![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Could I have the groups opinion on which of these binoculars is best for astronomy. I have a pair of 10x50's but keep reading that 7x50's are best. I'm aware of teh issues of exit pupil, light pollution etc, but wondered what people's real experiences have told them about 7x50's. Also if it is the case that the latter are deemed better, could some suggestions as to the best value pair be made? I have read that the orion scenix 7x50's are very good. Anyone used these? Thanks for your help Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mark.worthington wrote:
Hi, Could I have the groups opinion on which of these binoculars is best for astronomy. I have a pair of 10x50's but keep reading that 7x50's are best. Stick with the 10x50 unless you find them impossible to hand-hold. (Or mount them, even on an up-turned broom). The 10x50 give better contrast and IMNSVHO they are generally better. But try lots of different ones -- not all 10x50 (or any other size) are alike. Apart from pure optical quality, the vignetting due to internal baffle placement means that some have a significantly bigger fully illuminated than others. For example, I have a wide-angle 10x50 whose fully illuminated field is less than a degree. Half a degree from the edge of field it's equivalent to a 10x20 (yes, that's right; more than 3/4 of the light is cut off by baffles near the edge of field!). Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Stephen Tonkin | ATM Resources; Astro-Tutorials; Astro Books + + (N51.162 E0.995) | http://astunit.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The higher the magnification, the more pronounced the movement of your arms
while attempting to observe. Any shakiness will lessen the both the pleasure of observing, and the ability to study an object. 10x magnification is said to be the upper limit for holding. I have a pair of 10 x 50's and am happy with them, however I tend to use them to briefly scan the area that the scope will be pointing to rather than observing. 7 x 50 will still detect 150 000 stars (50x more than the naked eye). Regards Chris "mark.worthington" wrote in message ... Hi, Could I have the groups opinion on which of these binoculars is best for astronomy. I have a pair of 10x50's but keep reading that 7x50's are best. I'm aware of teh issues of exit pupil, light pollution etc, but wondered what people's real experiences have told them about 7x50's. Also if it is the case that the latter are deemed better, could some suggestions as to the best value pair be made? I have read that the orion scenix 7x50's are very good. Anyone used these? Thanks for your help Mark |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"mark.worthington" wrote in
: Hi, Could I have the groups opinion on which of these binoculars is best for astronomy. I have a pair of 10x50's but keep reading that 7x50's are best. I'm aware of teh issues of exit pupil, light pollution etc, but wondered what people's real experiences have told them about 7x50's. Get a tripod. Even a cheapo one will transform bins like yours, and will be steady enough for practical use. Make sure it's nice and tall, as the bins will have to end up with the eyepieces at or just above your eye height mike r |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike ring" wrote in message 52.50... "mark.worthington" wrote in : Hi, Could I have the groups opinion on which of these binoculars is best for astronomy. I have a pair of 10x50's but keep reading that 7x50's are best. I'm aware of teh issues of exit pupil, light pollution etc, but wondered what people's real experiences have told them about 7x50's. Get a tripod. Even a cheapo one will transform bins like yours, and will be steady enough for practical use. Make sure it's nice and tall, as the bins will have to end up with the eyepieces at or just above your eye height mike r Or even a monopod. A monopod provides a reasonable amount of stability and is easily movable. Martin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin wrote:
Or even a monopod. Most of us have them already. We call them brooms. Brush-side up, with the bins lightly bunjeed to the "head" (with an intervening jaycloth if the broom is well-used for its intended purpose), they make wonderful emergency monopods. Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Stephen Tonkin | ATM Resources; Astro-Tutorials; Astro Books + + (N51.162 E0.995) | http://astunit.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Helios Ultimate HR 7x50 | Yunus | UK Astronomy | 0 | November 26th 03 11:48 PM |
Fujinon U.S. Navy 7x50 binocs | Patrick | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | November 3rd 03 07:51 PM |
Newbie watching Mars with Nikon Action 7x50 Binoculars (#7201) | Josh Gregorio | Misc | 0 | August 22nd 03 06:50 PM |