![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"A QUANTUM BOMB"
by: netcrazy A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all dimensions around us and is a infinite chain reaction every opposing reaction has an unseen opposite reaction ( refraction )of light. Wave Length - Gravity - Light - mass - Wave Lengths.( THEY ARE ALL INTERCHANGEABLE )" Over the past century, physicists have unlocked the secrets behind radio and television, nuclear energy and the power of the sun. Now they're seeking the ultimate prize: a "theory of everything" that could reveal a bizarre realm of inter dimensional wormholes and time warps. SUCH A THEORY would give us the ability to "read the mind of God," says Cambridge cosmologist Stephen Hawking. And in Hawking's opinion, there's a 50-50 chance that someone will discover the Holy Grail of physics within the next 20 years. Beginning in the 1920s, a generation of scientists defined the small scale universe as a collection of fuzzy phantoms. These subatomic particles couldn't be precisely located in space and time, but their interaction could be described in statistical terms.The equations that describe the gravitational field are completely different from those for electromagnetism and subatomic interactions. But one bizarre approach is gaining popularity. It turns out that the equations of quantum theory can mesh perfectly with the theory of relativity. Now in the 2003 we know the quantum address of all matter in our quantum tunnel. This article is based on material from "Hyper space" and "Visions" by Michio Kaku. 12-01-03 by tim liverance He apparently emailed this to Art bell and Art read it on the air to Kaku last night and Kaku said it was stupid. "That doesn't make any sense," he said; when Art pressed him further, Kaku said "It's in defiance of the laws of physics." I was actually quite impressed by Kaku on last night's show. When he sticks to actual physics and the history of same, he seems quite intelligent. He had some interesting things to say about nuclear reactor accidents and how they happened. According to the physicists in the USA and Austria who have come up with a new, improved solution to this dastardly challenge of probing without interacting, the answer is 'yes'. The 'superbomb' conundrum above was posed in 1993, by physicists A. Elitzur and L. Vaidman, to illustrate the problem of 'interaction-free' measurements. It is a restatement of the old quantum-theory chestnut: the observer and the observed are inextricably linked. Elitzur and Vaidman proposed that, far from foiling attempts at interaction-free measurement, quantum theory makes them possible. Conventional thinking says that, if you want to inspect the bombs, there's no option but to bounce at least one photon off them. Yet according to quantum theory, because light is both wave and particle, a photon can have a ghostly influence on itself. A beam of light that is split in two and then recombined by a system of mirrors will generate interference effects - even if only one photon passes through the apparatus at a time. Elitzur and Vaidman showed that, because of this 'self-interference', a primed superbomb could be detected with a one in two chance even without the photon actually striking it. This is all very well as far as it goes - but the option of being blown up in half of the measurements is none too attractive. Now Paul Kwiat from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, and colleagues, have improved the odds from one in two to almost one in four. As they explain in Physical Review Letters(1) they have improved on Elitzur and Vaidman's solution, with the help of another strange quantum-mechanical effect: the 'quantum Zeno effect'. This trick is named after Zeno, the Greek philosopher of the fourth century BC renowned for his relish of paradoxes. His take on the 'measurement problem' has entered folklore as the adage that 'a watched pot never boils'. In the quantum world, this can acquire some truth: in some situations, repeated measurements made on a quantum system can prevent it from changing its state. This is the quantum Zeno effect. It operates even if the interaction between the probe and the system is extremely weak. The interaction can then be inferred from the invariance of the system. The effect holds even in the case of vanishingly small interaction strengths, if the measurements are made often enough. Now, Kwiat and colleagues report that, with just six such measurements, a single photon of laser light could detect a particular quantum system two times out of three without being absorbed. By combining Elitzur and Vaidman's beam-splitting arrangement with an arrangement of polarizing filters to bring about the quantum Zeno effect, the researchers figured that they could, in principle, make interaction-free measurements as reliably as they liked. In practice, the limited number of repeat measurements in their set-up gave them a hypothetical probability of interaction-free detection of 85 per cent. Experimentally, the efficiency was a little less - about 74 per cent, or three out of four - because of losses in the light signal within the apparatus. But the researchers claim that increasing the number of sequential measurements to 100 would increase the practical efficiency to more than 93 per cent. So there is hope yet for the quantum detective. (1) References Kwiat, P. G., White, A. G., Mitchell, J. R., Nairz, O., Weihs, G., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. High-Efficiency Quantum Interrogation Measurements via the Quantum Zeno Effect Physical Review Letters 83, 4725 - 4728 1999.| Homepage: http://prl.aps.org/ | © Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2003 Post a follow-up to this message Art Bell http://www.coasttocoastam.com/ Advance Technology Mark and x advance technology then bring it back in time to the x give it to the researchers and then go to the future and do the same thing and come back and make Tim liverance smarter from birth and find out what he invented. the core mind stays the same he would have be interested in the same things. they just think killing his brain would stop it this time but again look above he still loves quantum physics. advance technology beyond area 51 Build a quantum lab and mark off area X develop future theory technology give it a project number and pass it on and on so in the future we can quantum leap technology back in time. two lab area x. build a quantum reinstatement area. fiber optic cable on a super computer.. or find out where i went @ 1-11-2001 or 1-11-2002 @ 11:30 - 12:00 metaphysical 64 bit processor run like 100 million zeta hz Data encryption 360 degrees rotation document 90 degrees and encryption on every angel then change it two binary code and fold it over like a piece of paper then having the one's and zero cancel each other out. if you written a very long letter and then change it two binary code it would look like this 01010101010101010101010 10010101010101010101010 01010101001010101010010 00010101000101010101010 10010101010100101010101 01010101010100001100101 01001010101010101010111 11110111001101010101010 01010101010101010101010 10101010101010101010101 if you took the piece of paper and folded it and folded it and folded it the 0 and 1 would cancel each out and if you keep folding the piece of paper too the smallest you would have 4 numbers left 1001 now if the key new the folding times you could send 4 bytes over the internet and unzip a 100 zetabyte program you computer could store all the programs ever written but just need the key to unzip then you could us this for SETI for signals or can you imagine a computer processor that would be 1.8 Hz but run like 100 million zeta hz you could use the new 64 bit process second side to unzip while the front side processes. or use this for the matrix or quantum computing or supercomputer. 64 bit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quantum of Work | Hossein Javadi | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 21st 04 07:05 AM |
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all | Roger Wilco | Policy | 0 | December 17th 03 11:38 PM |
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all dimensions | Roger Wilco | Space Station | 0 | December 16th 03 02:29 AM |
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all dimensions | Roger Wilco | Policy | 0 | December 16th 03 02:28 AM |