![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi folks,
I'm currently cutting up a circular cardboard box in order to build a solar filter for the upcoming Venus transit. The question is: should I go for an off-center design (which apparently improves image quality) or should I go for maximum aperture, i.e. cut a complete ring around the center SCT mirror obstruction? If I decide to go for the off-center design, does the hole need to be exactly circular or can it be elliptical in order to gather some more light? I've measured the "business end" of the SPC-8 and it looks like 7,5cm would be the perfect radius for an off-axis design. Thanks much in advance for your thoughts and comments, uwe -- mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox) Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/ Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E) GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uwe Schürkamp wrote:
Hi folks, I'm currently cutting up a circular cardboard box in order to build a solar filter for the upcoming Venus transit. The question is: should I go for an off-center design (which apparently improves image quality) or should I go for maximum aperture, i.e. cut a complete ring around the center SCT mirror obstruction? If I decide to go for the off-center design, does the hole need to be exactly circular or can it be elliptical in order to gather some more light? I've measured the "business end" of the SPC-8 and it looks like 7,5cm would be the perfect radius for an off-axis design. Thanks much in advance for your thoughts and comments, uwe I don't see why an off center design would improve image quality? I.e. since when did smaller telescope produce superior images over bigger telescopes? I have a full aperture solar filter for my C8. Clear skies Carsten A. Arnholm http://arnholm.org/ N59.776 E10.457 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uwe Schürkamp wrote:
Hi folks, I'm currently cutting up a circular cardboard box in order to build a solar filter for the upcoming Venus transit. The question is: should I go for an off-center design (which apparently improves image quality) or should I go for maximum aperture, i.e. cut a complete ring around the center SCT mirror obstruction? If I decide to go for the off-center design, does the hole need to be exactly circular or can it be elliptical in order to gather some more light? I've measured the "business end" of the SPC-8 and it looks like 7,5cm would be the perfect radius for an off-axis design. Thanks much in advance for your thoughts and comments, uwe I don't see why an off center design would improve image quality? I.e. since when did smaller telescope produce superior images over bigger telescopes? I have a full aperture solar filter for my C8. Clear skies Carsten A. Arnholm http://arnholm.org/ N59.776 E10.457 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 May 2004 00:35:01 +0200, Carsten A. Arnholm wrote:
I don't see why an off center design would improve image quality? I.e. since when did smaller telescope produce superior images over bigger telescopes? I have a full aperture solar filter for my C8. Hi Carsten, thanks for your reply. I don't understand either, but it was mentioned in the brochure that came with the SkySolar filter I bought from the german company Baader Planetarium, so I thought I'd make sure and ask here first before I start cutting up that precious item ;-) Cheers & thanks again, uwe -- mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox) Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/ Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E) GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 May 2004 00:35:01 +0200, Carsten A. Arnholm wrote:
I don't see why an off center design would improve image quality? I.e. since when did smaller telescope produce superior images over bigger telescopes? I have a full aperture solar filter for my C8. Hi Carsten, thanks for your reply. I don't understand either, but it was mentioned in the brochure that came with the SkySolar filter I bought from the german company Baader Planetarium, so I thought I'd make sure and ask here first before I start cutting up that precious item ;-) Cheers & thanks again, uwe -- mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox) Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/ Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E) GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
Scientists Report First-Ever 3D Observations of Solar Storms Using Ulysses Spacecraft | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 17th 03 03:28 AM |
Scientists report first-ever 3-D observations of solar storms usingUlysses spacecraft (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 17th 03 01:46 AM |
Voyager Spacecraft Approaching Solar System's Final Frontier | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 5th 03 06:56 PM |
Voyager Spacecraft Approaching Solar System's Final Frontier | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 5th 03 06:56 PM |