A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Good science and evidence? Lot of crap!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd 04, 01:15 PM
Ed Conrad
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Good science and evidence? Lot of crap!



On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!
An insult to science is really what it is.
Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.

Don't you ever wonder, Gregg, how the decent, honest
conscientious scientists in other fields must feel about
this mockery of scientific integrity that has long been perpetratred
by this cast of vested-interest boo-birds.

Every time they face true facts and are confronted with physical
evidence, they boo -- then tell one of their 1,000,000 bagfuls of lies

=========================================

===========================================

MAN AS OLD AS COAL
Petrified Bones, Teeth and Soft Organs
(Some Human) Found Between Coal Veins

===========================================

OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/krogwskull.jpg

Wilton Krogman, one of the world's foremost experts
on human anatomy, holds what he had identified as
a petrified human calvarium, a skull with the eye
sockets broken off, that was discovered between
Pennsylvania's anthracite veins. He is shown at his
desk at the Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., where
moments later he beckoned a colleague -- a medical
doctor -- to examine "the oldest human skull ever
found."

A CATscan was performed on this specimen with
favorable results.

http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg


Meanwhile, Haversian canals were identified in the
cell structue, the tell-tale sign of bone. And dried
blood was found on the specimen during testing at
American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.

This is the official report from AML which had
erformed Calculus Analysis by Crystallography.
The final report, dated April 21, 2000, was issued
by Dr. Nathan Sherman, director of laboratories.

"The specimen consists of 1 irregularly
shaped, brown calculus weighing less
than 0.0010 grams and measuring 1X1X0.5
mm. No nidus is observed. The calculi
indicates a composition of dried blood
intermingled with a few small crystals
resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."

http://www.edconrad.com/images/z12calv.jpg

http://www.edconrad.com/images/z13cav.jpg
=============================================

OTHER PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH AND
SOFT ORGANS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS
Here'sa petrified human femur still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg


Here's a petrified human finger, with fingernail:
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG


Here's a petrified human toe (with toe nail), found only
10-15 feet from the petrified finger.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG


Here are the petrified human finger and the petrified
human toe shown together.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG


Here's the specimen that Krogman identified as a tibia
It contains Haversian canals, proof of bone, and dried
blood was found on it during testing at American Medical
Laboratories. This is the specimen that was fraudulently
tested by Andrew MacRae who produced microscopic photos
of the cell structure of a rock on the false pretext
that he was showing the cell structure of this specimen.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg


This is the boulder containing the complete human skull.
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg


Here's a petrified human mandible (frontal).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG


Here's a portion of a human mandible (side).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG


Here's a giant petrified tooth.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg


Here's a petrified dinosaur foot still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg


Here's a petrified fetus of some large animal.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG


Here's another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG


Here are several views of portion of a giant prehistoric
scorpion identified as such by Krogman.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG


Here's a photo of the same portion of a petrified giant
scorpion -- found 22 years ago -- alongside one found
weeks ago.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG


Here are two views of a piece of wood that appears to have
been handcarved for use as a tool or a weapon.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG

================================================== ===

LATEST DISCOVERIES: NEW Petrified Human Finger, Thumb

http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/O11/MVC-038S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/O11/MVC-037S.JPG




  #2  
Old August 22nd 04, 04:17 PM
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dear Ed Conrad:

"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
news


On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!
An insult to science is really what it is.
Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.


The appendix.
The commonality in the chromosomes between man, chimpanzee, even yeast.
The skeletal record dating back hundreds of thousands of years (your
evolutionary link).
Changes in genome to provide immunity to malaria, and cycstic fibrosis (and
many others).

We are a work in progress. If we are made in his image, his image seems to
include "successive approximation". Assuming you don't like the word
"evolution", try those two.

David A. Smith


  #3  
Old August 22nd 04, 05:30 PM
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Let me try this again...

Dear Ed Conrad:

"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
news


On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!
An insult to science is really what it is.
Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.


The appendix.
The commonality in the chromosomes between man, chimpanzee, even yeast.
The skeletal record dating back hundreds of thousands of years (your
evolutionary link).
Changes in genome to provide immunity to malaria, and cholera (and
many others).

