![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have read some posts that imply "sidewalk astronomy". Charging for "a
look" is NUTS! Who in their right mind would involk a price to "have a look" at the sky? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Hawk" wrote in message
news:7G9Cc.1602$933.592@clgrps12... I have read some posts that imply "sidewalk astronomy". Charging for "a look" is NUTS! Who in their right mind would involk a price to "have a look" at the sky? I've often thought we would actually get more traffic if we were charging. :-) People seem to value things more when they pay something for them. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Hawk" wrote in message
news:7G9Cc.1602$933.592@clgrps12... I have read some posts that imply "sidewalk astronomy". Charging for "a look" is NUTS! Who in their right mind would involk a price to "have a look" at the sky? I've often thought we would actually get more traffic if we were charging. :-) People seem to value things more when they pay something for them. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Hawk" wrote in message news:7G9Cc.1602$933.592@clgrps12...
I have read some posts that imply "sidewalk astronomy". Charging for "a look" is NUTS! Who in their right mind would involk a price to "have a look" at the sky? Someone who wants to get paid for their time? It's not much mind; I once worked out that I make an average of $8/hour. Wow. But fortunately, I am retired and it supplements my pension. I also enjoy being out with the sky and with people. And you'd have to enjoy it, for a measly $8/hour. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Hawk" wrote in message news:7G9Cc.1602$933.592@clgrps12...
I have read some posts that imply "sidewalk astronomy". Charging for "a look" is NUTS! Who in their right mind would involk a price to "have a look" at the sky? Someone who wants to get paid for their time? It's not much mind; I once worked out that I make an average of $8/hour. Wow. But fortunately, I am retired and it supplements my pension. I also enjoy being out with the sky and with people. And you'd have to enjoy it, for a measly $8/hour. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proof that 2 and only 2 methods for landing on Mars and astro bodies | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 18 | January 12th 04 09:40 AM |
Canon A70 instead? (was Canon S400 ok for astro?) | Alan Charlesworth | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | October 28th 03 02:30 PM |
Any books on "Astro" Cartography? (I'm not a crank) | Adrian B. | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | August 1st 03 10:02 AM |