Often the way in the valleys ;-) -- Pete Lawrence http://www.digitalsky.org.uk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Martin Frey
writes Martin Frey wrote: It seems odd - but high noon on Uranus is still going to be pretty dark. I'm sure I'm going to made to regret posting that. I'll get in first with a remark about it being dark where the sun doesn't shine, but go on to say that the Voyager team had to do some clever programming to get the amazing pictures they did. Sadly, the encounter was overshadowed by events closer to home. -- What have they got to hide? Release the ESA Beagle 2 report. Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:38:52 +0100, Martin Frey wrote: It seems odd - but high noon on Uranus is still going to be pretty dark. Often the way in the valleys ;-) And there was I, on the point of congratulating you on the piccy on extended Sky at Night - well I won't now, so there. Enjoyed the prog - the extra 10 mins well worthwhile. -- Martin |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:05:06 +0100, Martin Frey
wrote: Pete Lawrence wrote: On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:38:52 +0100, Martin Frey wrote: It seems odd - but high noon on Uranus is still going to be pretty dark. Often the way in the valleys ;-) And there was I, on the point of congratulating you on the piccy on extended Sky at Night - well I won't now, so there. Enjoyed the prog - the extra 10 mins well worthwhile. I was just in the process of writing to Anthony Ayiomamitis to ask him for permission to use a couple of his images in a local presentation to Selsey Camera Club when I looked at the telly and saw a familiar M15, then a familiar M33 then Anthony's lunar eclipse montage! Almost ranks along the same weirdness of my office cleanout last week. I had just thrown out some files relating to a project that ended for me 6 years ago when a phone call occurred. Yep, it was the same client! Synchronicity in action! -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Philippe Gautier wrote: Hello, I was showing a friend a picture I've taken of Uranus this w-e. he was well impressed and said "I wonder what the sun looks like seen from there". I've been trying to find either real pictures (from voyager?) or artist creation of what it looks like without success. The only source I have is my Starry Night program, where you can set the observing point to uranus, but I don't know if it's supposed to be a realistic image. Anyone can point me to the right website? Many thanks Philippe I quite like the Celestia software, not only can you move freely through the solar system, you can move to other stars, and even out of the galaxy. Not sure how accurate it is (although if you get the NASA data, I'm guessing it's pretty good), but either way, it's fun, and free. Larry |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First detection of CO in Uranus (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | December 17th 03 03:07 AM |
Hubble Uncovers Smallest Moons Yet Seen Around Uranus | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | September 25th 03 05:34 PM |