A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is Everything Relative???



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st 04, 01:16 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is Everything Relative???

Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative?
How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to
our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the
motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they
get? Tricky stuff Bert

  #2  
Old August 31st 04, 03:48 PM
Benign Vanilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative?
How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to
our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the
motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they
get? Tricky stuff Bert


Bert, I have no idea how to answer your question, but I love the new thread
for the topic. Thank you.

BV.


  #3  
Old August 31st 04, 06:32 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi BV You are welcome Had this thought for a few weeks. Little afraid of
posting it. Still God hates a coward Don't really know the answers,but
seems to me it is worth some good thinking. Bert.

  #4  
Old August 31st 04, 11:39 PM
md
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
...

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative?
How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to
our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the
motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they
get? Tricky stuff Bert


Bert, I have no idea how to answer your question, but I love the new thread
for the topic. Thank you.

BV.


thank you bert, an excellent post indeed, please continue, in another group....


  #5  
Old September 1st 04, 12:05 AM
Lise Eleanor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'll bite:

q. 1 yes
q. 2 depends
q. 3 Is this a woodchuck question?

:-)

Actually, I just came to answer your post to tell you something:

Thank you.

I've been crunching an ancient Egyptian math formula for 3 years, trying to
crack it. I saw your nickname and BAM!

Yep. The answer is 256.
--
From the Desk of Lise Eleanor
http://www3.sympatico.ca/l_e/
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative?
How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to
our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the
motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they
get? Tricky stuff Bert



  #6  
Old September 1st 04, 01:39 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Benign Vanilla wrote:

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative?
How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to
our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the
motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they
get? Tricky stuff Bert


Bert, I have no idea how to answer your question, but I love the new thread
for the topic. Thank you.

BV.


nightbat

Yes Bert, per energy. Group organized potential flow or static
electricity is a basic component of energy intrinsic disturbed or
organized unit and always is in perpetual motion. Only relative from
composite mutual nature, energy, and whose varied multi motion is
permitted in a disturbed field state. They are all relative from an
energy base frame. And yes, may be very tricky to the uninitiated
questioning observer.


the nightbat

  #7  
Old September 1st 04, 02:00 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi BV You are welcome Had this thought for a few weeks. Little afraid of
posting it. Still God hates a coward Don't really know the answers,but
seems to me it is worth some good thinking. Bert.


nightbat

It was a very good thought Bert, you should be glad you had the
guts to post it. Never be afraid to post your imaginative science
thoughts. Try however, to keep your sexual thoughts or inclinations
about potential space beauties more directed internally and or most
importantly towards your wife. Cuts down on any possible needless stress
levels and makes those interesting what if thoughts apparently flow
better. Don't get me wrong, most of us would love a nice pic of cosmic
enchanting mysterious Darla in reported bisexual birthday suit, just for
science sake of course. (:~)


the nightbat

  #8  
Old September 1st 04, 07:46 AM
BP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Get out the old Griffiths book "Intro to Electrodynamics." That will help
you in relativistic questions.

BP
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative?
How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to
our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the
motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they
get? Tricky stuff Bert



  #9  
Old September 1st 04, 09:19 AM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi nightbat You just did what you told me not to do.Ha Ha ha bisexual
Darla in a birthday suit(oh ya) Bert

  #10  
Old September 1st 04, 12:38 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well QM and GR are not relative. Einstein figured that out right away.
How about Max Born's "probability waves" in QM. Do we have probability
ocean waves?(I think not),and yet. Max told us that an electron
wave must be interpreted by viewing it from a standpoint of
"probability" It might be here there,but don'"t try to pin point it.
Here in our GR world we don't have anything relative to that. We can pin
point stuff easily. How can we predict experimental outcomes in QM if
there is a probability that "any" given outcome may occur? I wonder if
Einstein and Max stayed friends after Max came up with probability. I
can't see Heisenberg,and Einstein being very close. Their thinking was
not relative. Bert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Relative Distance & Mass of the Sun and Earth JeffP Solar 2 January 11th 04 02:15 PM
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 8 August 31st 03 02:53 AM
Relative Motion G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 0 July 19th 03 02:40 PM
Sun's position relative to the planets? Matthew F Funke Science 5 July 15th 03 02:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.