A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Big Bang is Dead - Arp Deserves the Noble Prize



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old September 6th 04, 11:37 PM
Mad Scientist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Big Bang is Dead - Arp Deserves the Noble Prize

Halton Arp is to the 21st century what Galileo was to the 17th. Both
were respected scientists, popular leaders in their field. Both made
observations which contradicted the accepted theories. Seventeenth
century academics felt threatened by Galileo's observations and so,
backed by ecclesiastical authority, they ordered him to stop looking.
Twentieth century astronomers felt threatened by Arp's observations and
so, backed by
institutional authority, they ordered him to stop looking.

Both refused. Both published works geared to the non-specialist when
specialists would no longer take note. Galileo's paper, "A Dialogue on
the Two Chief Systems of the World", favored a heliocentric model of the
solar system and undermined the accepted geocentric model. Arp's books,
"Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies" and "Seeing Red" favor a
steady-state model of the universe and undermine the accepted big bang
model.

..............


STATE OF THE UNIVERSE 2002


THE BIG BANG is dead.
It's a theory based on a theory based on an assumption made nearly 75
years ago, that THE ONLYCAUSE OF REDSHIFT IS RECESSIONAL VELOCITY. And
that assumption was wrong. Observations in 1911 of intrinsic redshift in
young stars crippled the recessional redshift of galaxies before it was
imagined. Halton Arp's identification of physical connections between
high-redshift quasars and low-redshift active galaxies in the late 60's
dealt the mortal blow. The discovery of quantization of redshifts signed
the death certificate.

Still the Big Bang rises, vampire-like, to haunt the night, sapping the
vitality and the integrity of astronomy. Photos are cropped between
active galaxies and their ejected quasars. Dark matter spawns dark energy.

Unquestioned superstitions and ritual mathematics adorn a conceptual
graveyard into which are interred billions of dollars of public funds.

An intrinsic interpretation of the redshift will imply a much different
universe. For example, in the middle of the constellation of Virgo, the
brightest galaxies, the brightest quasars and brightest clusters of
galaxies are connected by the strongest radio and x-ray fields in the
sky. The expanding universe assumption - that redshift equals velocity
equals distance - separates these objects by billions of light-years,
and assumes their side-by-side position is coincidental. But it's not
coincidence. These objects belong together. They make up an evolving
galactic family whose genealogy can be traced through four generations.

We'll never "see" this universe as long as we remain captive in the
coffin of the Big Bang viewpoint. The assumption that redshift can only
be caused by recessional velocity predetermines a distorted
understanding of the shape, age, size, and physical characteristics of
most of the extragalactic universe. A different - intrinsic -
interpretation of the redshift will imply a much different universe.
Even the meaning of the terms we use to describe that universe will have
to change.
Take, for example, the term, "galactic cluster." That term is currently
defined by the yardstick of Big Bang expansion: at least 30 galaxies (in
addition to the brightest two) within a range of 2 magnitudes and
approximately the same redshift. According to this definition, there are
4,073 clusters (listed in the revised northern and southern Abell
Catalogue.)

Now let's look at a galactic cluster in the non-Big Bang universe.
Let's assume (as Halton Arp's observations seem to suggest) that a
galactic cluster is a family of galaxies and quasars and gaseous clouds
of varying redshifts. At the center, we find a dominant galaxy - it's
usually the largest galaxy, and the galaxy with the lowest redshift of
the cluster.
This dominant galaxy is surrounded by low-to-medium redshift galaxies,
and toward the edges of the cluster we find the highest redshift
galaxies, HII regions, BL Lac objects and quasars.

Mo
http://www.dragonscience.com/red/arpteaser.html
http://users.aol.com/arpgalaxy/story/
http://cic.cstb.fr/amsee/projects/arp/arp.htm
http://www.astr.ua.edu/keel/agn/ngc1275hst.html

--
Usenet is filled with abusive and obsessive-compulsive-sociopathic personality disorder sufferers which makes it all the more easily ignored, dismissed and ridiculed.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? Yoda Misc 102 August 2nd 04 02:33 AM
Wednesday, Sep 29 -- the first SpaceShipOne flight in a two-part try at the X-Prize. Jim Oberg Space Shuttle 0 July 27th 04 10:09 PM
Wednesday, Sep 29 -- the first SpaceShipOne flight in a two-part try at the X-Prize. Jim Oberg Policy 0 July 27th 04 10:09 PM
SS1 flight set for June 21 Hop David Policy 127 June 16th 04 07:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.