![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The shuttle deployed tether element that was only within LEO space, is what proves a great deal of solar and cosmic charged energy can be easily tapped, especially when derived from a dipole of essentially two elements offering their considerable voltage differential and unlimited recharge or energy resource that's every bit as dependable as the sun, Earth and our moon.
When our NASA/Apollo era went to/from our moon, they had to cross through some of the Earth-moon-L1 zone each and every time, and in fact having done so multiple times. Yet never a word of any science as to what that extremely vacant area of 20~200 particles/cm3 and its voltage differential had to offer. In other words, our moon of likely one polarity and Earth of the other, and the constant ion and magnetic flows from our sun and even a little bit as derived from Earth, as such was never Apollo era researched nor objectively investigated for its potential (they didn't even have a clue about Cruithne, and only recently do we have a viable fly-by-rocket lander that can be scaled to suit). I guess they were always too busy with our mutually perpetrated cold-war era to bother with any actual science researching into such matters of extracting energy, much less for any practical function like CVD, propulsion or anything else whatsoever, perhaps because any form of renewable energy is typically oligarch, Bilderberg and Rothschild taboo. As you know, beamed energy has all sorts of practical uses, including the most popular one of simply ignoring and/or wasting it, or at best utilizing it as a WMD against mostly people of color because the all-white oligarchs, Bilderbergs and Rothschilds have always considered most of them as expendable, and go figure as to why most of them upper caste happen to be those of our Jewish oligarchs, Rothschilds and Bilderbergs that get to do as they please, regardless of whomever we elect or appoint (even you have made this matter perfectly clear, in that they continually self finance by simply issuing their own lines of credit that only the lower 99.9999% caste always get to pay for. Here again our good friend George Carlin was always very capable at telling this like it really is. In either case of directly using our moon or even that of an artificial solar shade disk, this Earth L1 space-based energy potential would become truly considerable via solar farming at 1.4 kw/m2 (not to mention tether dipole derived energy), whereas a disk area of 9.49e12 m2 intended as a geoengineered solar shade for our GW+AGW stricken planet is also offering 13,000 TW to do whatever with. On Thursday, August 14, 2014 10:37:00 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Friday, August 15, 2014 4:23:34 PM UTC+12, Brad Guth wrote: A dipole tether element as centered at the Earth-moon L1 should give megavolts if not gigavolts of differential for yet another CVD process of creating those diamond fibers. Well, electrodynamic tethers are conductors that generate a current by moving through a planet's magnetic field. The magnetic field strength of the Earth is 1e-4 Gauss at Earth's surface, and that falls off with the cube of the distance. So, at the moon's distance, of 60 earth radii, it drops to 4.5e-8 Gauss at the moon's surface. The moon doesn't have a dipole magnetic field as the Earth does, though does exhibit some local magnetizations likely due to meteorite impacts. A massive rock hitting the moon at high speed causes heating, and also the electrons tend to accelerate differently than nuclei - this creates a temporary charge that when discharged, produces a powerful magnetic pulse that is imprinted on the hot rock as it cools. That's the theory at least. So, if I am to understand what you're saying, you are suggesting that we can erect a tether attached to the moon, and deboost the moon using the Earth's magnetic field? This makes use of the torque transferred to the moon by the moon's tidal acceleration by the Earth's oceans. There is 3.75 trillion watts of energy dissipated by tidal friction of which 2.50 trillion watts of energy is transferred to the moon. If you could deploy a tether to extract all of that, you would keep the moon from flying away, and generate 2.5 trillion watts. Now, at present, according to the IEA the world consumes energy at a rate of 13,130 millon tonnes of crude oil equivalent a year - at 42 GJ/tonne that's 551.46 exajoules or 17.45 trillion watts. So, 2.5 trillion watts created by such a tether really isn't all that large! Though if used to eject material from the moon at 2.3 km/sec to arrive back at Earth, 945,180 tonnes per second can be ejected from the moon in this way. The interesting thing here is that by falling all the way to Earth, and accelerating to 10.9 km/sec before re-entry, this material heats up the Earth's atmosphere, and causes atmospheric winds that increase spin - if done rightly - which has the potential to increase the rate of spin - preserving the rate of spin of the Earth by extracting the potential