![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.
The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the Genesis Rock, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the Genesis Rock? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the Genesis Rock and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is ten times older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3ę31ę„, äøå10ę23å, Wretch Fossil wrote:
The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong. The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is ten times older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4ę1ę„, äøå8ę14å, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 3ę31ę„, om wrote: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong. The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is ten times older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2). The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4ę1ę„, äøå1ę00å, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4ę1ę„, m wrote: On 3ę31ę„, om wrote: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong. The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is ten times older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2). The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed Ā*around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth. The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years(4.54 Ć 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samplesā¦.Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in calcium andaluminium) ā the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites that are formed within the solar system ā are 4.567 billion years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit for the age of Earth. It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites." Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Quote from Ref. 2: āSome meteorites are furthermore considered to represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk was formed.[26] ā Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4ę1ę„, äøå6ę53å, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4ę1ę„, m wrote: On 4ę1ę„, m wrote: On 3ę31ę„, om wrote: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong. The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is ten times older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4..5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2). The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed Ā*around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth. The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years(4.54 Ć 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samplesā¦.Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in calcium andaluminium) ā the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites that are formed within the solar system ā are 4.567 billion years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit for the age of Earth. It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites." Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Quote from Ref. 2: āSome meteorites are furthermore considered to represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk was formed.[26] ā Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is eternal or at least billions of years older than that. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth. The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because 99.99% of planets had existed for billions of years before animals lived on any of them. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5- billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years(4.54 Ć 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samplesā¦.Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in calcium andaluminium) ā the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites that are formed within the solar system ā are 4.567 billion years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit for the age of Earth. It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites." Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Quote from Ref. 2: āSome meteorites are furthermore considered to represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk was formed.[26] ā Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 2, 4:35Ā*am, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4ę1ę„, äøå6ę53å, Wretch Fossil wrote: On 4ę1ę„, m wrote: On 4ę1ę„, m wrote: On 3ę31ę„, om wrote: The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong. The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is ten times older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites formed.. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet (Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2). The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed Ā*around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth. The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years(4.54 Ć 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samplesā¦.Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in calcium andaluminium) ā the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites that are formed within the solar system ā are 4.567 billion years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit for the age of Earth. It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites." Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Quote from Ref. 2: āSome meteorites are furthermore considered to represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk was formed.[26] ā Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is eternal or at least billions of years older than that. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth. The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the āGenesis Rockā, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the āGenesis Rockā? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land before the āGenesis Rockā and the meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars). The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been speculated to be much younger than it really is, because 99.99% of planets had existed for billions of years before animals lived on any of them. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5- billion-year-old āGenesis Rockā. Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years(4.54 Ć 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samplesā¦.Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in calcium andaluminium) ā the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites that are formed within the solar system ā are 4.567 billion years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit for the age of Earth. It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites." Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used Quote from Ref. 2: āSome meteorites are furthermore considered to represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk was formed.[26] ā Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420 Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Our sun couldn't possibly be 45 billion years old. So, did we/Earth as a wandering/rogue item get captured by a newer sun? After all, there's way more rogue/wandering nomad planets than stars, perhaps a thousand times more (1e15), so it's entirely possible that our planet had once been a nomad. http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / āGuth Usenetā |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 9:14*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
snip undiluted, unedited crap An airhead conversing with a lunatic on s.a.a.? Surely not? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 11:27*pm, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Apr 3, 9:14*pm, Brad Guth wrote: snip undiluted, unedited crap An airhead conversing with a lunatic on s.a.a.? Surely not? And your own rock/fossil expertise is exactly what? What sort of applied science and its best optical technology do you have to offer? What sort of personal investigative expertise do you know about fossilized biology? Are all of your supposed levels of expertise based only upon anything approved by Hitler and his army of Zionists Nazis that were sought out, sneaked in as hired and protected within our DARPA? Do you have any individual first-hand geology or evolution related expertise to offer? Are you actually suggesting that cosmic mergers and whatever gravitational captures are not possible? http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong. | Wretch Fossil | Policy | 6 | April 3rd 12 01:54 AM |
What's wrong with this NG? | vtcapo[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | November 4th 10 11:59 PM |
Valev right or wrong? - this is the wrong venue for this debate | ukastronomy | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 29th 09 02:17 PM |
breakdown at toe terribly throws Beth | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 16th 07 07:31 AM |
Not that there's anything wrong with it.... | Rusty Barton | History | 4 | November 23rd 03 07:40 PM |