![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan wrote:
Looks like fun! OTOH... There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie. ;-) Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/20/2011 3:02 PM, David Spain wrote:
OTOH... There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie. It would be fun to see how well they did the Soviet LK lander: http://media.photobucket.com/image/a...x/lklander.jpg Looks pretty good from what little you can see of it in the photo. Pat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Spain" wrote in message ... Jonathan wrote: Looks like fun! OTOH... There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie. The trailer has over a million hits on Utube, looks like it might be a fairly big budget sci-fi. Too few of them these days. And they seem to have combined the popular story lines of urban legend, vampires and conspiracy theories into a nice creepy format. Instead of a haunted house on some lonely hill, they're cooped-up in that little LEM. Here's another trailer with some additional scenes. The very last scene is interesting. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3ynp...eature=related ;-) Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 20, 5:02*pm, David Spain wrote:
There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie.. A lot of people saw "The Blair Witch Project", so why couldn't this one get an audience? Of course, the premise is silly; after all, if the Moon parasites attacked the astronauts _on_ the Moon, as this was _after_ the launch, how do you explain the fact that no one remembers watching the launch of Apollo 18 with Walter Cronkite? I'm sure they thought of _something_, like a secret military mission to check up on a failed Russian moon landing, but then they should have called the film "Apollo 17 1/2" or "UIMMM-1" (USAF Investigative Manned Moon Mission - 1). Also, there's the Case of the Missing Expensive Lawn Ornament to be concerned about... John Savard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Quadibloc" wrote in message ... On Aug 20, 5:02 pm, David Spain wrote: There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie. A lot of people saw "The Blair Witch Project", so why couldn't this one get an audience? Right, all those fuzzy and halting moon videos have a 'blair witch' feel to it. Of course, the premise is silly; after all, if the Moon parasites attacked the astronauts _on_ the Moon, as this was _after_ the launch, None of the above are facts in evidence. My impression is closer to little underground moon vampires scurrying about~ But then it could be the russians were up to something, they were awefully good with all the paranormal and mind-control stuff back then. how do you explain the fact that no one remembers watching the launch mof Apollo 18 with Walter Cronkite? Well no one ever heard of Apollo 20 either Maybe this long secret video explains things better~ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqR8zDGIwMo I'm sure they thought of _something_, like a secret military mission to check up on a failed Russian moon landing, but then they should have called the film "Apollo 17 1/2" or "UIMMM-1" (USAF Investigative Manned Moon Mission - 1). There must be SOME reason we never went back? It couldn't be that the moon is just a worthless pile of rocks and dust. Also, there's the Case of the Missing Expensive Lawn Ornament to be concerned about... Maybe Andy Griffith mounted a salvage mission to the moon and sold it off at auction. John Savard |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 21, 10:14*am, "Jonathan" wrote:
"Quadibloc" wrote in message ... On Aug 20, 5:02 pm, David Spain wrote: There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie. A lot of people saw "The Blair Witch Project", so why couldn't this one get an audience? Right, all those fuzzy and halting moon videos have a 'blair witch' feel to it. Of course, the premise is silly; after all, if the Moon parasites attacked the astronauts _on_ the Moon, as this was _after_ the launch, None of the above are facts in evidence. My impression is closer to little underground moon vampires scurrying about~ But then it could be the russians were up to something, they were awefully good with all the paranormal and mind-control stuff back then. how do you explain the fact that no one remembers watching the launch mof Apollo 18 with Walter Cronkite? Well no one ever heard of Apollo 20 either Maybe this long secret video explains things better~http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqR8zDGIwMo I'm sure they thought of _something_, like a secret military mission to check up on a failed Russian moon landing, but then they should have called the film "Apollo 17 1/2" or "UIMMM-1" (USAF Investigative Manned Moon Mission - 1). There must be SOME reason we never went back? It couldn't be that the moon is just a worthless pile of rocks and dust. Also, there's the Case of the Missing Expensive Lawn Ornament to be concerned about... Maybe Andy Griffith mounted a salvage mission to the moon and sold it off at auction. John Savard- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - could a saturn 5 have been launched to moon orbit from vandenberg? was it technically possible?? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"bob haller" skrev i meddelelsen
... could a saturn 5 have been launched to moon orbit from vandenberg? was it technically possible?? Technically? Probably, at some payload penalty because of Vandenberg's more northerly location. But the launch, of necessity going east, would have been over a densely populated area - not nice in case of a crash of something with the chemical energy of a small nuclear warhead. And the S-IC stage would fall 560 km east of the launch site anyway, which from VAFB would not be in the Atlantic Ocean, but a little past the border to Arizona as far as I can tell. If you want to launch into a polar orbit around the Earth, and then to the Moon, you get a great big delta-v penalty... plus of course you need to duplicate the KSC launch facilities on VAFB. Jon Lennart Beck. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 21, 8:14*am, "Jonathan" wrote:
Well no one ever heard of Apollo 20 either Maybe this long secret video explains things better~ And here I was expecting the "Iron Sky" trailer... John Savard |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jonathan
wrote: "David Spain" wrote in message ... Jonathan wrote: Looks like fun! OTOH... There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie. The trailer has over a million hits on Utube, looks like it might be a fairly big budget sci-fi. No, it's very low budget from the look of it. Put two guys in front of a static camera, or have one of the a characters filming the other. Basically, Paranormal Activity with CGI ![]() -- Chris Mack "If we show any weakness, the monsters will get cocky!" 'Invid Fan' - 'Yokai Monsters Along With Ghosts' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A new analysis of a lunar rock brought back by the 1972 Apollo 16mission suggests.... | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | August 20th 11 05:59 AM |
Why didn't Apollo keep the ascent module as extra space on the way back? | [email protected] | History | 89 | January 31st 11 08:12 PM |
The news said it costs 2 million dollars to bring the shuttle back to Florida on the back of the 747 | lab~rat >:-) | Space Shuttle | 9 | June 22nd 09 05:08 PM |
NASA plans to put astronauts back on moon by 2018, using old Apollo parts | Raving Loonie | Misc | 21 | September 21st 05 08:08 PM |
Apollo 9 question (was: Will we ever get this group back on topic?) | OM | History | 1 | May 14th 04 10:49 AM |