A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 11, 12:20 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)


Looks like fun!

Apollo 18 Movie Clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F6DU6gx7-w


s


  #2  
Old August 21st 11, 12:02 AM posted to sci.space.policy
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,901
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)

Jonathan wrote:
Looks like fun!


OTOH...

There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie.

;-)

Dave
  #3  
Old August 21st 11, 05:14 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)

On 8/20/2011 3:02 PM, David Spain wrote:

OTOH...

There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie.


It would be fun to see how well they did the Soviet LK lander:
http://media.photobucket.com/image/a...x/lklander.jpg
Looks pretty good from what little you can see of it in the photo.

Pat
  #4  
Old August 21st 11, 01:02 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)


"David Spain" wrote in message
...
Jonathan wrote:
Looks like fun!


OTOH...

There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie.



The trailer has over a million hits on Utube, looks like it might
be a fairly big budget sci-fi. Too few of them these days.
And they seem to have combined the popular story lines
of urban legend, vampires and conspiracy theories into
a nice creepy format. Instead of a haunted house on some
lonely hill, they're cooped-up in that little LEM.

Here's another trailer with some additional scenes.
The very last scene is interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3ynp...eature=related




;-)

Dave




  #5  
Old August 21st 11, 01:09 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Quadibloc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,018
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)

On Aug 20, 5:02*pm, David Spain wrote:

There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie..


A lot of people saw "The Blair Witch Project", so why couldn't this
one get an audience?

Of course, the premise is silly; after all, if the Moon parasites
attacked the astronauts _on_ the Moon, as this was _after_ the launch,
how do you explain the fact that no one remembers watching the launch
of Apollo 18 with Walter Cronkite?

I'm sure they thought of _something_, like a secret military mission
to check up on a failed Russian moon landing, but then they should
have called the film "Apollo 17 1/2" or "UIMMM-1" (USAF Investigative
Manned Moon Mission - 1).

Also, there's the Case of the Missing Expensive Lawn Ornament to be
concerned about...

John Savard
  #6  
Old August 21st 11, 03:14 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)


"Quadibloc" wrote in message
...
On Aug 20, 5:02 pm, David Spain wrote:

There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie.


A lot of people saw "The Blair Witch Project", so why couldn't this
one get an audience?


Right, all those fuzzy and halting moon videos have a
'blair witch' feel to it.

Of course, the premise is silly; after all, if the Moon parasites
attacked the astronauts _on_ the Moon, as this was _after_ the launch,


None of the above are facts in evidence. My impression is closer
to little underground moon vampires scurrying about~
But then it could be the russians were up to something, they were
awefully good with all the paranormal and mind-control stuff
back then.


how do you explain the fact that no one remembers watching the launch
mof Apollo 18 with Walter Cronkite?


Well no one ever heard of Apollo 20 either
Maybe this long secret video explains things better~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqR8zDGIwMo



I'm sure they thought of _something_, like a secret military mission
to check up on a failed Russian moon landing, but then they should
have called the film "Apollo 17 1/2" or "UIMMM-1" (USAF Investigative
Manned Moon Mission - 1).



There must be SOME reason we never went back?
It couldn't be that the moon is just a worthless pile of
rocks and dust.


Also, there's the Case of the Missing Expensive Lawn Ornament to be
concerned about...



Maybe Andy Griffith mounted a salvage mission to the moon
and sold it off at auction.



John Savard






  #7  
Old August 21st 11, 04:37 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)

On Aug 21, 10:14*am, "Jonathan" wrote:
"Quadibloc" wrote in message

...
On Aug 20, 5:02 pm, David Spain wrote:

There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie.
A lot of people saw "The Blair Witch Project", so why couldn't this
one get an audience?


Right, all those fuzzy and halting moon videos have a
'blair witch' feel to it.

Of course, the premise is silly; after all, if the Moon parasites
attacked the astronauts _on_ the Moon, as this was _after_ the launch,


None of the above are facts in evidence. My impression is closer
to little underground moon vampires scurrying about~
But then it could be the russians were up to something, they were
awefully good with all the paranormal and mind-control stuff
back then.

how do you explain the fact that no one remembers watching the launch
mof Apollo 18 with Walter Cronkite?


Well no one ever heard of Apollo 20 either
Maybe this long secret video explains things better~http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqR8zDGIwMo

I'm sure they thought of _something_, like a secret military mission
to check up on a failed Russian moon landing, but then they should
have called the film "Apollo 17 1/2" or "UIMMM-1" (USAF Investigative
Manned Moon Mission - 1).


There must be SOME reason we never went back?
It couldn't be that the moon is just a worthless pile of
rocks and dust.

Also, there's the Case of the Missing Expensive Lawn Ornament to be
concerned about...


Maybe Andy Griffith mounted a salvage mission to the moon
and sold it off at auction.



John Savard- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


could a saturn 5 have been launched to moon orbit from vandenberg?

was it technically possible??
  #8  
Old August 21st 11, 06:30 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Raven[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)

"bob haller" skrev i meddelelsen
...

could a saturn 5 have been launched to moon orbit from vandenberg?


was it technically possible??


Technically? Probably, at some payload penalty because of Vandenberg's
more northerly location. But the launch, of necessity going east, would
have been over a densely populated area - not nice in case of a crash of
something with the chemical energy of a small nuclear warhead. And the S-IC
stage would fall 560 km east of the launch site anyway, which from VAFB
would not be in the Atlantic Ocean, but a little past the border to Arizona
as far as I can tell.
If you want to launch into a polar orbit around the Earth, and then to
the Moon, you get a great big delta-v penalty... plus of course you need to
duplicate the KSC launch facilities on VAFB.

Jon Lennart Beck.

  #9  
Old August 21st 11, 10:51 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Quadibloc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,018
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)

On Aug 21, 8:14*am, "Jonathan" wrote:

Well no one ever heard of Apollo 20 either
Maybe this long secret video explains things better~


And here I was expecting the "Iron Sky" trailer...

John Savard
  #10  
Old August 21st 11, 10:55 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Invid Fan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default Apollo 18! (There's a reason we never went back)

In article , Jonathan
wrote:

"David Spain" wrote in message
...
Jonathan wrote:
Looks like fun!


OTOH...

There's a reason most of the movie going public will never see this movie.



The trailer has over a million hits on Utube, looks like it might
be a fairly big budget sci-fi.


No, it's very low budget from the look of it. Put two guys in front of
a static camera, or have one of the a characters filming the other.
Basically, Paranormal Activity with CGI

--
Chris Mack "If we show any weakness, the monsters will get cocky!"
'Invid Fan' - 'Yokai Monsters Along With Ghosts'
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A new analysis of a lunar rock brought back by the 1972 Apollo 16mission suggests.... Sam Wormley[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 3 August 20th 11 05:59 AM
Why didn't Apollo keep the ascent module as extra space on the way back? [email protected] History 89 January 31st 11 08:12 PM
The news said it costs 2 million dollars to bring the shuttle back to Florida on the back of the 747 lab~rat >:-) Space Shuttle 9 June 22nd 09 05:08 PM
NASA plans to put astronauts back on moon by 2018, using old Apollo parts Raving Loonie Misc 21 September 21st 05 08:08 PM
Apollo 9 question (was: Will we ever get this group back on topic?) OM History 1 May 14th 04 10:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.