![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Aug 2003 05:45:00 GMT, in a place far, far away, Pat Flannery
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: What's this about no pressure suits? I assumed that donning pressure suits was required under flight rules for reentry And under what realistic failure mode would their having pressure suits on have saved them? -- simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole) interglobal space lines * 307 733-1715 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org "Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..." Swap the first . and @ and throw out the ".trash" to email me. Here's my email address for autospammers: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote in :
I was absolutely flabbergasted to read this on MSN "....Columbia’s crew died within seconds after Mission Control lost signals from the shuttle. “The destruction of the crew module took place over a period of 24 seconds beginning at an altitude of approximately 140,000 feet,” the report said. Death was attributed to blunt trauma and loss of oxygen. A final video from inside the crew compartment, just minutes before the breakup, showed that three crew members were not wearing the pressure suits, gloves and helmets prescribed for re-entry. However, this oversight “did not affect their chances of survival,” the report said..." What's this about no pressure suits? I assumed that donning pressure suits was required under flight rules for reentry... Read it again, but carefully this time, Pat. "...not wearing the pressure suits, gloves AND helmets..." (emphasis mine) While you're at it, you might want to hunt down the cockpit video again. They were all wearing their suits. Looks like they hadn't put their gloves on yet, but the video ends about twelve minutes before the accident. Frankly, if correctly reported, this is the single most disturbing thing I've heard to date regarding the loss of Columbia.... Surely that's a facetious statement. There were plenty of other things in the report that I found far more disturbing than the fact that the crew was slow in donning equipment that wouldn't have saved them anyway. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote:
Pat Flannery wrote in : Frankly, if correctly reported, this is the single most disturbing thing I've heard to date regarding the loss of Columbia.... Surely that's a facetious statement. There were plenty of other things in the report that I found far more disturbing than the fact that the crew was slow in donning equipment that wouldn't have saved them anyway. What we are looking at here Jorge is patterns. Management wasn't following the rules, flight controllers were not either, and now it seems the astronauts as well? This is a very sick system we are looking at here, and the illness runs deeper than just management. D. -- The STS-107 Columbia Loss FAQ can be found at the following URLs: Text-Only Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq.html Enhanced HTML Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html Corrections, comments, and additions should be e-mailed to , as well as posted to sci.space.history and sci.space.shuttle for discussion. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jorge R. Frank wrote: While you're at it, you might want to hunt down the cockpit video again. They were all wearing their suits. Looks like they hadn't put their gloves on yet, but the video ends about twelve minutes before the accident. And they showed the video last night on History Channel...at the point they aren't wearing gloves, the crew is watching the beginning of plasma formation outside the cockpit windows...and as we now know, the wing structure is beginning to be damaged, and pieces are beginning to be shed from the Orbiter. Frankly, if correctly reported, this is the single most disturbing thing I've heard to date regarding the loss of Columbia.... Surely that's a facetious statement. There were plenty of other things in the report that I found far more disturbing than the fact that the crew was slow in donning equipment that wouldn't have saved them anyway. To me though, that slow donning was emblematic of the whole situation that led to the loss of Columbia; a failure to go "by the book" at every phase of the whole operaton....when mission rules state that you should be fully suited up at X minutes before reentry, you should be suited up by that time- not around that time. When mission rules require that the ET has zero shedding of insulation during ascent, that should mean zero shedding....not popcorn sized chunks are acceptable- but suitcase sized ones aren't. Pat |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Doug... wrote: I think the conclusions of the board also reflect the state in which the bodies were recovered. You could probably tell whether or not a crewman was completely suited based on the remains of the body and the suit. Trying to be as delicate as possible about this...some of the bodies were found very far from the crashed cockpit area, and in a badly burned and dismembered state...it is not unusual for passengers falling from an disintegrating airliner at cruising altitude to spin so quickly when they are falling toward the ground that both clothing and limbs are stripped from them be centrifugal force. As for the Apollo 7 debacle, the only reason that particular crew was highly