![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Halton Arp is to the 21st century what Galileo was to the 17th. Both
were respected scientists, popular leaders in their field. Both made observations which contradicted the accepted theories. Seventeenth century academics felt threatened by Galileo's observations and so, backed by ecclesiastical authority, they ordered him to stop looking. Twentieth century astronomers felt threatened by Arp's observations and so, backed by institutional authority, they ordered him to stop looking. Both refused. Both published works geared to the non-specialist when specialists would no longer take note. Galileo's paper, "A Dialogue on the Two Chief Systems of the World", favored a heliocentric model of the solar system and undermined the accepted geocentric model. Arp's books, "Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies" and "Seeing Red" favor a steady-state model of the universe and undermine the accepted big bang model. .............. STATE OF THE UNIVERSE 2002 THE BIG BANG is dead. It's a theory based on a theory based on an assumption made nearly 75 years ago, that THE ONLYCAUSE OF REDSHIFT IS RECESSIONAL VELOCITY. And that assumption was wrong. Observations in 1911 of intrinsic redshift in young stars crippled the recessional redshift of galaxies before it was imagined. Halton Arp's identification of physical connections between high-redshift quasars and low-redshift active galaxies in the late 60's dealt the mortal blow. The discovery of quantization of redshifts signed the death certificate. Still the Big Bang rises, vampire-like, to haunt the night, sapping the vitality and the integrity of astronomy. Photos are cropped between active galaxies and their ejected quasars. Dark matter spawns dark energy. Unquestioned superstitions and ritual mathematics adorn a conceptual graveyard into which are interred billions of dollars of public funds. An intrinsic interpretation of the redshift will imply a much different universe. For example, in the middle of the constellation of Virgo, the brightest galaxies, the brightest quasars and brightest clusters of galaxies are connected by the strongest radio and x-ray fields in the sky. The expanding universe assumption - that redshift equals velocity equals distance - separates these objects by billions of light-years, and assumes their side-by-side position is coincidental. But it's not coincidence. These objects belong together. They make up an evolving galactic family whose genealogy can be traced through four generations. We'll never "see" this universe as long as we remain captive in the coffin of the Big Bang viewpoint. The assumption that redshift can only be caused by recessional velocity predetermines a distorted understanding of the shape, age, size, and physical characteristics of most of the extragalactic universe. A different - intrinsic - interpretation of the redshift will imply a much different universe. Even the meaning of the terms we use to describe that universe will have to change. Take, for example, the term, "galactic cluster." That term is currently defined by the yardstick of Big Bang expansion: at least 30 galaxies (in addition to the brightest two) within a range of 2 magnitudes and approximately the same redshift. According to this definition, there are 4,073 clusters (listed in the revised northern and southern Abell Catalogue.) Now let's look at a galactic cluster in the non-Big Bang universe. Let's assume (as Halton Arp's observations seem to suggest) that a galactic cluster is a family of galaxies and quasars and gaseous clouds of varying redshifts. At the center, we find a dominant galaxy - it's usually the largest galaxy, and the galaxy with the lowest redshift of the cluster. This dominant galaxy is surrounded by low-to-medium redshift galaxies, and toward the edges of the cluster we find the highest redshift galaxies, HII regions, BL Lac objects and quasars. Mo http://www.dragonscience.com/red/arpteaser.html http://users.aol.com/arpgalaxy/story/ http://cic.cstb.fr/amsee/projects/arp/arp.htm http://www.astr.ua.edu/keel/agn/ngc1275hst.html -- Usenet is filled with abusive and obsessive-compulsive-sociopathic personality disorder sufferers which makes it all the more easily ignored, dismissed and ridiculed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? | Yoda | Misc | 102 | August 2nd 04 02:33 AM |
Wednesday, Sep 29 -- the first SpaceShipOne flight in a two-part try at the X-Prize. | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 27th 04 10:09 PM |
Wednesday, Sep 29 -- the first SpaceShipOne flight in a two-part try at the X-Prize. | Jim Oberg | Policy | 0 | July 27th 04 10:09 PM |
SS1 flight set for June 21 | Hop David | Policy | 127 | June 16th 04 07:50 AM |