Global climate consideration

http://chanceofrain.com/wp-content/u...ge-300x300.jpg

There are many scientists who believe that surface inclination to
solar radiation in the main input into temperature fluctuations
between July and January due to the fact that the dominant conceptions
still retain rotational inclination to the Sun whereas the main input
is the length of time a given latitudinal location spends in solar
radiation of the orbital shadow of the Earth,the Equator sees the
least variation while polar latitudes see the greater temperature
asymmetries allowing for micro-variations in some parts of the planet
due to proximity to oceans and things like that.

It is because of the utter hostility towards the planet's daily
rotational and orbital characteristics by followers of Royal Society
empiricism that the Equatorial La Nina event is not considered in
dynamical terms as the variations in water temperatures between a hot
El Nino and cold La Nina influence temperatures and subsequently
weather patterns depending on which event exists at the Equator.

The point is that without the major inputs from global climate into
hemispherical weather patterns which arise from equatorial and
therefore rotational dynamics,climate will just not make sense.The
Earth turns 1037.5 miles per hour and a full 24 901 miles in 24
hours,as daily rotation is separate to orbital motion,the yearly
fractional difference is omitted and retained by the orbital
characteristic of the Earth hence never more than a full 365 rotations
in an annual circuit.This allows genuine investigators to revisit both
planetary dynamics and solar inputs anew for climate inputs but that
is only possible when the conceptual baseline of the seasons are
explained accurately through planetary dynamics.

Thanks for sending the information to my private e-mail and happy New
Year to you but as it is always a person's choice to speak openly on
an unmoderated newsgroup about these matters,it would have been better
had you chosen to address the issue here,no harm done but few people
in my position have ever been treated as badly on very important
issues where there is more reason to encourage each other than to
criticize.

As the orbital daylight/darkness cycle represents a slow turning to
the central Sun ,coincident with the circle of illumination and
stretching through the dead center of the Earth from Arctic to
Antarctic circle,hence the polar coordinate appear to pivot around as
seen from the Sun,the present graphics give the Earth a variable
inclination instead and this is altogether wrong as seen in the final
animation on this website -

http://www.windows2universe.org/eart..._at_earth.html

An experimental scientist would have considered the major input to be
the length of time a latitude spends in solar radiation rather than
just inclination to solar radiation as people at the South pole do not
fry under 5 months of continuous radiation but the modification comes
from the Equator Southwards rather than the South pole Equator-
wards.The broad aspects of the current La Nina event,borrowing on a
principle of thermodynamics, would indicate less of an influence to
modifying polar temperatures but this is just one consideration among
dozens which have yet to be considered at it ain't going to happen in
a world which dumps daily and orbital motions into right ascension.

I had asked in another thread for better graphics to indicate the
orbital cycle where the polar coordinate act like an orbital beacon
for the orbital daylight/darkness cycle insofar as the polar
coordinates sweep around through 360 degrees over an annual cycle
hence the transition to polar darkness as the planet turns those
coordinates through the circle of illumination just as daily
rotation,as a separate motion,does every 24 hours.

Now,I have thought only of what others have sacrificed in order that I
work through what is both a very intricate set of principles on one
side and a very tangled network of distortions on the other yet it
doesn't end with blitzing people with being wrong but the difficult
but satisfying work that lies ahead in making sense of effects and
their causes.It is rare that a person works so long without having a
point of rest but such is our era and,by the grace of God,so be it and
while my private e-mail is open to anyone for agreement or
disagreement,second hand commentaries are best kept on an open forum.