energy of the falling material! Do, we need 945,180 tonnes per second? That's 4,189 tonnes per person per year. On Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:27:43 PM UTC-7, wrote: Chemical Vapour Deposition processes can be done easily in a lunar environment. Further, the ability to concentrate uv light from the sun makes UV processing simpler as well. A very modest setup can be used to process lunar soil in this way, particularly with MEMS based units Type nm Pct. W/m2 UVA 400 7.99% 109.3 UVB 315 2.04% 28.0 UVC 280 2.05% 28.1 These wavelengths can image very tiny submicron objects and project spots that are submicron. This is useful in 3D printing that use two UV photons to catalyze a reaction in build materials. At 3.2 eV to 12.4 eV per photon, the wavelengths are energetic enough to break materials down as well! With a specific energy requirement of 40 MJ/kg and 165.4 W/m2 we can see that solar powered robots on the moon, that make use of the UV light source in Vacuo, can process 357 grams per day of rock into *anything*! 357 grams per square meter made of silicon at 2.3 g/cc is a surface 155 microns thick! Which is larger than systems currently being constructed for space use! http://scitechdaily.com/new-material...n-solar-cells/ So a MEMS based micro-fabrication plant built into a solar panel that has a back side that chews up lunar regolith, processes the material with UV light in the vacuum of the moon, all at the atomic level, recombining the atoms into desired molecules to use to 3D print extensions of the original panel, creates a sort of self-replicating machine that makes use of ambient light, materials and the high vacuum environment, to extend an original panel indefinitely. A square meter doubling every 24 hours of sunlight exposure becomes 16,384 square meters in a single lunar day. A month later, this grows to 268 sq km! In the third month this grows to cover 46.2% of the lunar surface! 4.39 million sq km. These panels operating together process 398.1 million tonnes of material every 24 hours - continuously, with a peak of 1,567.2 million tonnes. An Electron launcher putting 110 kg into a 500 km polar orbit http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/07...ap_satellites/ that consists of MEMS based rocket array fashioned into a sphere 551 mm in diameter. This sphere contains another sphere inside, like a Russian doll, that is 478.3 mm in diameter. This smaller sphere contains LOX. The larger sphere contains kerosene in the space between the two. The smaller sphere is attached to a header that feeds the outer skin of MEMS rockets which propel the vehicle and orient it. The MEMS skin is also equipped with a large number of linked HDTV cameras that give a 360 degree view of the vehicle's surroundings. Further, phase array elements operate together across the surface to beam information back to Earth. The outer skin 0.954 square meters in area produces a continuous 180 watts of electrical power when in sunlight. The spacecraft consumes 100 Watts of electrical power during its 3.5 day journey to the moon. It has an array of super capacitors to store power for times of darkness, and has 9,600 Watt-hours of storage capacity. http://www.natureworldnews.com/artic...-nanotubes.htm http://interestingengineering.com/pa...c-view-camera/ The 110 kg spacecraft has 24.6575 kg of Kerosene and 65.3425 kg of LOX on board feeding an array of MEMS micro-rockets that produce a 3.5 km/sec exhaust speed. This 90 kg of propellant sends the 110 kg sphere to a soft landing on the moon. http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/2.5833 17.1636 kg of Kerosene combined with 45.4868 kg of LOX propel the spacecraft from its polar orbit to a lunar transfer orbit. It arrives at the backside of the moon and then expends another 6.2488 kg of Kerosene along with another 16.5595 kg of LOX to land softly on the lunar surface on a hill side 6 degrees North of Daedalus Crater 8 degrees East of Coriolis Crater. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ma...mp2/300dpi.jpg At the time of this launch another similar spacecraft is launched, however, this spacecraft enters a highly elliptical orbit inclined to the plane of the lunar orbit so that it moves slowly over the moon's far side and is still visible from Earth. Another spacecraft is launched which boosts to a Southerly oriented Molniya type orbit that permits a ground station located in Auckland NZ to maintai... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Geoengineering via Moon relocation and China exploiting itsinnards / Brad Guth | [email protected] | Misc | 31 | August 15th 14 10:51 PM |
Geoengineering via Moon relocation and China exploiting itsinnards / Brad Guth | [email protected] | Misc | 4 | August 14th 14 05:13 AM |
Geoengineering via Moon relocation and China exploiting itsinnards / Brad Guth | [email protected] | Misc | 3 | May 24th 14 05:34 PM |
Geoengineering via Moon relocation and China exploiting itsinnards / Brad Guth | [email protected] | Misc | 5 | March 9th 14 12:38 AM |