[Note: the word "cholera" was inserted in place ot the words "cystic
fibrosis". Cystic fibrosis carriers are largely immune to the effects of
cholera.]

We are a work in progress. If we are made in his image, his image seems
to
include "successive approximation". Assuming you don't like the word
"evolution", try those two.

David A. Smith


  #4  
Old August 22nd 04, 05:44 PM
Ed Conrad
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:30:33 -0700, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" N:
dlzc1 D:cox wrote:

Let me try this again...

Dear Ed Conrad:

"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
news


On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!
An insult to science is really what it is.
Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.


The appendix.
The commonality in the chromosomes between man, chimpanzee, even yeast.
The skeletal record dating back hundreds of thousands of years (your
evolutionary link).
Changes in genome to provide immunity to malaria, and cholera (and
many others).

[Note: the word "cholera" was inserted in place ot the words "cystic
fibrosis". Cystic fibrosis carriers are largely immune to the effects of
cholera.]

We are a work in progress. If we are made in his image, his image seems
to
include "successive approximation". Assuming you don't like the word
"evolution", try those two.

David A. Smith

Deceit, deception
or
Collusion, conspiracy

There! Are you happy now?
  #5  
Old August 22nd 04, 06:23 PM
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dear Ed Conrad:

"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:30:33 -0700, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" N:
dlzc1 D:cox wrote:

Let me try this again...

Dear Ed Conrad:

"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
news


On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!
An insult to science is really what it is.
Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.


The appendix.
The commonality in the chromosomes between man, chimpanzee, even yeast.
The skeletal record dating back hundreds of thousands of years (your
evolutionary link).
Changes in genome to provide immunity to malaria, and cholera (and
many others).

[Note: the word "cholera" was inserted in place ot the words "cystic
fibrosis". Cystic fibrosis carriers are largely immune to the effects

of
cholera.]

We are a work in progress. If we are made in his image, his image

seems
to
include "successive approximation". Assuming you don't like the word
"evolution", try those two.

David A. Smith

Deceit, deception
or
Collusion, conspiracy

There! Are you happy now?


Apparently happier than you.

David A. Smith


  #6  
Old August 22nd 04, 06:47 PM
Rene PE1RA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear Ed Conrad:

"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
news


On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!
An insult to science is really what it is.


Apart from all the other remarks in this matter, science really is _NOT_
about finding evidence, but about hypotheses, working with them and trying
to disprove (!) them.

So, contrary to popular belief (and maybe some scientists believe this too),
science is about falsification instead of finding evidence.

My 2 cents...


--
René Altena - PE1RA
Nijverdal - The Netherlands - JO32FJ
pe1ra @ amsat.org - http://qsy.to/pe1ra

Go QRP! Radio spectrum is too valuable for QRO!


  #7  
Old August 22nd 04, 08:39 PM
Tim K.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
news


On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!
An insult to science is really what it is.
Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.


So what sort of evidence would a superstitious person such as you consider
valid that Homo sapiens evolved?
You don't seem to know what evolution is, so I'm not looking for a
meaningful answer.
I'm just curious what *you* would consider to be evidence.
I suspect it has to do with a mention in the bible.



  #8  
Old August 22nd 04, 10:09 PM
vonroach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:15:23 GMT, Ed Conrad
wrote:

Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.

Don't you ever wonder, Gregg, how the decent, honest
conscientious scientists in other fields must feel about
this mockery of scientific integrity that has long been perpetratred
by this cast of vested-interest boo-birds.

Every time they face true facts and are confronted with physical
evidence, they boo -- then tell one of their 1,000,000 bagfuls of lies


You disappoint me ED, I'd always looked upon you as the best evidence
we have.
  #9  
Old August 24th 04, 12:57 AM
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
news


On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!



Hello Ed, my hobby is the mathematics of evolution. I can assure
you evolution is a tangible and pervasive property of the
universe. In fact, all organization in the universe, material
or living, owes it's existence to the tendencies of evolutionary
forces.


The 'integral' of evolutionary mathematics is found in random
boolean networks. A nice intro is here.

An Introduction to Complex Systems
Torsten Reil, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~quee0818/comp...omplexity.html


The basic idea is that given enough complexity and interaction
any system will self-organize. It does so spontaneously, and
this tendency to organize and adapt is now shown mathematically
to be the final probable state of any complex dynamic system
living or otherwise.


