![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While reading the peterson field guide to the stars and planets, it gives
the diameter of M31 as 2 degrees and 40 arc minutes. It further states the diameters are a guide to the size of the object when seen through a 6-8 in reflector. What is the normal diameter when looking through the eyepiece? Can someone explain to me what degrees and arc minutes are? thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, you know how the Earth is divided by latitude and longitude? Well,
imagine a sort of latitude/longitude system projected on the sky. The Greenwich Meridian (0 deg. 0 hrs.) of the Sky is in Aries. There are 360 degrees until we come back there again. The moon is about 1/2 deg. wide (and by a wonderful coicidence so is the sun). If you If you extend your arm the width of your little finger at arms length is 1 degree. Take your first 3 fingers and hold them at arms length this is about 5 deg. So now that we know angular distances across the sky are measured in degrees, what about the 40 arcminutes? Each degree is divided into 60 arcminutes, and each arcminute is divided into 60 arseconds. So Mars back in August was 25 arcseconds across (it's now about 12). As for the eyepiece, saying what the diameter is when looking through any kind of scope is not relevant without knowing the power being employed. There are very few 6-8" scopes which can see the entire Andromeda galaxy at once. My widest eyepiece (which in my 10" dob is ) provides a true field of just over 2 degrees, so not enough to take in the entirety of M31. You can determine the field of your eyepieces/telescope with these formulae (you can get the numbers from the manufacturers): Power (magnification) = focal length of scope / focal length of eyepiece Apparent Field of View = field of view through the eyepiece alone True Field of View = apparent field / magnification For example, a 26mm Plossl with a 50 degree field of view, placed in a telescope with a focal length of 1200 mm, will have a magnification of about 46x (which is 1200 / 26), and a true field of view of just over 1 degree (1.09 degrees, which is 50 / 46). The same 26mm Plossl eyepiece, placed in a telescope with a focal length of 2032 mm, would have a magnification of 78x, and a true field of view of 0.64 degrees. Hope this helps "n3drk" wrote in message om... While reading the peterson field guide to the stars and planets, it gives the diameter of M31 as 2 degrees and 40 arc minutes. It further states the diameters are a guide to the size of the object when seen through a 6-8 in reflector. What is the normal diameter when looking through the eyepiece? Can someone explain to me what degrees and arc minutes are? thanks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi there. You posted:
While reading the peterson field guide to the stars and planets, it gives the diameter of M31 as 2 degrees and 40 arc minutes. It further states the diameters are a guide to the size of the object when seen through a 6-8 in reflector. What is the normal diameter when looking through the eyepiece? Can someone explain to me what degrees and arc minutes are? thanks Well, Degrees are a measure of angle rather than true physical size. The zenith (straight up) is 90 degrees in angle above the horizon. A degree of angular size on the sky is about twice the apparent diameter of the full moon, or about the size of a U.S. dime held about 40.4 inches away from your eye. A pair of binoculars might have a field of view on the sky of between 3 and 10 degrees (my 10x50's have a 7 degree field width on the sky (367 feet wide at 1000 yards away)). There really are no "normal" diameters of field with a telescope. Most low-power telescopic fields are less than a couple of degrees, although there are exceptions (like the so-called "rich-field" telescopes). Higher power results in a smaller true field of view, so fields can actually be only a small fraction of a degree when viewing objects like planets at high power. Degrees are also subdivided into arc minutes and arc seconds. There are 60 arc minutes in a degree and there are 3600 arc seconds in a degree. The Great Andromeda Galaxy has an apparent diameter of much more than two degrees. In a simple pair of 10x50 binoculars on a clear moonless night away from city lights, I can see the faintest outermost glow of the galaxy spanning a length of nearly 3 full degrees, and some detailed photometry has indicated that the galaxy may be as much as 4 full degrees in angular width. With my 4 inch refractor, I can see the entire galaxy at 20x with my widest-field eyepiece (a 30mm WideScan III), but in my big 10 inch Newtonian using that same eyepiece, I can often only get about half of the galaxy in the field at any one time. At higher powers, the field is even smaller (only two of my 10 eyepieces give me fields of view on the sky of a degree or more when used in my 10 inch). I usually do most of my observing with fields of view of less than one degree. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kilolani" wrote in message ink.net... Okay, you know how the Earth is divided by latitude and longitude? Well, imagine a sort of latitude/longitude system projected on the sky. The Greenwich Meridian (0 deg. 0 hrs.) of the Sky is in Aries. There are 360 degrees until we come back there again. The moon is about 1/2 deg. wide (and by a wonderful coicidence so is the sun). If you If you extend your arm the width of your little finger at arms length is 1 degree. Take your first 3 fingers and hold them at arms length this is about 5 deg. So now that we know angular distances across the sky are measured in degrees, what about the 40 arcminutes? Each degree is divided into 60 arcminutes, and each arcminute is divided into 60 arseconds. So Mars back in August was 25 arcseconds across (it's now about 12). As for the eyepiece, saying what the diameter is when looking through any kind of scope is not relevant without knowing the power being employed. There are very few 6-8" scopes which can see the entire Andromeda galaxy at once. My widest eyepiece (which in my 10" dob is ) provides a true field of just over 2 degrees, so not enough to take in the entirety of M31. You can determine the field of your eyepieces/telescope with these formulae (you can get the numbers from the manufacturers): Power (magnification) = focal length of scope / focal length of eyepiece Apparent Field of View = field of view through the eyepiece alone True Field of View = apparent field / magnification For example, a 26mm Plossl with a 50 degree field of view, placed in a telescope with a focal length of 1200 mm, will have a magnification of about 46x (which is 1200 / 26), and a true field of view of just over 1 degree (1.09 degrees, which is 50 / 46). The same 26mm Plossl eyepiece, placed in a telescope with a focal length of 2032 mm, would have a magnification of 78x, and a true field of view of 0.64 degrees. Hope this helps Just a couple of added 'comments', that may help to give an idea of what the sizes 'mean'. If you hold your fist out at arms length, this covers about 10 degrees. The width of a finger at the same distance, is about 1 degree. The Moon is about 1/2 degree (so about the size of a small 'pea' held at arms length). Jupiter is about the size of a small coin, 100 yards from you. When magnifications are applied, the effect (in terms of the 'angle' the objects take), is to divide the distance away by the magnification. So in the case of Jupiter, applying a 100* magnification, makes it cover the angle in the eyepiece, of the small coin, now just one yard away. With this magnification, it is actually larger than the 'naked eye' moon, but will often not appear so!. This is a classic 'optical illusion', which is quite interesting to demonstrate for yourself. Look at the Moon 'naked eye', and then look at again through a tube (a cardboard core from a kitchen towel roll for instance). Though the Moon itself does not change size, you 'see' it as smaller through the roll. The change is not much, but is enough, so that if you look at a planet like Jupiter through an eyepiece (which has the same effect on the human visual system as the cardboard tube), with the magnification carefully selected to make it appear the same size, it still tends to look smaller... As a general 'rule' on apparent sizes, 1" at 100yards, is one 'arc minute'. Best Wishes |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
question about the mechanism of energy conservation in free fall | Jim Jastrzebski | Research | 4 | November 27th 04 07:01 PM |
Hermes Found 66 Years Later - Long-Lost Object Is A Bright Binary | Ron Baalke | Misc | 27 | November 9th 03 11:53 PM |
NASA Releases Near-Earth Object Search Report | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 10th 03 04:39 PM |