![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NASA finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of
fossils to be credable. Oi ya They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. It could bring in a few billion bucks,and Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded Sad but true bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 2:17*pm, bert wrote:
NASA *finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to *be credable. Oi ya * * They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. *It could *bring in a few billion bucks,and *Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded * Sad but true *bert While they distance themselves from them publicly, guys like Richard C. Hoagland are the best fund raisers for NASA because they kept public interest in the explorations alive. People want to hear tales of signs of life, and lost ancient Martian civilizations. They have little interest in hearing about analysis of minerals on a lifeless and barren planet. Double-A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bert" wrote in message ... NASA finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to be credable. Oi ya They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. It could bring in a few billion bucks,and Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded Sad but true bert If there are microfossils on the Martian surface, maybe the dust storms would have worn them down. But if the rovers just dig a little more... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Double-A" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 2:17 pm, bert wrote: NASA finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to be credable. Oi ya They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. It could bring in a few billion bucks,and Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded Sad but true bert While they distance themselves from them publicly, guys like Richard C. Hoagland are the best fund raisers for NASA because they kept public interest in the explorations alive. People want to hear tales of signs of life, and lost ancient Martian civilizations. They have little interest in hearing about analysis of minerals on a lifeless and barren planet. **In my personal opinion the Martians are there, they are just using their telepathic power of illusion to trick us into seeing a barren landscape, to keep our space ships away and us from bugging their peace. Kind of the way it is in Ray Bradbury's famous, "The Martian Chronicles." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 5:34*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Jan 8, 2:17*pm, bert wrote: NASA *finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to *be credable. Oi ya * * They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. *It could *bring in a few billion bucks,and *Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded * Sad but true *bert While they distance themselves from them publicly, guys like Richard C. Hoagland are the best fund raisers for NASA because they kept public interest in the explorations alive. *People want to hear tales of signs of life, and lost ancient Martian civilizations. *They have little interest in hearing about analysis of minerals on a lifeless and barren planet. Double-A Right you are NASA likes water for errosion and not sand storms. Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 2:45*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 2:17 pm, bert wrote: NASA finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to be credable. Oi ya They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. It could bring in a few billion bucks,and Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded Sad but true bert While they distance themselves from them publicly, guys like Richard C. Hoagland are the best fund raisers for NASA because they kept public interest in the explorations alive. *People want to hear tales of signs of life, and lost ancient Martian civilizations. *They have little interest in hearing about analysis of minerals on a lifeless and barren planet. **In my personal opinion the Martians are there, they are just using their telepathic power of illusion to trick us into seeing a barren landscape, to keep our space ships away and us from bugging their peace. Kind of the way it is in Ray Bradbury's famous, "The Martian Chronicles." It does seem rather odd how all those Martian canals so painstakingly sketched by Percival Lowell all vanished once we got probes close to Mars! Double-A |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Double-A" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 2:45 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 2:17 pm, bert wrote: NASA finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to be credable. Oi ya They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. It could bring in a few billion bucks,and Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded Sad but true bert While they distance themselves from them publicly, guys like Richard C. Hoagland are the best fund raisers for NASA because they kept public interest in the explorations alive. People want to hear tales of signs of life, and lost ancient Martian civilizations. They have little interest in hearing about analysis of minerals on a lifeless and barren planet. **In my personal opinion the Martians are there, they are just using their telepathic power of illusion to trick us into seeing a barren landscape, to keep our space ships away and us from bugging their peace. Kind of the way it is in Ray Bradbury's famous, "The Martian Chronicles." It does seem rather odd how all those Martian canals so painstakingly sketched by Percival Lowell all vanished once we got probes close to Mars! **That's what I've been saying for years. Before Llowel's time, the Martians weren't on to us looking at them. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 2:42*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"bert" wrote in message ... NASA *finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to *be credable. Oi ya * * They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. *It could *bring in a few billion bucks,and *Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded * Sad but true *bert If there are microfossils on the Martian surface, maybe the dust storms would have worn them down. *But if the rovers just dig a little more... They'd have to dig/drill meters deep. But what the hell, at perhaps another ten billion public funded dollars per meter, what do we have to lose? ~ BG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 2:42 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bert" wrote in message ... NASA finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to be credable. Oi ya They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. It could bring in a few billion bucks,and Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded Sad but true bert If there are microfossils on the Martian surface, maybe the dust storms would have worn them down. But if the rovers just dig a little more... They'd have to dig/drill meters deep. But what the hell, at perhaps another ten billion public funded dollars per meter, what do we have to lose? **Maybe the ones the build and supply the rover should do it for free, just for the fun of exploring the Red Planet? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 8:44*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 2:42 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "bert" wrote in message ... NASA finding oceans of water on Mars,now will have to show lots of fossils to be credable. Oi ya They are now stuck in their own crap if they can not produce just one fossil "red clam".They NASA are good at conning the public,and will soon come up with "Marcian micrfossils. It could bring in a few billion bucks,and Mafia NASA always can get the bucks when neeeded Sad but true bert If there are microfossils on the Martian surface, maybe the dust storms would have worn them down. But if the rovers just dig a little more... They'd have to dig/drill meters deep. *But what the hell, at perhaps another ten billion public funded dollars per meter, what do we have to lose? **Maybe the ones the build and supply the rover should do it for free, just for the fun of exploring the Red Planet? Of course, those Sean Rothschilds should do it for free, even though every cent they claim to their name came from us to begin with. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fossils on Mars | Thomas Lee Elifritz | Astronomy Misc | 4 | December 27th 04 07:13 PM |
Fossils on Mars | Thomas Lee Elifritz | Policy | 4 | December 27th 04 07:13 PM |
Fossils on Mars | MarsFossils | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 27th 04 07:08 PM |
Fossils on Mars | MarsFossils | Policy | 0 | December 27th 04 07:08 PM |