Standard Model Incomplete

Well at least real astronomers and physicists are aware of the holes in
the standard model and thus are aware of how incomplete the Big Bang
theory truly has to be. Also it is interesting to note how the science
of astrophysics is increasingly aware of an invisible part of the
universe. I will be interesting to watch how developments in this field
move either forwards or backwards.
---


Particle collider edges forward

A key decision on the International Linear Collider, one of the grand
scientific projects of the 21st Century, has been taken in China.

Physicists told a Beijing conference that the multi-billion-dollar
project should use superconducting technology to create its particle
collisions.

These would be high-energy impacts inside a 30km-long laboratory.

The experiments should give scientists a deeper understanding of the
materials used to construct the Universe.

At the moment, the so-called Standard Model of particles and their
interactions provides only a partial picture of the nature of the normal
matter we see around us.

Researchers know, however, the cosmos is dominated by other material
which is invisible to current detection technologies.

FULL ARTICLE:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3583658.stm

---

Notice how there is an admission that the Standard Model is grossly
incomplete without implicating predictions and models such as the Big
Bang theory. Perhaps any new findings will get the usual cover-up so
the lie of the Big Bang remains intact. Time will tell.

nightbat wrote

Mad Scientist wrote:

Well at least real astronomers and physicists are aware of the holes in
the standard model and thus are aware of how incomplete the Big Bang
theory truly has to be. Also it is interesting to note how the science
of astrophysics is increasingly aware of an invisible part of the
universe. I will be interesting to watch how developments in this field
move either forwards or backwards.

nightbat

Yes, the coherent model that combines the perceived gravity
force with the other three forces for unification of the quantum and
relativity theories is not ascertained via any single elegant immediate
consistent resolution. A very tall task to say the least.

---

Particle collider edges forward

A key decision on the International Linear Collider, one of the grand
scientific projects of the 21st Century, has been taken in China.

Physicists told a Beijing conference that the multi-billion-dollar
project should use superconducting technology to create its particle
collisions.

These would be high-energy impacts inside a 30km-long laboratory.

The experiments should give scientists a deeper understanding of the
materials used to construct the Universe.

At the moment, the so-called Standard Model of particles and their
interactions provides only a partial picture of the nature of the normal
matter we see around us.

Researchers know, however, the cosmos is dominated by other material
which is invisible to current detection technologies.

FULL ARTICLE:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3583658.stm

---

Notice how there is an admission that the Standard Model is grossly
incomplete without implicating predictions and models such as the Big
Bang theory. Perhaps any new findings will get the usual cover-up so
the lie of the Big Bang remains intact. Time will tell.

nightbat

No need to be so pessimistic Mad Scientist, for the theoretical
Big Bang theory and Standard Model while incomplete, acts as the best
pointing and empirical test consistent view of the Universe to date.
Just that additionally, astro scientist's suspect, because of the
immense space vacuum, expanding universe's present view, and observed
separation of energy and matter including exploding stellar bodies via
deduced super nova and nova evidence and signature remnants, at one time
resultantly, something apparently must have really really big gone point
everywhere bang in the night.


the nightbat

nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote

Mad Scientist wrote:

Well at least real astronomers and physicists are aware of the holes in
the standard model and thus are aware of how incomplete the Big Bang
theory truly has to be. Also it is interesting to note how the science
of astrophysics is increasingly aware of an invisible part of the
universe. I will be interesting to watch how developments in this field
move either forwards or backwards.


nightbat

Yes, the coherent model that combines the perceived gravity
force with the other three forces for unification of the quantum and
relativity theories is not ascertained via any single elegant immediate
consistent resolution. A very tall task to say the least.


---

Particle collider edges forward

A key decision on the International Linear Collider, one of the grand
scientific projects of the 21st Century, has been taken in China.

Physicists told a Beijing conference that the multi-billion-dollar
project should use superconducting technology to create its particle
collisions.

These would be high-energy impacts inside a 30km-long laboratory.

The experiments should give scientists a deeper understanding of the
materials used to construct the Universe.

At the moment, the so-called Standard Model of particles and their
interactions provides only a partial picture of the nature of the normal
matter we see around us.

Researchers know, however, the cosmos is dominated by other material
which is invisible to current detection technologies.

FULL ARTICLE:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3583658.stm

---

Notice how there is an admission that the Standard Model is grossly
incomplete without implicating predictions and models such as the Big
Bang theory. Perhaps any new findings will get the usual cover-up so
the lie of the Big Bang remains intact. Time will tell.


nightbat

No need to be so pessimistic Mad Scientist, for the theoretical
Big Bang theory and Standard Model while incomplete, acts as the best
pointing and empirical test consistent view of the Universe to date.
Just that additionally, astro scientist's suspect, because of the
immense space vacuum, expanding universe's present view, and observed
separation of energy and matter including exploding stellar bodies via
deduced super nova and nova evidence and signature remnants, at one time
resultantly, something apparently must have really really big gone point
everywhere bang in the night.


the nightbat


It is cynicism but the Big Bang supporters omit observations that
contradict the theory all the time. The theory has been 'updated' too
many times to still be considered valid. If it were any other science,
it would have been discarded long ago. But the Big Bang supporters wish
the godless theory to remain, so while new evidence points to errors in
the theory, instead of being thrown in the trash bin where it belongs,
the evidence is retrofitted to the theory, while the math gets updated
and voila - Big Bang still around yet wrapped in new clothing.

Fact is its math pulled entirely out of thin air. The theory violates
all known laws of physics. It is unprovable and no observation can
prove it whatsoever. How does it violate known laws of physics? The
theory suggests another maximum value for the density of matter to
achieve. Astronomers already know that there are maximum values for
atomic-molecular density in stars before they go nova, or supernova.
They already know there is a maximum value of density before a neutron
star is squeezed to form a black hole singularity. They also know that
black holes have a maximum radius and thus maximum density factor. The
Big Bang theory contradicts those maximum values and this contradiction
is proposed to be a 'one time event' which only proves how much the math
used by physicists and cosmologists are so easily discarded. They can't
have it both ways, either the math is wrong when pertaining to the
density factors in stars before they go supernova, nova, and the density
factor of black holes is also wrong and higher density values are
possible, via the Big Bang theory.

Much more could be said concerning the evolution of particles as per the
Big Bang, which again suggests that unknown 'particles' at the moment of
the Big Bang led to the 'creation' and evolution of all the constituent
sub-particles we see today. It is pure balderdash passed off as science
when in reality it is nothing but pseudoscience. So astrophysicists who
support the Big Bang contradict their own theories regarding the birth,
evolution, death, and rebirth cycle of stars by insisting that at one
time in the univereses history, higher density values existed without a
shred of evidence to support it. Clearly the scientific world who buys
into the propaganda lie passed off as science, are hypnotized under a
spell to believe it. They can't have it both ways, either what they
know about atoms and sub-atomic particles is correct in their maximum
and minimum values for density relationships, or they aren't. By the
way, this is my evidence for why the Big Bang theory is bogus and if
anyone quotes it or uses it without giving me credit, they are stealing
it from me. This explanation is not anywhere on the internet yet and
this is the first time I post it anywhere. Time will tell if this
explanation gets stolen.