The colorful elements of our moon and otherwise Venus, each havetheir issues

On Sunday, May 11, 2014 12:01:40 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
What's honestly not to like about our physically dark and paramagnetic moon, plus an extremely nearby planet like Venus?



Even dysfunctional 5th graders can view-in and contribute on behalf of this one small radar topography mapped area of what "GuthVenus" has to offer, by simply using their smart phones, tablets and you-name-it computers along with most any browser or Photozoom. Then they can start asking their teachers why our NASA is still acting so indifferent by keeping their media goons and FUD-masters busy at topic/author stalking and trashing anyone taking any interest in whatever GuthVenus or that of our moon has to offer.



Was our Magellan mission of radar imaging Venus bogus, and were all of our Apollo era wizards colorblind?



Kids could also ask the same of their parents, except most parents are just as scared to death of our government and wouldn't dare so much as even look at whatever a nearby planet like Venus has to offer. If pushed on this issue, most parents would have to put their kids up for adoption, rather than ever having to admit how mainstream snookered and dumbfounded they actually are.



Don't hold your breath on this one, kids. Your teachers, peers, parents and grandparents are absolutely scared to death of going up against the mainstream status quo, especially when it also points out how easily snookered and dumbfounded they've been all along, as even complicit in the act of fooling everyone including themselves.



Besides what Venus has to offer (just about everything imaginable), it seems our physically dark moon isn't nearly as monochromatic and inert or even nearly as reflective as our NASA/Apollo era has always suggested to us, and its innards could be yet another treasure trove of good stuff including mineral brines and easy access to numerous common and rare elements, while everyone involved with TBMs and exploitation remains perfectly failsafe and cozy. In other words, where's the down side?



Amateurs as even obstructed by our polluted atmosphere can do so much better than any of our NASA, JPL or ASU has to offer.

http://www.astronomie.be/christophe....lor/index.html

As once again we get to see for ourselves, with proper narrow bandpass color filters and proper composite image work, using only the natural colors as merely enhanced though not even by 10% as good as our NASA, JPL and ASU could have accomplished decades ago with their heat and radiation proof Kodak film, and otherwise especially as derived from their spendy LROC. None the less, once again we get a full visual spectrum look-see at what seems to depict a treasure trove of common and rare elements.



Go figure, and no wonder China has become focused upon exploiting it first.