![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear David Woolley:
"David Woolley" wrote in message ... In article 8B9Wc.5797$L94.1999@fed1read07, \""N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"\"" N: dlzc1 D:cox " (assumed bogus/unauthorised use of domain) wrote: Disguised actually. Mars. The line of action of gravitation appears to be instantaneous between orbitting bodies, so that distance is a non-issue to the effect. That gravitational effects propagate at the speed of light (within experimental error (which is at least 10 times smaller than c)) was re-verified in the last year. Citation? Last I'd heard, attempts ot measure the "speed of gravitation" were simply disguised measurements of "speed of light". I've been presenting this as "the space produced by Mars, orbits with Mars", Mars in this example. Not sufficient? Spacetime is extension of mass/energy, so "line of action" doesn't apply. David A. Smith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 14 | August 30th 04 11:09 PM |
Space Calendar - July 28, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 04 05:18 PM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 25th 04 04:37 PM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2004 | Ron | Misc | 0 | June 25th 04 04:37 PM |