![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's what I did:
1) Stand in front of mirror with measuring stick and get a read on the outside diameter of my iris. 2) Take a picture of my eye in a darkened room using the digital camera set to basic flash mode (no double flashing for light sense. Didn't worry too much about focus, and took a couple pictures at varying distances to get a usable focused image.) 3) Transfer image to laptop via USB. 4) Display image and hold measuring stick to displayed image of eye, iris and pupil. 5) Measure the diameter of the iris in the picture. 6) Measure the diameter of the pupil in the picture. 7) Calculate the percentage of pupil occupying the iris, by diameter. 8) Multiply the mirror and measuring stick value by percentage derived in step 7. Result: Iris diameter = 13mm "Dark" pupil diameter by percentage = 50% Dark pupil diameter = 6.5mm I'm 44 years old. -Stephen Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's what I did.
Photocopied the star image dot scale from my Sky Atlas 2000.0 Cut the copy with an exacto knife right down the center of the dots that represent the different magnitudes. Measured the dots. Stood in front of the mirror with my dot scale held up in front of my eye (overlapping my pupil by one half) and slid the scale back and forth until one of the half dots matched my pupil. I measured 5.5mmL and 6mmR. I was not able to do this in any light less than a subdued daylit room light. In a fairly darkened room I could not see my pupils. In a fully darkened room with a red light I could not see my pupils. Turning even a low room light on I could see my pupils instantly contract. So last time (a few weeks ago) I visited the eye doctor I asked him to measure my dark adapted pupils. He uses a similar half dot scale. Only thing is he could not do it in a fully darkedned room. At first in a fully dark room with a finger over his tiny light he got 7.5-8.0mm, but he stated he was having a hard time really seeing the pupil accurately. He also needed to use a subdued light. With a dim room light turned on behind me, he measured 6.5mmL and 7.0mmR. My attempt at home was in a room far more lit that at the eye doctor's office. I'm near 51. edz |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use a set of metric Allen wrenches. Go out at night and wait for your=20
eyes to be fully dark adapted. At least 20 minutes. Hold an Allen wrench = one at a time close to your eye and look at a medium bright star. I rest = the wrench on my cheek. With small sizes you will see two stars, one on=20 each side of the wrench. Work up until you only see one star, on one=20 side of the wrench or the other. I've heard some people can see two=20 stars when using a regular wooden pencil. That's about 7mm. To me a=20 pencil looks like a board! I can just see two stars with a 3mm wrench=20 and only see one with a 4mm thus my pupil is right around 4mm. Sky &=20 Telescope magazine sells a little gauge for measuring nighttime pupils=20 as well. It's a piece of mylar with paired holes from 1mm to 9mm apart.=20 It works on the same principal as my Allen wrench method. You can also=20 use strips of black paper cut to various widths or drill bits. -Florian Stargazing.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:52:32 -0400, "Stephen Paul"
wrote: Here's what I did: 1) Stand in front of mirror with measuring stick and get a read on the outside diameter of my iris. 2) Take a picture of my eye in a darkened room using the digital camera set SNIP... I'm 44 years old. -Stephen Paul I tried a different method - probably not very accurate, though. I cut a strip of paper about 8 inches long and tapered it from about 7mm to about 3mm. Then I marked off the points at which the strip was 3,4,5,6 and 7mm wide. Several times during an observing session last Friday, I held the strip up to my observing eye and looked at Mars. When I moved the strip up or down to the point where Mars blinked out, I pinched the strip at the position in front of my eye and then looked at the strip to see where I was marking it. The index marks indicated how wide the strip was at that point. The best I did was about 5.5mm but we had a pretty bright sky and other stuff I was doing that prevented my getting fully dark-adapted. I plan to try the same method at a really dark site to see how much, if any, difference there is there. Les Blalock http://www.txastro.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "edz" wrote in message om... Here's what I did. Photocopied the star image dot scale from my Sky Atlas 2000.0 Cut the copy with an exacto knife right down the center of the dots that represent the different magnitudes. Measured the dots. Stood in front of the mirror with my dot scale held up in front of my eye (overlapping my pupil by one half) and slid the scale back and forth until one of the half dots matched my pupil. I measured 5.5mmL and 6mmR. I was not able to do this in any light less than a subdued daylit room light. In a fairly darkened room I could not see my pupils. In a fully darkened room with a red light I could not see my pupils. Turning even a low room light on I could see my pupils instantly contract. So last time (a few weeks ago) I visited the eye doctor I asked him to measure my dark adapted pupils. He uses a similar half dot scale. Only thing is he could not do it in a fully darkedned room. At first in a fully dark room with a finger over his tiny light he got 7.5-8.0mm, but he stated he was having a hard time really seeing the pupil accurately. He also needed to use a subdued light. With a dim room light turned on behind me, he measured 6.5mmL and 7.0mmR. My attempt at home was in a room far more lit that at the eye doctor's office. I'm near 51. edz http://astro.umsystem.edu/atm/ARCHIV.../msg00354.html Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Stephen Paul" wrote: Here's what I did: 1) Stand in front of mirror with measuring stick and get a read on the outside diameter of my iris. 2) Take a picture of my eye in a darkened room using the digital camera set to basic flash mode (no double flashing for light sense. Didn't worry too much about focus, and took a couple pictures at varying distances to get a usable focused image.) 