digest 2453171

Nightingale wrote:

Sacqueboutier wrote:

Nightingale at somehow caused the following meaderings on
6/14/04 9:10 AM:


Sacqueboutier wrote:

:-)


Good morning Don :-)

I just skimmed the list you were kind enough to quote for me, and he's
right: most (perhaps even all, hard to tell on some of them when he
doesn't give any context) of it was off topic.


It doesn't matter whether it was on topic or off topic. He has appointed
himself the all-seeing, all-knowing moderator of this NG and he has no right
to do so.

He has the same right as any of us to post what he wants, including
comments and/or complaints about what we post.


And he has no right to disrupt newsgroups with his trolling ****. When he
does that, he's a troll and should be dealt with accordingly.


He sees antagonism where there is none.

I agree, and have told him so before.


And the retard is too thick to get the hint.


He's a kook, and he's a
magnet for the kind of posts he's getting.

He seems to be some kind of kook magnet.


No he IS the kook. He's already received one KOTM award. He's pulled this
bull**** of his before.


I wonder what happened to make
trolls like Shorts & DrPostman go after him the way they do. I took a
brief look in on sci.astro when they were crossposting to here a while
back, and what a mess - he was replying individually to all the
antagonistic posts (and there were a lot of them from people whose only
apparent purpose in being there was to bother him) & the threads got
quite huge. That's what made me change my mind about calling his digest
silly, btw. If he must reply to all the nonsense, this is better than
what I saw on sci.astro.


Butt he changed to a digest once he got lazy about replying. Also check
some of his replies to my posts where he takes out the target newsgroup
from the crosspost list. Typical troll behavior.


In short, through his
confrontational (confrontational even to those who are cordial to him)
attitude, he's asking for it.


Really?


Yes, really.

I'm probably lacking some history on this little war, but it
seems like some of the reaction he gets is out of proportion to anything
he posts.


Youz seem to have a problem picking up the venom, invective, snideness and
antogonism of his remarks.

For example, did he really ask for Shorts to posts his email
address to several groups & suggest people write to him,


I only suggested in this group that people write to him when he disappeared.
Besides, he shouldn't have emailed and complained from his regular account.

or for somebody
(I forget who now) to come back after a long absence and call him
slightly demented,


It may have escaped youz butt there was next to no replies to his digest ****
while he was gone. That speaks volumes to everyone except youz and, apparently,
Tholen.

or for you to keep adding comments about Barnes to
threads that had nothing to do with him? Not that I think he's perfect
or anything, but he's not the only one being confrontational at the
moment.


He's the one in most dire need of an enema, though.


--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspi
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.


--
Freddie 'fag' Shorts

I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks! Kerry sux!

Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
Contact me by email ) or mail me at
FS Newssite Inc.
101 West 23rd St. Suite 2237, New York, NY, 10011
On second thoughts, don't bother. Just sign me up for subscriptions.
I like to steal copyrighted material.

Check out my current web sites -
http://www.orwellian.org
http://www.miscstuff.org
http://home.nyc.rr.com/cypherpunk/

I'm really proud of this -
http://Frederick.Shorts.swellserver....orldrecord.php

http://www.plugger.info
http://www.pluggers.com/daily/

Suddenly, Frederick Shorts sprang forth and uttered these pithy words:
Frederick Shorts

*plonk*
--
aaronl at consultant dot com
For every expert, there is an equal and
opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke