A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » SETI
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"They aren't who you think", by Steven J. Dick ...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 5th 03, 12:50 AM
Alfred A. Aburto Jr.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "They aren't who you think", by Steven J. Dick ...

Steven J. Dick, an astronomer at NRL, has published an interesting article
in the Nov/Dec issue of Mercury magazine (publication of the Astronomical
Society of the Pacific, www.astrosociety.org): "They aren't who you think".
The article was first given at the SETI Leagues SETICon conference in 2002.

He says: "If we ever encounter extraterrestrial intelligence, they're likely
to be machines, not creatures of flesh and blood". He says we need to think
in "Stapledonian" time frames (after Olaf Stapledon and his books, "Last and
First Men"(1930), "Star Maker" (1937)), meaning billions of years where
cultural evolution might take place. He thinks we may live in a
"postbiological" universe, one that has evolved beyond "flesh & blood" to
artificial intelligence.

I wonder though, aren't we machines? Aren't we some construct of nature, or
....? Maybe ETI or AI has already been here billions of years ago and we are
the result (one answer to the Fermi question I guess). Why would AI be so
different from us in ways of thinking or behavior?
Al



  #2  
Old November 5th 03, 08:05 AM
Anthony Cerrato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "They aren't who you think", by Steven J. Dick ...


"Alfred A. Aburto Jr." wrote in
message
. com...
Steven J. Dick, an astronomer at NRL, has published an

interesting article
in the Nov/Dec issue of Mercury magazine (publication of

the Astronomical
Society of the Pacific, www.astrosociety.org): "They

aren't who you think".
The article was first given at the SETI Leagues SETICon

conference in 2002.

He says: "If we ever encounter extraterrestrial

intelligence, they're likely
to be machines, not creatures of flesh and blood". He says

we need to think
in "Stapledonian" time frames (after Olaf Stapledon and

his books, "Last and
First Men"(1930), "Star Maker" (1937)), meaning billions

of years where
cultural evolution might take place. He thinks we may live

in a
"postbiological" universe, one that has evolved beyond

"flesh & blood" to
artificial intelligence.

I wonder though, aren't we machines? Aren't we some

construct of nature, or
...? Maybe ETI or AI has already been here billions of

years ago and we are
the result (one answer to the Fermi question I guess). Why

would AI be so
different from us in ways of thinking or behavior?
Al


That's a very good point Al! We are really no different than
complex machines--organic ones of course, but still
machines. Could we be the engineered exploration probes,
mass produced by an earlier vanguard of alien-built AIs (or
scouts of the aliens themselves) in order to perform
eventual long-term exploration of the universe while the
aliens comfortably hide somewhere, safe and sound from the
dangers out there? 'Tis possible. ...tonyC


  #3  
Old November 5th 03, 08:05 AM
Anthony Cerrato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "They aren't who you think", by Steven J. Dick ...


"Alfred A. Aburto Jr." wrote in
message
. com...
Steven J. Dick, an astronomer at NRL, has published an

interesting article
in the Nov/Dec issue of Mercury magazine (publication of

the Astronomical
Society of the Pacific, www.astrosociety.org): "They

aren't who you think".
The article was first given at the SETI Leagues SETICon

conference in 2002.

He says: "If we ever encounter extraterrestrial

intelligence, they're likely
to be machines, not creatures of flesh and blood". He says

we need to think
in "Stapledonian" time frames (after Olaf Stapledon and

his books, "Last and
First Men"(1930), "Star Maker" (1937)), meaning billions

of years where
cultural evolution might take place. He thinks we may live

in a
"postbiological" universe, one that has evolved beyond

"flesh & blood" to
artificial intelligence.