3) Transfer image to laptop via USB. 4) Display image and hold measuring stick to displayed image of eye, iris and pupil. 5) Measure the diameter of the iris in the picture. 6) Measure the diameter of the pupil in the picture. 7) Calculate the percentage of pupil occupying the iris, by diameter. 8) Multiply the mirror and measuring stick value by percentage derived in step 7. Result: Iris diameter = 13mm "Dark" pupil diameter by percentage = 50% Dark pupil diameter = 6.5mm I'm 44 years old. -Stephen Paul I used a metric ruler in a dark bathroom with a dim red light to see by. I just held it up to my eye after my eyes had dark-adapted and I could see the ruler. My measurement also came to 6.5mm (I am 43 yrs old). However, I soon after went to the eye doctor and he dilated my pupils with that icky stuff they put in your eyes and told me my pupils only dilated to 5.5mm. But I have to admit, I don't trust any measurement they did in a lighted room after dumping stuff in my eye. I'm sticking with 6.5mm until I measure it differently. -sdg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:52:32 -0400, "Stephen Paul"
wrote: Here's what I did: 1) Stand in front of mirror with measuring stick and get a read on the outside diameter of my iris. 2) Take a picture of my eye in a darkened room using the digital camera set to basic flash mode (no double flashing for light sense. Didn't worry too much about focus, and took a couple pictures at varying distances to get a usable focused image.) 3) Transfer image to laptop via USB. 4) Display image and hold measuring stick to displayed image of eye, iris and pupil. 5) Measure the diameter of the iris in the picture. 6) Measure the diameter of the pupil in the picture. 7) Calculate the percentage of pupil occupying the iris, by diameter. 8) Multiply the mirror and measuring stick value by percentage derived in step 7. Result: Iris diameter = 13mm "Dark" pupil diameter by percentage = 50% Dark pupil diameter = 6.5mm I'm 44 years old. -Stephen Paul I performed this operation twice, for accuracy... I just sat in the bathroom, in the dark, but only for two or three minutes before I stood up to the mirror with red light and 6-inch rule with metric graduations in hand... My iris is closer to 14mm in diameter. My pupils, in both eyes, easily reached 7mm, and perhaps even approaching 8mm. This is not surprising to me, given the stark, almost iris-eclipsing diameters in an elementary-school picture, and having been mistakenly suspected by a teacher of being under the influence of marijuana in the 11th grade(marijuana dilates the pupils considerably.) Not that I didn't indulge altogether in reckless youth, however. I am 39. Alan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alan W. Craft" wrote in message
... I just sat in the bathroom, in the dark, but only for two or three minutes before I stood up to the mirror with red light and 6-inch rule with metric graduations in hand... My iris is closer to 14mm in diameter. My pupils, in both eyes, easily reached 7mm, and perhaps even approaching 8mm. Cool!! I'm beginning to wonder how accurate is the statement that 5mm is typical for the over 40 crowd. Maybe we are doing this all wrong. -Stephen |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cool!! I'm beginning to wonder how accurate is the statement that 5mm =
is typical for the over 40 crowd. Maybe we are doing this all wrong. Mine are less than 4mm. ;-( But my active imagination makes up for it! -Florian |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:20:24 -0700, "Florian" wrote:
Cool!! I'm beginning to wonder how accurate is the statement that 5mm is typical for the over 40 crowd. Maybe we are doing this all wrong. Mine are less than 4mm. ;-( But my active imagination makes up for it! -Florian You're not as old as that would seem to suggest. I wonder what accounts for it. Perhaps you nearly exhausted the associated muscles over time by some unknown activity or other. Alan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Has ESA's XMM-Newton cast doubt over dark energy? (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 12th 03 07:15 PM |
"Dark matter" forms dense clumps in ghost universe (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 21st 03 04:41 PM |
3D Map of Universe Bolsters Case for Dark Energy and Dark Matter(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 29th 03 12:06 AM |
A Detailed Map of Dark Matter in a Galactic Cluster Reveals How Giant Cosmic Structures Formed | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 5th 03 02:16 PM |
Hubble tracks down a galaxy cluster's dark matter (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 01:42 PM |