![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm considering this scope off Astromart, for sale by someone within easy
driving distance. He's asking $750, which seems a little high for a scope that sells on Astronomics for $845 + $79 in shipping. I'll save some bucks on the price and not have to pay shipping, so it's a savings nonetheless. Scope is allegedly 8 months old. Are the mirrors in the Meade 12.5" generally pretty good? I'm sure that the mount will need some TLC and eventually I might build/buy a truss structure for it, but I've learned how to doctor the cheap structures to work acceptably well. I've also considered the GS 12" F5 which is "pretty close" in price. What say you? Should I expect the Meade mirror to be better than/same as the GS? -Steve Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Troll, PLONK
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Troll, PLONK
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Are the mirrors in the Meade 12.5" generally pretty good? I Hi: Amazingly good, actually. When I bought one back in 1994 I was expecting something similar to the Coulter Odyssey I. Nope. One look at Jupiter with the Meade and I was blown away. Yes, you will have to do some work to optimize the scope. The most important thing is replacing the nylon azimuth and altitude bearing pads with Teflon. Magic Sliders work fine. The plastic focuser is also a candidate for early replacement--though the 1.25" version is useable...the 2" is pretty horrible. Some also shipped with 30mm finders...you'll certainly want to replace one of these with a 50mm finder and/or Telrad. Finally, you'll probably want to rig a simple balance weight system of some kind. As most folks know, I ain't exactly a dob kinda guy, but I have very fond memories of my Meade 12.5. OTOH, I've heard some very good things about the GS. If you like dobs, I don't think you can go wrong either way...though the GS probably will require considerably less fine tuning. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Are the mirrors in the Meade 12.5" generally pretty good? I Hi: Amazingly good, actually. When I bought one back in 1994 I was expecting something similar to the Coulter Odyssey I. Nope. One look at Jupiter with the Meade and I was blown away. Yes, you will have to do some work to optimize the scope. The most important thing is replacing the nylon azimuth and altitude bearing pads with Teflon. Magic Sliders work fine. The plastic focuser is also a candidate for early replacement--though the 1.25" version is useable...the 2" is pretty horrible. Some also shipped with 30mm finders...you'll certainly want to replace one of these with a 50mm finder and/or Telrad. Finally, you'll probably want to rig a simple balance weight system of some kind. As most folks know, I ain't exactly a dob kinda guy, but I have very fond memories of my Meade 12.5. OTOH, I've heard some very good things about the GS. If you like dobs, I don't think you can go wrong either way...though the GS probably will require considerably less fine tuning. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Stephen Paul wrote: Are the mirrors in the Meade 12.5" generally pretty good? The mirror on my Meade 12.5" Starfinder is really very nice. Pretty much identical diffraction patterns both inside and outside of focus when star testing and additionally the mirror shows little sign of zonal error using the same testing technique. I just came in the house after taking a quick, late dusk glimpse at Saturn and found that Encke's Division was easy and sustained. It was very discernable with a 7.5mm Sirius plossl and optimally presented itself when the scope was coupled with a 6mm Orion Expanse. I would say go ahead and get the scope. It will bring you much joy. Martin Remove "ilikestars" from email address |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Stephen Paul wrote: Are the mirrors in the Meade 12.5" generally pretty good? The mirror on my Meade 12.5" Starfinder is really very nice. Pretty much identical diffraction patterns both inside and outside of focus when star testing and additionally the mirror shows little sign of zonal error using the same testing technique. I just came in the house after taking a quick, late dusk glimpse at Saturn and found that Encke's Division was easy and sustained. It was very discernable with a 7.5mm Sirius plossl and optimally presented itself when the scope was coupled with a 6mm Orion Expanse. I would say go ahead and get the scope. It will bring you much joy. Martin Remove "ilikestars" from email address |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw the same ad Stephen. I defer to Rod's advice, agree. If this one
however I would offer a bit less and make it worth your while. The optics and these have a good rep however. If you get this I would turn right around and advertise for a Meade 2" R&P with adapter - perfect for this scope. I found one last year for $50 mint. Good luck - jerry Stephen Paul wrote: I'm considering this scope off Astromart, for sale by someone within easy driving distance. He's asking $750, which seems a little high for a scope that sells on Astronomics for $845 + $79 in shipping. I'll save some bucks on the price and not have to pay shipping, so it's a savings nonetheless. Scope is allegedly 8 months old. Are the mirrors in the Meade 12.5" generally pretty good? I'm sure that the mount will need some TLC and eventually I might build/buy a truss structure for it, but I've learned how to doctor the cheap structures to work acceptably well. I've also considered the GS 12" F5 which is "pretty close" in price. What say you? Should I expect the Meade mirror to be better than/same as the GS? -Steve Paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw the same ad Stephen. I defer to Rod's advice, agree. If this one
however I would offer a bit less and make it worth your while. The optics and these have a good rep however. If you get this I would turn right around and advertise for a Meade 2" R&P with adapter - perfect for this scope. I found one last year for $50 mint. Good luck - jerry Stephen Paul wrote: I'm considering this scope off Astromart, for sale by someone within easy driving distance. He's asking $750, which seems a little high for a scope that sells on Astronomics for $845 + $79 in shipping. I'll save some bucks on the price and not have to pay shipping, so it's a savings nonetheless. Scope is allegedly 8 months old. Are the mirrors in the Meade 12.5" generally pretty good? I'm sure that the mount will need some TLC and eventually I might build/buy a truss structure for it, but I've learned how to doctor the cheap structures to work acceptably well. I've also considered the GS 12" F5 which is "pretty close" in price. What say you? Should I expect the Meade mirror to be better than/same as the GS? -Steve Paul |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would turn right around
and advertise for a Meade 2" R&P with adapter - perfect for this scope. I HI Jerry: I concur. This one is about the same height as the plastic one included with the scope, right? Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meade to stop selling the 12.5 and 16" starfinders Dobs | Rich McMahon | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | February 18th 04 09:04 PM |
Meade 12.5 inch dobsonian reflector? | Neil A. | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | November 22nd 03 05:25 AM |
Meade LXD55 SN10 vs the Meade Starfinder 12.5" | Dave | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 30th 03 10:46 PM |
Meade LXD55 (10") or Meade Starfinder (12.5") ?? | Paige Turner | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | August 13th 03 02:52 AM |