![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From a variety of Surplus shed parts, and some home depot trips, I've
managed to cobble together a little 80mm f/5 scope. As with any first time project, when I put it under the stars, I had some issues. The first one was my culmination was awful. I made some changes, and made the culmination adjustable, and now I have nice circular stars (for the center stars) when I go unfocused on either side of focus. What I have now figured out, is that I have some very serious coma, all those nice seagulls are pretty far from the water when I'm looking through the scope. My question to any takers out there, what is the best approach for correcting coma? You can assume that all the mechanical parts are adjustable for me. Also, I was expecting to see the violet fringing around bright objects. What I was not expecting was a green fringe!?! Have I messed something up, or are my focal planes off, or, is my objective worth what I paid for it? Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks, Ed L. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks, Ed L. Sounds like an interesting project, hope you get it sorted out. Makes you believe in those inexpensive Chinese scopes a bit more... Coma=collimation.... jon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed L." wrote in message news:zhA_b.111399$jk2.496927@attbi_s53...
From a variety of Surplus shed parts, and some home depot trips, I've managed to cobble together a little 80mm f/5 scope. As with any first time project, when I put it under the stars, I had some issues. The first one was my culmination was awful. I made some changes, and made the culmination adjustable, and now I have nice circular stars (for the center stars) when I go unfocused on either side of focus. What I have now figured out, is that I have some very serious coma, all those nice seagulls are pretty far from the water when I'm looking through the scope. My question to any takers out there, what is the best approach for correcting coma? You can assume that all the mechanical parts are adjustable for me. Also, I was expecting to see the violet fringing around bright objects. What I was not expecting was a green fringe!?! Have I messed something up, or are my focal planes off, or, is my objective worth what I paid for it? Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks, Ed L. Sorry if this reply is too late, but I am posting through Google. It sounds like you built the same scope I did. It works great as a spotting scope, but I have noticed the same coma problem with it. Lenses are spherical and will tend to have a pronounced coma with fast scopes like an f/5. And I think that this lens in particular is not well corrected, but hey, you get what you pay for. I have found that using a 3x Barlow helps somewhat, simply by increasing the focal length. They make coma-correcting lenses, which are very thin and almost flat, but I think they tend to be pricey. Not sure if this would work, but you might try masking the outer edge of the lens (or should it be a center dot?). Of course you will lose some aperture that way. Good luck and let me know if you get it corrected, James King |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light pollution. Was: Exterior House Lighting | N9WOS | Amateur Astronomy | 26 | February 10th 04 04:03 AM |
Bands of Saturn. How many of them can be counted (really!) with 7" scope? | ValeryD | Amateur Astronomy | 294 | January 26th 04 08:18 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |