A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 31st 12, 03:23 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the “Genesis Rock”,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the “Genesis Rock”? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the “Genesis Rock” and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).

The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
  #2  
Old April 1st 12, 01:14 AM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On 3月31ę—„, äø‹åˆ10Ꙃ23分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).

The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).

Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).

The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

  #3  
Old April 1st 12, 06:00 AM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On 4月1ę—„, äøŠåˆ8Ꙃ14分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 3月31ę—„, om wrote:









The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).

Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).

The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref.
1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least
45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest
meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2).

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites
represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT
formed around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The
reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous
remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5
billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites were formed. Such a
land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar
system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
  #4  
Old April 1st 12, 11:53 AM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On 4月1ę—„, äø‹åˆ1Ꙃ00分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4月1ę—„, m wrote:









On 3月31ę—„, om wrote:


The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).


Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref.
1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least
45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest
meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2).

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites
represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT
formed Ā*around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The
reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous
remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5
billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites were formed. Such a
land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar
system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1).
That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4
billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites
to get the age of Earth.

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest
meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2).
But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were
formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all,
meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal
fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies
got preserved in the meteorites and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious
that such animals existed on a land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the
meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar
system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion
years(4.54 Ɨ 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence
from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent
with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar
samples….Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the
multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be
much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in
calcium andaluminium) – the oldest known solid constituents within
meteorites that are formed within the solar system – are 4.567 billion
years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit
for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the
formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."

Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ

Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
  #5  
Old April 2nd 12, 12:35 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur
Wretch Fossil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,002
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On 4月1ę—„, äø‹åˆ6Ꙃ53分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4月1ę—„, m wrote:









On 4月1ę—„, m wrote:


On 3月31ę—„, om wrote:


The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).


Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4..5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref.
1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least
45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest
meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2).


The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites
represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT
formed Ā*around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The
reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous
remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5
billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites were formed. Such a
land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar
system (and is called Mars).


The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1).
That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4
billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites
to get the age of Earth.

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest
meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2).
But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were
formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all,
meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal
fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies
got preserved in the meteorites and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious
that such animals existed on a land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the
meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar
system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion
years(4.54 Ɨ 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence
from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent
with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar
samples….Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the
multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be
much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in
calcium andaluminium) – the oldest known solid constituents within
meteorites that are formed within the solar system – are 4.567 billion
years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit
for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the
formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."

Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ

Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1).
That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is eternal or at
least billions of years older than that. The mistake resulted from
dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth.

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest
meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2).
But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were
formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all,
meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal
fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies
got preserved in the meteorites and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious
that such animals existed on a land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the
meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar
system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because 99.99% of
planets had existed for billions of years before animals lived on any
of them. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-
billion-year-old ā€œGenesis Rockā€.

Ref. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion
years(4.54 Ɨ 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence
from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent
with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar
samples….Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the
multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be
much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in
calcium andaluminium) – the oldest known solid constituents within
meteorites that are formed within the solar system – are 4.567 billion
years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit
for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the
formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."

Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ

Ref. 3: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Ref. 4: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

  #6  
Old April 3rd 12, 08:14 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On Apr 2, 4:35Ā*am, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4月1ę—„, äø‹åˆ6Ꙃ53分, Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 4月1ę—„, m wrote:


On 4月1ę—„, m wrote:


On 3月31ę—„, om wrote:


The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2). Meteorites
were thought to have existed before the solar system formed, so they
were used in the radioactive dating method to compare their
radioactive isotopic elements against those of Earth rocks. But
meteorites did NOT exist before the solar system formed, for most
meteorites contain animal fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€,
dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). If
meteorites were the oldest material in the solar system, where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed. Such a land
did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise for dating Earth is wrong. So, the
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is ten times older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is currently estimated at 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years
(ref. 1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at
least 45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from using meteorites
to date Earth in the radioactive dating method (ref. 2).


Some meteorites were thought to have existed before the solar system
formed, so they were used in the radioactive dating method to
determine the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites did NOT exist
before the solar system formed, for most meteorites contain animal
fossils (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years
old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist
before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites and the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a land
before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites formed.. Such a land did
not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar system
(and is called Mars).


The above shows the basic premise is wrong in dating the Earth. The
age of Earth has been estimated younger than reality, for a planet
(Mars, Earth, or whatever) could have existed billions of years before
it was populated with animals. Therefore, it is no wonder that Earth
is billions of years older than 4.54 billion years.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is speculated to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref.
1). That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least
45.4 billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest
meteorites to get the age of Earth (ref. 2).


