Why is energy conserved?

On Apr 25, 4:23 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Apr 25, 3:46 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

Do you think the self-styled physicists with their so-called education
know what they are talking about?

Here is an example of the correct logical thinking.

** The geometry is invariant. To describe this geometry, a
coordinate system must be agreed upon. After the established
coordinate system, there is only one metric that can describe this
geometry. Given a metric alone without specifying what coordinate
system is to be utilized cannot possibly describe the geometry. The
same geometry can be described by many different metrics where a
unique coordinate system is associated with each metric.

The mistake that the self-styled physicists have been spewing is:

** The metric alone adequately describes the geometry without knowing
what the coordinate system is. absolutely stupid

With obvious mistakes like that, it is rather better off not to get a
so-called education. shrug

[sorrowful irrelevant garbage snipped for good]

Schwarzschild discovered the first solution to the field equation
through a clever reduction of the field equations. He noticed that
when the determinant of the metric is -1, the Ricci tensor becomes
drastically simplified.

Thus, his front effort other than using the common spherically
symmetric polar coordinate system was to transform this common
spherically symmetric polar coordinate system into one that yields a
determinant of -1 to the associated metric that in turn describes the
same geometry.

In doing so by accident, he found a static, spherically symmetric, and
asymptotically flat solution that does not manifest any black holes.
However, it was Hilbert who noticed another solution exists, and this
solution is now known as the Schwarzschild metric which was oblivious
to Schwarzschild. Of course, Hilbert’s solution, the Schwarzschild
metric, manifests black holes.

There are infinite such solutions that manifest black holes, and there
are infinite others that don’t. There are also infinite others that
manifest very complex relations such as antigravity without provoking
the LFRW metric and its derivatives. This allows a self-styled
physicist to play god on paper to create a universe of his own
matheMagical creation to justify what his straight-forward observation
is telling him. Ironically, yours truly has discovered a static,
spherically symmetric, and asymptotically flat solution that satisfies
the Newtonian law of gravity but indicating an accelerated
antigravitational effect at larger distances just like what Dr.
Perlmutter had concluded in his studies of the cosmos.

Anyhow, realizing the stupidity of the field equations that they can
yield any solutions just about imaginable, Hilbert walked away from
the monster, the set of field equations, that he had created in the
first place by pulling that so-called Lagrangian out of his ass
without any justifications. The rest is history. Einstein the
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar being a super dim wit did not
hesitate to eat up all the **** that Hilbert left behind as sole
creditor to GR.

Hilbert lived another two decades afterwards. Being the only one who
knew what was going on, he must have felt gross disappointment among
the self-styled physicists then and now if being relatively immortal.

Yes, yours truly can relate to that. Being the only one who
understands what the truth is, the world can ever be so forlorn.

shrug

On Apr 25, 11:47*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
[snip wasted words]

There's zero utility in working through your arguments and
deconstructing them point by point - done it before, you didn't learn
****.

Its' been so long for you that you don't even know where you think you
learned this stuff, but you still think you are right. So full of it.