|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
December 7th 18, 06:15 PM
posted to sci.astro
|
|||
|
|||
The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False
Here is vigorous motion of water in an electric field, obviously able to produce work - e.g. by rotating a waterwheel:
"The Formation of the Floating Water Bridge including electric breakdowns" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17UD1goTFhQ The work will be done at the expense of: (A) electric energy. (B) ambient heat, in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. (C) Who cares. The correct answer is obviously (B). Post-truth scientists unanimously consider (C) as the correct answer. https://bissolijr.files.wordpress.co...ssed.jpg?w=570 Pentcho Valev 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Second Law of Thermodynamics: Both False and Invincible | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 4th 18 03:32 PM |
| Why the False Second Law of Thermodynamics Still Holds | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | November 2nd 17 09:17 AM |
| Second Law of Thermodynamics: Paradoxical or False? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | September 21st 17 02:48 PM |
| Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | September 17th 16 02:00 PM |
| THE FALSE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 2nd 14 12:10 PM |
Threaded Mode