I wonder though, aren't we machines? Aren't we some

construct of nature, or
...? Maybe ETI or AI has already been here billions of

years ago and we are
the result (one answer to the Fermi question I guess). Why

would AI be so
different from us in ways of thinking or behavior?
Al


That's a very good point Al! We are really no different than
complex machines--organic ones of course, but still
machines. Could we be the engineered exploration probes,
mass produced by an earlier vanguard of alien-built AIs (or
scouts of the aliens themselves) in order to perform
eventual long-term exploration of the universe while the
aliens comfortably hide somewhere, safe and sound from the
dangers out there? 'Tis possible. ...tonyC


  #4  
Old November 5th 03, 09:34 AM
Matt Giwer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "They aren't who you think", by Steven J. Dick ...

Alfred A. Aburto Jr. wrote:

I wonder though, aren't we machines? Aren't we some construct of nature, or
....? Maybe ETI or AI has already been here billions of years ago and we are
the result (one answer to the Fermi question I guess). Why would AI be so
different from us in ways of thinking or behavior?


Or we are inorganic machines experiencing a rather complex but wholely fantastic creation
of BQ7r9 the avant garde game maker. But like the French movies in this reality game the
entire experience seems rather pointless. Two manipulators down for Earth to the Stars II.
It is a very poor sequal.

--
It is not clear why Bush sent his dogs to attack Syria
instead of doing it himeelf.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 2888

  #5  
Old November 5th 03, 09:34 AM
Matt Giwer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "They aren't who you think", by Steven J. Dick ...

Alfred A. Aburto Jr. wrote:

I wonder though, aren't we machines? Aren't we some construct of nature, or
....? Maybe ETI or AI has already been here billions of years ago and we are
the result (one answer to the Fermi question I guess). Why would AI be so
different from us in ways of thinking or behavior?


Or we are inorganic machines experiencing a rather complex but wholely fantastic creation
of BQ7r9 the avant garde game maker. But like the French movies in this reality game the
entire experience seems rather pointless. Two manipulators down for Earth to the Stars II.
It is a very poor sequal.

--
It is not clear why Bush sent his dogs to attack Syria
instead of doing it himeelf.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 2888

  #6  
Old November 5th 03, 03:00 PM
Anthony Cerrato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "They aren't who you think", by Steven J. Dick ...


"Matt Giwer" wrote in message
. com...
Alfred A. Aburto Jr. wrote:

I wonder though, aren't we machines? Aren't we some

construct of nature, or
....? Maybe ETI or AI has already been here billions of

years ago and we are
the result (one answer to the Fermi question I guess).

Why would AI be so
different from us in ways of thinking or behavior?


Or we are inorganic machines experiencing a rather complex

but wholely fantastic creation
of BQ7r9 the avant garde game maker.


Also possible!

But like the French movies in this reality game the
entire experience seems rather pointless. Two manipulators

down for Earth to the Stars II.
It is a very poor sequal.


:-)) ...tonyC

--
It is not clear why Bush sent his dogs to attack Syria
instead of doing it himeelf.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 2888



  #7  
Old November 5th 03, 03:00 PM
Anthony Cerrato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "They aren't who you think", by Steven J. Dick ...


"Matt Giwer" wrote in message
. com...
Alfred A. Aburto Jr. wrote:

I wonder though, aren't we machines? Aren't we some

construct of nature, or
....? Maybe ETI or AI has already been here billions of

years ago and we are
the result (one answer to the Fermi question I guess).

Why would AI be so
different from us in ways of thinking or behavior?


Or we are inorganic machines experiencing a rather complex

but wholely fantastic creation
of BQ7r9 the avant garde game maker.


Also possible!

But like the French movies in this reality game the
entire experience seems rather pointless. Two manipulators

down for Earth to the Stars II.
It is a very poor sequal.


:-)) ...tonyC

--
It is not clear why Bush sent his dogs to attack Syria
instead of doing it himeelf.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 2888



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HST dir Dr. Steven Beckwith on WABC radio 14.2.04 02:20 GMT stretch Policy 0 February 13th 04 08:42 PM
no reply from Steven Mogg ? adam bootle Amateur Astronomy 4 August 10th 03 11:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.