The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed, so the age of the oldest meteorites
represents the age of the Earth (ref. 2). But meteorites were NOT
formed Ā*around the time our Sun and Earth were formed, period. The
reason is simply because most, if not all, meteorites contain numerous
remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5
billion years old, contains animal fossils (ref. 4). Where did the
animals exist before their dead bodies got preserved in the meteorites
and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious that such animals existed on a
land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the meteorites were formed. Such a
land did not exist outside the solar system. It existed in the solar
system (and is called Mars).


The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:


The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1).
That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is at least 45.4
billion years. The mistake resulted from dating the oldest meteorites
to get the age of Earth.


The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest
meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2).
But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were
formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all,
meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal
fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies
got preserved in the meteorites and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious
that such animals existed on a land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the
meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar
system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).


The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because almost any
planet in the universe, including Earth and Mars, had existed billions
of years before it was populated by animals. So, Mars and Earth are
multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-billion-year-old ā€œGenesis
Rockā€.


Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion
years(4.54 Ɨ 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence
from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent
with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar
samples….Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the
multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be
much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in
calcium andaluminium) – the oldest known solid constituents within
meteorites that are formed within the solar system – are 4.567 billion
years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit
for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the
formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."


Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ


Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420


Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


New edition:

The age of Earth is said to be 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years (ref. 1).
That age is terribly wrong, as the real age of Earth is eternal or at
least billions of years older than that. The mistake resulted from
dating the oldest meteorites to get the age of Earth.

The oldest meteorites were thought to be formed around the time when
our Sun and Earth were formed (ref. 2). So, the age of the oldest
meteorites is considered the upper limit of the age of Earth (ref. 2).
But meteorites were NOT formed around the time our Sun and Earth were
formed, period. The reason is simply because most, if not all,
meteorites contain numerous remains of mammals (ref. 3). Even the
ā€œGenesis Rockā€, dated at 4.5 billion years old, contains animal
fossils (ref. 4). Where did the animals exist before their dead bodies
got preserved in the meteorites and the ā€œGenesis Rockā€? It is obvious
that such animals existed on a land before the ā€œGenesis Rockā€ and the
meteorites were formed. Such a land did not exist outside the solar
system. It existed in the solar system (and is called Mars).

The above shows how wrong is the speculation that the oldest
meteorites are nearly as old as Earth. The age of Earth has been
speculated to be much younger than it really is, because 99.99% of
planets had existed for billions of years before animals lived on any
of them. So, Mars and Earth are multi-billion-years older than the 4.5-
billion-year-old ā€œGenesis Rockā€.

Ref. 1:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Quote from Ref. 1: " The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion
years(4.54 Ɨ 109 years ± 1%).[1][2][3] This age is based on evidence
from radiometric age dating of meteorite material and is consistent
with the ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar
samples….Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the
multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be
much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-rich inclusions (inclusions rich in
calcium andaluminium) – the oldest known solid constituents within
meteorites that are formed within the solar system – are 4.567 billion
years old,[8][9] giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit
for the age of Earth.
It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the
formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites."

Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_...ites_were_used
Quote from Ref. 2: ā€œSome meteorites are furthermore considered to
represent the primitive material from which the accreting solar disk
was formed.[26] ā€œ

Ref. 3:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Ref. 4:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21624420

Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0


Our sun couldn't possibly be 45 billion years old.

So, did we/Earth as a wandering/rogue item get captured by a newer
sun?

After all, there's way more rogue/wandering nomad planets than stars,
perhaps a thousand times more (1e15), so it's entirely possible that
our planet had once been a nomad.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / ā€œGuth Usenetā€
  #7  
Old April 4th 12, 07:27 AM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur
Chris.B[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,410
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On Apr 3, 9:14*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
snip undiluted, unedited crap

An airhead conversing with a lunatic on s.a.a.? Surely not?
  #8  
Old April 4th 12, 07:42 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong.

On Apr 3, 11:27*pm, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Apr 3, 9:14*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
snip undiluted, unedited crap

An airhead conversing with a lunatic on s.a.a.? Surely not?


And your own rock/fossil expertise is exactly what?

What sort of applied science and its best optical technology do you
have to offer?

What sort of personal investigative expertise do you know about
fossilized biology?

Are all of your supposed levels of expertise based only upon anything
approved by Hitler and his army of Zionists Nazis that were sought
out, sneaked in as hired and protected within our DARPA?

Do you have any individual first-hand geology or evolution related
expertise to offer?

Are you actually suggesting that cosmic mergers and whatever
gravitational captures are not possible?

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Age of Earth Is Terribly Wrong. Wretch Fossil Policy 6 April 3rd 12 01:54 AM
What's wrong with this NG? vtcapo[_2_] Astronomy Misc 3 November 4th 10 11:59 PM
Valev right or wrong? - this is the wrong venue for this debate ukastronomy Astronomy Misc 1 January 29th 09 02:17 PM
breakdown at toe terribly throws Beth [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 0 August 16th 07 07:31 AM
Not that there's anything wrong with it.... Rusty Barton History 4 November 23rd 03 07:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.