![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All other things being equal (seeing, tracking, CCD response etc),
would there be any difference between an image derived from a 10 minute exposure through a narrowband filter (e.g. HII or OIII) and one derived from a 20 minute exposure through two stacked filters of the same type? I ask because I wondered if stacking narrowband filters could improve contrast between blocked and bandpassed wavelengths with the only downside being longer exposure times needed. As I only have one of each flavour - I can't test it. Cheers Beats |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Older Lumicon Filter Question | Alan French | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | February 14th 04 07:21 PM |
Filter for observing moon? | Andrew Goldish | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | November 9th 03 06:27 PM |
Filter Holder | Roger | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:14 PM |
H-beta or 0-lll filter | Jon | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | September 30th 03 10:09 PM |
Meade series 4000 wratten color filter sets- are they parfocal? | Jacob Jackson | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 27th 03 09:55 PM |