![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid
then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall into a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience my death. -- BV. www.iheartmypond.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Benign Vanilla" wrote in message
... I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall into a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience my death. For the observer within the field, or approaching the speed of light, time does not appear to be any different for him. It's the external observer who sees the slowing of time for the one in the field, or moving at great velocity. No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at the singularity itself). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Neill" wrote in message . .. "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall into a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience my death. For the observer within the field, or approaching the speed of light, time does not appear to be any different for him. It's the external observer who sees the slowing of time for the one in the field, or moving at great velocity. No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at the singularity itself). That is a KEY fact that I didn't include in my question. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Now how about this... I am in a spaceship that has been sucked into a black hole. The Swedish Bikini team is orbiting the BH, and has a special camera that allows them to watch me fall towards the singularity. From their frame of reference outside of mine, time will appear to slow dramatically. So will they be tortured for eons watching me slowly fall towards impending death? -- BV. www.iheartmypond.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BV This post is behind the times . Bert
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... "Greg Neill" wrote in message . .. "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall into a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience my death. For the observer within the field, or approaching the speed of light, time does not appear to be any different for him. It's the external observer who sees the slowing of time for the one in the field, or moving at great velocity. No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at the singularity itself). That is a KEY fact that I didn't include in my question. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Now how about this... I am in a spaceship that has been sucked into a black hole. The Swedish Bikini team is orbiting the BH, and has a special camera that allows them to watch me fall towards the singularity. From their frame of reference outside of mine, time will appear to slow dramatically. So will they be tortured for eons watching me slowly fall towards impending death? no, they will see you disappear behind the horizon. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , md
writes "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... "Greg Neill" wrote in message . .. "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall into a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience my death. For the observer within the field, or approaching the speed of light, time does not appear to be any different for him. It's the external observer who sees the slowing of time for the one in the field, or moving at great velocity. No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at the singularity itself). That is a KEY fact that I didn't include in my question. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Now how about this... I am in a spaceship that has been sucked into a black hole. The Swedish Bikini team is orbiting the BH, and has a special camera that allows them to watch me fall towards the singularity. From their frame of reference outside of mine, time will appear to slow dramatically. So will they be tortured for eons watching me slowly fall towards impending death? no, they will see you disappear behind the horizon. But isn't the whole point of a black hole that BV's camera cannot exist, because nothing can pass out of the event horizon? Though there was a story in Analog magazine a few years ago in which telepathy is supposed to be some non-physical communication, so it isn't subject to this. One of a pair of telepaths falls into the hole, and the other has to "listen" to his/her last scream for the rest of his/her life (can't remember the genders !) -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Greg Neill
writes "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall into a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience my death. For the observer within the field, or approaching the speed of light, time does not appear to be any different for him. It's the external observer who sees the slowing of time for the one in the field, or moving at great velocity. No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at the singularity itself). I've been reading Joao Magueijo's "Faster than the speed of light" and he has a very different view. You can't pass the horizon, and time passes more slowly for the observer within the field. -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message
... I've been reading Joao Magueijo's "Faster than the speed of light" and he has a very different view. You can't pass the horizon, and time passes more slowly for the observer within the field. Indeed. Mr. Magueijo has some non-mainstream ideas. How could an observer, under any circumstances, measure his own rate of time passage to be slower or faster? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message ... In message , md writes "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... "Greg Neill" wrote in message . .. "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... I've read that time is slowed by large gravitational fields. Is it valid then, to say that an area with massive gravity could stop time, or slow it to a speed that provides the appearance of stoppage? If I were to fall into a black hole, the closer I got to the singularity, the slower I would perceive time, so as I got right up against it...maybe time would move so slowly from my frame of reference that it takes me "forever" to experience my death. For the observer within the field, or approaching the speed of light, time does not appear to be any different for him. It's the external observer who sees the slowing of time for the one in the field, or moving at great velocity. No amount of gravity will stop time for the observer located in its grip (that said, all bets are off at the singularity itself). That is a KEY fact that I didn't include in my question. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Now how about this... I am in a spaceship that has been sucked into a black hole. The Swedish Bikini team is orbiting the BH, and has a special camera that allows them to watch me fall towards the singularity. From their frame of reference outside of mine, time will appear to slow dramatically. So will they be tortured for eons watching me slowly fall towards impending death? no, they will see you disappear behind the horizon. But isn't the whole point of a black hole that BV's camera cannot exist, because nothing can pass out of the event horizon? exactly, that's why they see you *disappear* behind the event horizon. At the horizon, gravity is finite, time is not stopped. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... BV This post is behind the times . Bert Thanks Bert...How's Treb today? -- BV. www.iheartmypond.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. | Robert | Astronomy Misc | 133 | August 30th 04 01:31 AM |
Earth rotation | don findlay | Astronomy Misc | 122 | July 9th 04 07:57 PM |
Gas Planets Evolve to be Rock planets??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 114 | October 16th 03 12:51 PM |
Correlation between CMBR and Redshift Anisotropies. | The Ghost In The Machine | Astronomy Misc | 172 | August 30th 03 10:27 PM |