Why Blackholes Don't Wobble ???

Three best reasons are a blackhole is natures most perfect sphere,and it
is spinning very close to light speed and lastly it has the most inertia
for its size. Reality is if a blackhole wobbled it would give its
presence away even if it was all alone(possibly anyway) Bert

Like to add that wobble creates waves that past through space at "C" and
in some cases instantaneously. That depends on the reference frame. It
these waves hit the Earth they would be received at the speed of "C" If
they were going from one end of the universe to another their travel
time would be zero. Bert

Like to add that wobble creates waves that past through space at "C" and
in some cases instantaneously. That depends on the reference frame. It
these waves hit the Earth they would be received at the speed of "C" If
they were going from one end of the universe to another their travel
time would be zero. Bert

(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in news:21908-3F63C97C-8
@storefull-2355.public.lawson.webtv.net:

Three best reasons are a blackhole is natures most perfect sphere,and it
is spinning very close to light speed and lastly it has the most inertia
for its size. Reality is if a blackhole wobbled it would give its
presence away even if it was all alone(possibly anyway) Bert



Blackholes are not spheres. The spherical black hole is one with no angular
momemtum, which can be described by the static Schwarzchild (excuse if I
got the spelling wrong) solution to Einstein's field equations. Any real
black hole will be better described by the Kerr solution. The event horizon
is not spherical in the Kerr solution.

Llanzlan

(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in news:21908-3F63C97C-8
@storefull-2355.public.lawson.webtv.net:

Three best reasons are a blackhole is natures most perfect sphere,and it
is spinning very close to light speed and lastly it has the most inertia
for its size. Reality is if a blackhole wobbled it would give its
presence away even if it was all alone(possibly anyway) Bert



Blackholes are not spheres. The spherical black hole is one with no angular
momemtum, which can be described by the static Schwarzchild (excuse if I
got the spelling wrong) solution to Einstein's field equations. Any real
black hole will be better described by the Kerr solution. The event horizon
is not spherical in the Kerr solution.

Llanzlan

Llanzian I'm going with GR as discribed by Werner Israel. Blackholes
are perfectly spherical. Roger Penrose,and John Wheeler agree on this.
However I could stand corrected for I'm smart enough to know an object
spinning very fast has to flattern at the poles,and bulge at its
equaton. I don't know Kerr,but I think he must have figured this out,for
it is reality. Still I claim a fast spinning (close to
"C") BH does not wobble. I'm consintrating my thoughts how wobble is
used by nature in both the micro and macro realm,and I'll keep posting
these thoughts more and more. I see a sameness in photon wave lengths
and wobble. I see a sameness in wobbling,and the vibrations of
strings(string theory).

Llanzian I'm going with GR as discribed by Werner Israel. Blackholes
are perfectly spherical. Roger Penrose,and John Wheeler agree on this.
However I could stand corrected for I'm smart enough to know an object
spinning very fast has to flattern at the poles,and bulge at its
equaton. I don't know Kerr,but I think he must have figured this out,for
it is reality. Still I claim a fast spinning (close to
"C") BH does not wobble. I'm consintrating my thoughts how wobble is
used by nature in both the micro and macro realm,and I'll keep posting
these thoughts more and more. I see a sameness in photon wave lengths
and wobble. I see a sameness in wobbling,and the vibrations of
strings(string theory).

(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in
:

Llanzian I'm going with GR as discribed by Werner Israel. Blackholes
are perfectly spherical. Roger Penrose,and John Wheeler agree on this.
However I could stand corrected for I'm smart enough to know an object
spinning very fast has to flattern at the poles,and bulge at its
equaton. I don't know Kerr,but I think he must have figured this
out,for it is reality. Still I claim a fast spinning
(close to "C") BH does not wobble. I'm consintrating my thoughts how
wobble is used by nature in both the micro and macro realm,and I'll
keep posting these thoughts more and more. I see a sameness in photon
wave lengths and wobble. I see a sameness in wobbling,and the
vibrations of strings(string theory).



They are giving a simplified account. In real nature, no black hole will
conform to the Schwarzchild solution. both Penrose and Wheeler are fully
aware of this.

See : http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...BlackHole.html


and

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...BlackHole.html


Roy Kerr:

http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/alumni/s...ges/disroy.htm


Regards Llanzlan

(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in
:

Llanzian I'm going with GR as discribed by Werner Israel. Blackholes
are perfectly spherical. Roger Penrose,and John Wheeler agree on this.
However I could stand corrected for I'm smart enough to know an object
spinning very fast has to flattern at the poles,and bulge at its
equaton. I don't know Kerr,but I think he must have figured this
out,for it is reality. Still I claim a fast spinning
(close to "C") BH does not wobble. I'm consintrating my thoughts how
wobble is used by nature in both the micro and macro realm,and I'll
keep posting these thoughts more and more. I see a sameness in photon
wave lengths and wobble. I see a sameness in wobbling,and the
vibrations of strings(string theory).



They are giving a simplified account. In real nature, no black hole will
conform to the Schwarzchild solution. both Penrose and Wheeler are fully
aware of this.

See : http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...BlackHole.html


and

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...BlackHole.html


Roy Kerr:

http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/alumni/s...ges/disroy.htm


Regards Llanzlan

Well another reason why a blackhole does not wobble is it has no moving
particles inside its event horizon. Nothing to take its spin off the
center of its axis. The Earth gave me this thought because its spinning
axis does tilt and this creates very noticeable wobble. We have to also
keep in mind its great mass density(as much as a million suns some
times) sees to it that it is not easy to disturb(push around)
Bert