The utter simplicity of evolution, and the universe, is easy
to see. The second law provides increasing complexity
and interaction by breaking things down into smaller
units. The increasing variability and interaction that
results are the driving forces for self-organization and
evolution. This tentative 'fourth law' of thermodynamics
provides symmetry with the second.

A nice review of the major topics of the mathematics
of evolution is here.

Self-Organizing Systems (SOS) FAQ
http://www.calresco.org/sos/sosfaq.htm


An online book being taught at the graduate level at
MIT is here. It explains this new science quite
thoroughly. It's a science so new most in this
ng haven't even heard of it, let alone understand
it.

DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS
http://www.necsi.org/publications/dcs/


Once you've read through this stuff and understand
it, you'll be able to call classical science a crock, and
be able to prove it. You have no idea just how 'Dark Age'
much of the scientific world is even today.

If you wish to truly see and denounce the stunning
level of ignorance in classical science
this new science is for you.

It also shows you a number of neat tricks, like
how to play the stock market for instance. Makes
such things child's play once one understands the
nuts and bolts of system dynamics.

Take a good look at the stock chart of the company
I sold today, wsii. When are the variables 'complex'?
When is the system at the edge of chaos? What pattern
defines a static pre-image vs a chaotic pre-image?

What system dynamics causes the universal behavior
of self-organization? A universal behavior where the hidden
inward mechanisms become irrelevant. Once you understand
these concepts you'll see them everywhere
....everywhere.

And you'll know their truth.


Jonathan


s





An insult to science is really what it is.
Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.

Don't you ever wonder, Gregg, how the decent, honest
conscientious scientists in other fields must feel about
this mockery of scientific integrity that has long been perpetratred
by this cast of vested-interest boo-birds.

Every time they face true facts and are confronted with physical
evidence, they boo -- then tell one of their 1,000,000 bagfuls of lies

=========================================

===========================================

MAN AS OLD AS COAL
Petrified Bones, Teeth and Soft Organs
(Some Human) Found Between Coal Veins

===========================================

OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/krogwskull.jpg

Wilton Krogman, one of the world's foremost experts
on human anatomy, holds what he had identified as
a petrified human calvarium, a skull with the eye
sockets broken off, that was discovered between
Pennsylvania's anthracite veins. He is shown at his
desk at the Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., where
moments later he beckoned a colleague -- a medical
doctor -- to examine "the oldest human skull ever
found."

A CATscan was performed on this specimen with
favorable results.

http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg


Meanwhile, Haversian canals were identified in the
cell structue, the tell-tale sign of bone. And dried
blood was found on the specimen during testing at
American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.

This is the official report from AML which had
erformed Calculus Analysis by Crystallography.
The final report, dated April 21, 2000, was issued
by Dr. Nathan Sherman, director of laboratories.

"The specimen consists of 1 irregularly
shaped, brown calculus weighing less
than 0.0010 grams and measuring 1X1X0.5
mm. No nidus is observed. The calculi
indicates a composition of dried blood
intermingled with a few small crystals
resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."

http://www.edconrad.com/images/z12calv.jpg

http://www.edconrad.com/images/z13cav.jpg
=============================================

OTHER PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH AND
SOFT ORGANS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS
Here'sa petrified human femur still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg

Here's a petrified human finger, with fingernail:
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG

Here's a petrified human toe (with toe nail), found only
10-15 feet from the petrified finger.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG

Here are the petrified human finger and the petrified
human toe shown together.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG

Here's the specimen that Krogman identified as a tibia
It contains Haversian canals, proof of bone, and dried
blood was found on it during testing at American Medical
Laboratories. This is the specimen that was fraudulently
tested by Andrew MacRae who produced microscopic photos
of the cell structure of a rock on the false pretext
that he was showing the cell structure of this specimen.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg

This is the boulder containing the complete human skull.
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg

Here's a petrified human mandible (frontal).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG

Here's a portion of a human mandible (side).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG

Here's a giant petrified tooth.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg

Here's a petrified dinosaur foot still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg

Here's a petrified fetus of some large animal.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG

