![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder about this......
with a shuttle like vehicle on the top of the stack, ad no solids. plus the ability to launch very heavy loads when desired. the 2nd skylab could of been put in orbit, ISS could of been built with fewer larger modules no solids to have leaky joints, no foam loss damaging TPS. and we could of slowly done more apolo applications missions. was the shuttle ever cheaper to operate than apollo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If the saturn family of launchers had continued, with the shuttleon a saturn, von braun wanted to make saturn reusable | William Mook[_2_] | Policy | 76 | July 7th 15 02:52 PM |
4-Space Hopping: Propulsion Applied Crystallography (Continued) | American | Policy | 2 | October 3rd 08 01:17 PM |
Lockheed Martin selected for continued developmet of the innovative space based radar.... | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | May 24th 05 03:37 PM |
Cassini program Saturn Observation Campaign | Morris Jones | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 8th 05 02:17 AM |
Space Shuttle Boosters and Launch Pad Revell Model Kit on eBay | TB | Space Shuttle | 2 | February 1st 05 07:00 AM |