encouraged to wear their PGAs during entry was that they were on the maiden flight of a new spacecraft. IIRC, the only other Apollo crew who entered while suited was the Apollo 15 crew, and that came as a result of the Soyuz 11 accident, which occurred just a month prior to Apollo 15. Dave Scott's crew got to climb into their PGAs for *all* pyro events, including the SIM bay door jett. But, for example, in the Apollo 8 debrief, they talk about how they took off their suits after TLI, stowed them, and never once got them back out for the rest of the flight. Including entry. But wearing pressure suits was one of the (few) safety changes made after Challenger in regards to the crew's survival...and if it's a mission rule, then you should obey it to the letter. Being fully suited up during Columbia's disintegration wouldn't have made an iota of difference in regards to the crew's survival chances...but it would be an extra thing to have in your corner if less severe incidents occurred during reentry; and if it only up's the survival chance by say 5% in regards to such scenarios, then it's worth the bother in my opinion. And it is a mission rule. Pat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Derek Lyons wrote: What we are looking at here Jorge is patterns. Management wasn't following the rules, flight controllers were not either, and now it seems the astronauts as well? This is a very sick system we are looking at here, and the illness runs deeper than just management. What it reminds me of again and again is dirigible flight in the 20's and 30's- only the Germans had any luck with safe long-term operations; as they were the only ones who understood that everything has to be done to a near-perfect standard in all phases of operation; from design, through construction, to maintenance, crew training, and operational safety rules...any error in any of these areas (especially with hydrogen as the lifting agent) would lead to inevitable disaster in routine operations...both the Shuttle and Zeppelins share a basic fragility, that is not fault-tolerant in any phase of their operations. Pat |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rand Simberg wrote: And under what realistic failure mode would their having pressure suits on have saved them? Any loss of crew cabin pressure or contamination of crew cabin atmosphere, and a loss of crew cabin pressure requires only a small hole anywhere in the exterior of the crew cabin, and could reasonably be caused by minor damage that would not in itself lead to vehicle loss (for instance it could occur after the main reentry heating phase while the orbiter was still at very high altitude). Leaking RCS propellants could enter the cabin (just ask the ASTP crew) at low altitudes when interior/exterior pressure equalization occurs- which is why NASA sends out the sniffer truck with the safety suited crew on it before the astronauts leave the orbiter. Also how are you supposed to use the bail-out pole if you aren't fully suited up? If an SR-71 pilot flew a mission sans pressure suit, the Air Force would have court-martialed him; and the Shuttle is exposed to far more severe conditions than a Blackbird's flight during it's reentry....have "mission rules" become "mission suggestions"? Pat |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Herb Schaltegger wrote: I realize of course that none of that made one iota's difference in the ultimate outcome. What exactly are the odds that two people would both use turn of phrase with "iota" in it in regards to the Columbia's loss in such quick succession? (I wrote mine before I read Herb's) This can mean only one thing ...Herb Schaltegger and I are both IDENTICAL CLONES from the same zygote mass that was brought to Earth from Canopus 6! Physically linked by those cybernetic centipedes that live up our noses, as were revealed in the Sci-Fi Channel's "Taken" miniseries (by the Well-Known, Fellow-Traveling, Knee-Jerk, Alien-Hugging Cyborg known as Steven Spielberg!) to the foolishly misled Muto-Monkey Blood-Bags of Sol 3! WELL, the plot- like Venusian Fire Woman Genital Excretions- thickens! And we must now turn our far-more-sensitive-to-infrared-emmisions-than-any- Earth-mammel eyes (all 24 of them) toward Hungary...to see if that Puppet Of The Pleiadins, Tamas Feher, has yet received the subspace hyperlight activator signal from his Pleone-worshipping masters, and will wind up that Atlantian artifact that he has mistaken for an ancient Greek alarm clock (in his Terracentric foolishness)...releasing ZOOGY- the Dog Of A Thousand Leashes- from his submerged crypt under the Isle Of Santorini, to once again play havoc with the Earth's dimensions; and call all of the Secret Tibetan Dog-Masters into Grand Convocation on the slopes of Vesuvius; from there to lead the Spartacus-like uprising of all the Canis-Not-Now-So-Domesticus in the world against their masters, thereby returning the Earth to the wretched control of ELLEN BARKUS- High Priestess Of The Dog Star! And after that...things are going to get really interesting, as Homo Sap gets his at the end of a rolled up copy of the Siriusan Human Lover magazine...before his nose is unceremoniously rubbed in the mess he's made of history, and he has to spend the night in the humanhouse, before heading for the humanarian- and his well-deserved neutering, on the morrow. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|