Here's another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG

Here are several views of portion of a giant prehistoric
scorpion identified as such by Krogman.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG

Here's a photo of the same portion of a petrified giant
scorpion -- found 22 years ago -- alongside one found
weeks ago.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG

Here are two views of a piece of wood that appears to have
been handcarved for use as a tool or a weapon.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG

================================================== ===

LATEST DISCOVERIES: NEW Petrified Human Finger, Thumb

http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/O11/MVC-038S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/O11/MVC-037S.JPG






  #10  
Old August 24th 04, 01:13 PM
Oriel36
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jonathan" wrote in message ...
"Ed Conrad" wrote in message
news


On 2 May 2001 18:12:35 -0400, "Gregg" wrote
to talk.origins. My reply is better late than never.

evolution is backed up by plenty of good science and evidence,

Hardly the case!



Hello Ed, my hobby is the mathematics of evolution. I can assure
you evolution is a tangible and pervasive property of the
universe. In fact, all organization in the universe, material
or living, owes it's existence to the tendencies of evolutionary
forces.


The 'integral' of evolutionary mathematics is found in random
boolean networks. A nice intro is here.

An Introduction to Complex Systems
Torsten Reil, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~quee0818/comp...omplexity.html


The basic idea is that given enough complexity and interaction
any system will self-organize. It does so spontaneously, and
this tendency to organize and adapt is now shown mathematically
to be the final probable state of any complex dynamic system
living or otherwise.


The utter simplicity of evolution, and the universe, is easy
to see. The second law provides increasing complexity
and interaction by breaking things down into smaller
units. The increasing variability and interaction that
results are the driving forces for self-organization and
evolution. This tentative 'fourth law' of thermodynamics
provides symmetry with the second.

A nice review of the major topics of the mathematics
of evolution is here.

Self-Organizing Systems (SOS) FAQ
http://www.calresco.org/sos/sosfaq.htm


An online book being taught at the graduate level at
MIT is here. It explains this new science quite
thoroughly. It's a science so new most in this
ng haven't even heard of it, let alone understand
it.


This new science is just a different form of creationism for most
people respect that there are natural balances which condition the
emergence of humanity which can appreceate them.These balances have
been known for millenia,Plato mentions it so does Kepler but the
geometry to which these balances tend do not suffer the brutish
mentality to pin them down and turn them into a form of ultility or a
tool for humanity.Do so and the balances wither and die,love something
as it is and it will remain where simplicity is just a beautiful as
complexity.

http://people.ucsc.edu/~erowland/divine.jpg

The seashell which served the geologist in his endeavor so many years
ago also serves those good enough to appreceate the strife between
harmony and invention and what good becomes of it.You,like the
fundamentalist never seem to learn the lesson,for all the hoopla of
the advancement of science and placing order in nature,it has produced
the opposite effect and seen the rise of fundamentalism to
boot,sometimes hard enough to tell the difference between you.

Above all,it seems none of you love nature,it seems an exercise on how
nature makes you look good among yourselves and the total absence of
any love of the creations of natural forms is now mirrored in the
decline of those human creations for anything other than packaged
economic purposes,celebrity and things like that.

The foundation of your new science is warmed over statistics that you
assign the term qm to,it begins in chaos and ends in chaos much as its
relativistic rival does,these things borne of man's wild imagination
rather than the disciplined investigations of our ancestors.If,after a
century,the result is the rise in fundamentalism surely there are
those who are responsible enough to know that something has gone badly
wrong even without knowing where or how for ultimately it all descends
into overheated mediocrity and it is showing everywhere.

The creationists now use the phi proportion to batter the opposition
with in terms of evolutionary design,this polarisation is the signal
to turn to denominational Christianity to reign in the excesses of a
scientific community that has become a cancer in natural
investigations regardless of the validity of concepts which were
inherited from noble traditions of the past.With reluctance,it is now
to another group of people I now turn for mediocrity and silence in
the face of a battle between truly awful bad positions is never an
answer.






DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS
http://www.necsi.org/publications/dcs/


Once you've read through this stuff and understand
it, you'll be able to call classical science a crock, and
be able to prove it. You have no idea just how 'Dark Age'
much of the scientific world is even today.

