![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David W. Cantrell wrote in message
... wrote: Is there a equation for the thearetical great-circle radius of a ellipsoid? I understand that a ellipsoid won't have a single radius but is there any "best-fit" spherical avarage known? There may be several known. According to precisely which criterion do you want the "best-fit"? A similar but simpler question might be asked about an ellipse, having semiaxes lengths a and b. Two "average radii" include the arithmetic mean, (a + b)/2 and the root-mean-square, Sqrt((a^2 + b^2)/2). Not quite, those are *approximations* for both the "Gaussian Mean Radius" and "Rectified Radius" (i.e., north-south, meridional arcradius). The approximation--if not THE true equation--for the "best fit", "spherical great circle" mean arcradius would be: 1 a^2 + b^2 Gr = [- * (a^2 + ---------)]^.5 = [.25 * (3*a^2 + b^2)]^.5 2 2 I.e., the equator, itself, which equals "a", is half of the average! See my main reply to this thread. BTW, are *ALL* "ellipsoids of revolution" spheroids, or just ones that are "nearly spherical"?. E.g., if a = 10000 and b = 2000, would that be considered a spheroid? If not, what is the minimum ratio required? ~Kaimbridge~ ----- Wanted—Kaimbridge (w/mugshot!): http://www.angelfire.com/ma2/digitol...nted_KMGC.html ---------- Digitology—The Grand Theory Of The Universe: http://www.angelfire.com/ma2/digitology/index.html ***** Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer. ***** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David W. Cantrell wrote in message ...
(Kaimbridge) wrote: David W. Cantrell wrote in message ... wrote: Is there a equation for the thearetical great-circle radius of a ellipsoid? I understand that a ellipsoid won't have a single radius but is there any "best-fit" spherical avarage known? There may be several known. According to precisely which criterion do you want the "best-fit"? A similar but simpler question might be asked about an ellipse, having semiaxes lengths a and b. Two "average radii" include the arithmetic mean, (a + b)/2 and the root-mean-square, Sqrt((a^2 + b^2)/2). Not quite, No, quite. I merely said that they were two "average radii". They are. I made no claims that they were equal to some quantities which you seem to have in mind. those are *approximations* for both the "Gaussian Mean Radius" and "Rectified Radius" (i.e., north-south, meridional arcradius). You seem to be talking about a (3-D) spheroid now. I was, as I had clearly specified, just talking about an ellipse. Right, okay, but even for an ellipse, the "average/mean radii" of that ellipse equals "a" times the divided difference of the complete elliptic integral of the second kind, wouldn't you agree? Yes, .5 * [a + b] and [.5 * (a^2 + b^2)]^.5 are averages of "a" and "b", but not of the WHOLE ELLIPSE--and the OP seems interested in the whole great ellipse average. So, as I said, it would seem, The approximation--if not THE true equation--for the "best fit", "spherical great circle" mean arcradius would be: 1 a^2 + b^2 Gr = [- * (a^2 + ---------)]^.5 = [.25 * (3*a^2 + b^2)]^.5 2 2 I.e., the equator, itself, which equals "a", is half of the average! ~Kaimbridge~ ----- Wanted—Kaimbridge (w/mugshot!): http://www.angelfire.com/ma2/digitol...nted_KMGC.html ---------- Digitology—The Grand Theory Of The Universe: http://www.angelfire.com/ma2/digitology/index.html ***** Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer. ***** |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Kaimbridge) wrote:
David W. Cantrell wrote in message ... (Kaimbridge) wrote: David W. Cantrell wrote in message ... wrote: Is there a equation for the thearetical great-circle radius of a ellipsoid? I understand that a ellipsoid won't have a single radius but is there any "best-fit" spherical avarage known? There may be several known. According to precisely which criterion do you want the "best-fit"? A similar but simpler question might be asked about an ellipse, having semiaxes lengths a and b. Two "average radii" include the arithmetic mean, (a + b)/2 and the root-mean-square, Sqrt((a^2 + b^2)/2). Not quite, No, quite. I merely said that they were two "average radii". They are. I made no claims that they were equal to some quantities which you seem to have in mind. those are *approximations* for both the "Gaussian Mean Radius" and "Rectified Radius" (i.e., north-south, meridional arcradius). You seem to be talking about a (3-D) spheroid now. I was, as I had clearly specified, just talking about an ellipse. Right, okay, but even for an ellipse, the "average/mean radii" of that ellipse equals "a" times the divided difference of the complete elliptic integral of the second kind, wouldn't you agree? No. There is no unique thing which should be called _the_ mean radius of an ellipse. There are many different means. Yes, there is _a_ mean radius which would be defined in terms of a complete elliptic integral of the second kind. DWC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hans Moravec's Original Rotovator Paper | James Bowery | Policy | 0 | July 6th 04 07:45 AM |
Great-circle radius of ellipsoid | Kaimbridge | Astronomy Misc | 4 | May 21st 04 07:52 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |