![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I bought a photo-visual Paracorr last year on Astromart as an accessory for my f4.5 13" dob. I assumed that I would not be getting a 31mm Nagler anytime soon, so this seemed like a good choice. Well, a 31mm Nagler will be landing in my EP case shortly thanks to my brother. Is the difference great enough between the photo-visual and visual-only models to make a noticeable difference when observing with the 31mm? Is it upgrade time again...? Thanks for any and all input, - Craig Craig Levine Observing Chairman RASC, Halifax Centre www.halifax.rasc.ca |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the difference great enough between the photo-visual and
visual-only models to make a noticeable difference when observing with the 31mm Hi... I'm not certain what you mean when you say a "photo-visual" version of the ParaCorr, but I'm assuming you just mean the non-adjustable model. The 31mm Nagler works best when the 'tunatable' top is at its' innermost position. If, in the version you have, the distance between the field lens of the eyepiece and the lens of the ParaCorr is longer than this minimum distance you will not be getting the maximum performance from the 31mm. Mike Harvey |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Feb 2004 18:40:06 GMT, (MHarveyWW1) wrote:
I'm not certain what you mean when you say a "photo-visual" version of the ParaCorr, but I'm assuming you just mean the non-adjustable model. The 31mm Nagler works best when the 'tunatable' top is at its' innermost position. If, in the version you have, the distance between the field lens of the eyepiece and the lens of the ParaCorr is longer than this minimum distance you will not be getting the maximum performance from the 31mm. Mike Harvey Hi Mike, There are two versions of the Paracorr. The one that I have has T- threads for attaching a standard 35mm Camera. The optional items available are the tunable top and 2" to 1.25 adapter which convert the photographic Paracorr into a Visual Paracorr. The other version is the "Visual Only", which is a complete unit with a larger field lens and no T-threads. That model was designed for those with a Nagler 31mm, as apparently some vignetting can be seen with the 31mm in the Photo-Visual model. The heart of my cocern is, how noticeable is the vignetting, and is it bad enough that I should get the visual-only model, or is it subtle enough to let me use trhe model that I have. Cheers, - Craig Craig Levine Observing Chairman RASC, Halifax Centre www.halifax.rasc.ca |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Mike, There are two versions of the Paracorr. The one that I have has T- threads for attaching a standard 35mm Camera. The optional items available are the tunable top and 2" to 1.25 adapter which convert the photographic Paracorr into a Visual Paracorr. The other version is the "Visual Only", which is a complete unit with a larger field lens and no T-threads. That model was designed for those with a Nagler 31mm, as apparently some vignetting can be seen with the 31mm in the Photo-Visual model. The heart of my cocern is, how noticeable is the vignetting, and is it bad enough that I should get the visual-only model, or is it subtle enough to let me use trhe model that I have. Cheers, - Craig Craig Levine *********************** I have the older version Paracorr, and i never noticed any vignetting, with my 31mm Nag! But then again i never looked for vignetting. But i will try it out next time i get the scope out... Chas P. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are two versions of the Paracorr.
Hello, again... yes, I know there are two versions, but I've never heard the non-tunable-top referred to as the 'photo-visual' model. I think we're talking about the same thing, though. When I first purchased the 31mm Nagler I still had the 'original' (non-tunable) ParaCorr. It seemed to work just fine. THEN, Al Nagler suggested I try the tunable-top with the eyepiece and, voila'... suddenly I realized I had not been getting the full effect! Is the difference enough to warrant buying a new ParaCorr? I thought so. Mike Harvey |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Craig Levine wrote: There are two versions of the Paracorr. The one that I have has T- threads for attaching a standard 35mm Camera. The optional items available are the tunable top and 2" to 1.25 adapter which convert the photographic Paracorr into a Visual Paracorr. The other version is the "Visual Only", which is a complete unit with a larger field lens and no T-threads. That model was designed for those with a Nagler 31mm, as apparently some vignetting can be seen with the 31mm in the Photo-Visual model. The heart of my cocern is, how noticeable is the vignetting, and is it bad enough that I should get the visual-only model, or is it subtle enough to let me use trhe model that I have. Craig, Why don't you go to TeleVue's website and ask them your questions. You're sure to get the straight poop there- free and accurate advice about their products. Starry Skies, Rich |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:20:42 GMT, Craig Levine
wrote: There are two versions of the Paracorr. The one that I have has T- threads for attaching a standard 35mm Camera. The optional items available are the tunable top and 2" to 1.25 adapter which convert the photographic Paracorr into a Visual Paracorr. The other version is the "Visual Only", which is a complete unit with a larger field lens and no T-threads. That model was designed for those with a Nagler 31mm, as apparently some vignetting can be seen with the 31mm in the Photo-Visual model. The heart of my cocern is, how noticeable is the vignetting, and is it bad enough that I should get the visual-only model, or is it subtle enough to let me use trhe model that I have. Counting the original "non tunable top" model, there are actually 3 different Paracorrs in general use right now. Both the current "photo/visual" and "visual only" models have the same tunable top, and a tunable top can even be purchased separately and screwed onto the old original model (after the original "solid top" section is first threaded off), making it identical to the current photo/visual model. I believe the photo/visual model has a "free aperture" of about 35mm or 36mm (just enough to use the 35mm Panoptic without vignetting), and the visual only model is right at 42mm of free aperture (matching the 42mm field stop of the 31mm Nagler). The "visual only" Paracorr will still vignette the truly widest field 2" eyepieces with their 44mm to 46mm field stops. I once owned a (now very rare, quite hard to find, and expensive) 1.25" Paracorr, but in a weak moment I sold it, and I have kicked myself for doing so ever sense. Lawrence Sayre -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a moral being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute. Ayn Rand (in the appendix to 'Atlas Shrugged') ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have the older version Paracorr, and i never noticed any vignetting, with my 31mm Nag! But then again i never looked for vignetting. But i will try it out next time i get the scope out... Chas P. Thanks Chas. Let me know what you see. I'll have my 31/Paracorr combo out as soon as possible after the 31 arrives. Cheers, - Craig |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1.25" Paracorr Questions | Dave | Amateur Astronomy | 23 | October 31st 03 01:17 AM |
31mm Nagler vs. 4mm Tasco Huygens | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | August 2nd 03 07:08 PM |
41mm Panoptic vs. 31mm Nagler | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 1st 03 10:14 PM |