If you wish to truly see and denounce the stunning
level of ignorance in classical science
this new science is for you.

It also shows you a number of neat tricks, like
how to play the stock market for instance. Makes
such things child's play once one understands the
nuts and bolts of system dynamics.

Take a good look at the stock chart of the company
I sold today, wsii. When are the variables 'complex'?
When is the system at the edge of chaos? What pattern
defines a static pre-image vs a chaotic pre-image?

What system dynamics causes the universal behavior
of self-organization? A universal behavior where the hidden
inward mechanisms become irrelevant. Once you understand
these concepts you'll see them everywhere
...everywhere.

And you'll know their truth.


Jonathan


s





An insult to science is really what it is.
Accompanied by the fact that it has NO physical evidence --.
Zilch! -- to prove man has any evolutionary link whatsoever
to some (any) preshistoric animal.

Don't you ever wonder, Gregg, how the decent, honest
conscientious scientists in other fields must feel about
this mockery of scientific integrity that has long been perpetratred
by this cast of vested-interest boo-birds.

Every time they face true facts and are confronted with physical
evidence, they boo -- then tell one of their 1,000,000 bagfuls of lies

=========================================

===========================================

MAN AS OLD AS COAL
Petrified Bones, Teeth and Soft Organs
(Some Human) Found Between Coal Veins

===========================================

OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/krogwskull.jpg

Wilton Krogman, one of the world's foremost experts
on human anatomy, holds what he had identified as
a petrified human calvarium, a skull with the eye
sockets broken off, that was discovered between
Pennsylvania's anthracite veins. He is shown at his
desk at the Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., where
moments later he beckoned a colleague -- a medical
doctor -- to examine "the oldest human skull ever
found."

A CATscan was performed on this specimen with
favorable results.

http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg

Meanwhile, Haversian canals were identified in the
cell structue, the tell-tale sign of bone. And dried
blood was found on the specimen during testing at
American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.

This is the official report from AML which had
erformed Calculus Analysis by Crystallography.
The final report, dated April 21, 2000, was issued
by Dr. Nathan Sherman, director of laboratories.

"The specimen consists of 1 irregularly
shaped, brown calculus weighing less
than 0.0010 grams and measuring 1X1X0.5
mm. No nidus is observed. The calculi
indicates a composition of dried blood
intermingled with a few small crystals
resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."

http://www.edconrad.com/images/z12calv.jpg

http://www.edconrad.com/images/z13cav.jpg
=============================================

OTHER PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH AND
SOFT ORGANS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS
Here'sa petrified human femur still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg

Here's a petrified human finger, with fingernail:
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG

Here's a petrified human toe (with toe nail), found only
10-15 feet from the petrified finger.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG

Here are the petrified human finger and the petrified
human toe shown together.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG

Here's the specimen that Krogman identified as a tibia
It contains Haversian canals, proof of bone, and dried
blood was found on it during testing at American Medical
Laboratories. This is the specimen that was fraudulently
tested by Andrew MacRae who produced microscopic photos
of the cell structure of a rock on the false pretext
that he was showing the cell structure of this specimen.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg

This is the boulder containing the complete human skull.
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg

Here's a petrified human mandible (frontal).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG

Here's a portion of a human mandible (side).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG

Here's a giant petrified tooth.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg

Here's a petrified dinosaur foot still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg

Here's a petrified fetus of some large animal.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG

Here's another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG

Here are several views of portion of a giant prehistoric
scorpion identified as such by Krogman.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG

Here's a photo of the same portion of a petrified giant
scorpion -- found 22 years ago -- alongside one found
weeks ago.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG

Here are two views of a piece of wood that appears to have
been handcarved for use as a tool or a weapon.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
================================================== ===

LATEST DISCOVERIES: NEW Petrified Human Finger, Thumb

http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/O11/MVC-038S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/O11/MVC-037S.JPG




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let's Destroy The Myth Of Astrology!! GFHWalker Astronomy Misc 11 December 9th 03 10:28 PM
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 8 August 31st 03 02:53 AM
"The Eagle has landed" NOT! Jay Windley UK Astronomy 0 August 16th 03 02:08 AM
"The Eagle has landed" NOT! Jay Windley Misc 0 August 16th 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.